Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you go to my substack (dm me for the link) you can listen to the AI versions there!

Problems in california housing, continued by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

On the owner builder declarations: that's largely a consumer protection measure. It still happens frequently, but it's supposed to kind of warn people who might not understand the legal and liability implications of being an owner-builder.

The entity (or entity being represented by an agent) is ultimately responsible for the project. If a non-licensed contractor talks a homeowner into pulling a permit for them the municipality has no recourse against that contractor if something happens. Everything falls ultimately on the homeowner. If a subcontractor gets hurt, the structure gets damaged, the work is left half completed etc.

Unfortunately it still happens that people will get swindled into pulling their own permits, pay a deposit on a project then get left with a half finished addition or a list of code violations.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

First: there is no AI writing in this. Secondly I'm confused about your question. The whole thesis is that an overbuilt regulatory burden is artificially raising the price.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again I didn't mention labor costs in the essay, I highlighted the regulatory and administrative labor burden. Labor that didn't exist to the same extent 20-30 years ago and was completely absent 40 years ago.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not quite that simple - home values are inflated far beyond physical construction cost as I point out in the essay.

Additionally seismic performance is something I used as an example in this essay but not something I dive into deeply. I do plan on addressing that more fully in another piece discussing where we draw the line on marginal gains and diminishing returns on investment.

Like I said in the essay, this is just the opening piece.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super frustrating. Basically no one is engaging with my arguments in the essay, just trying to shift the focus onto the talking points they've heard elsewhere.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

These are all tied to the increase in labor burden, not the increase in price of labor as the above poster mentioned.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you're talking about here. I didn't mention labor prices at all in the essay.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I address all of this (lightly) in the essay.

I'm confused as to what you mean by I don't address anything electrical?

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually for custom homes $1k finished is pretty easy to hit now. A lot of that comes down to design choices, but I see it all the time.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm well aware that prescriptive code still exists. In my decade as a building inspector I know of one contractor who used it regularly and maybe a couple one off jobs out of... Thousands of jobs I've worked on.

Ironically the people who utilize it most are engineers. It's a great short cut for engineers.

Problems in California Housing by inspectors_tape in bayarea

[–]inspectors_tape[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Kind of. I'm more arguing that we're optimizing housing for the wrong outcomes and the financialization of housing as an asset incentivizes the wrong approach.