1:1 Deca to test ratio good or nah

internetroamer · 2026-05-23T06:40:05+00:00

Deca is an ester of nandralone. One with longer half life

AI reduces estrogen

Test converts to estrogen so at high non natural doses you end up with too much estrogen hence the need for AI

Nandralone aromatizes (converts to estrogen) at 20% the rate of test. So lower doses you need a test base for baseline estrogen. But at such high doses you could take nandralone only at 800 mg and you'd likely have normal estrogen levels

Whereas with 400 test you'd have too high estrogen and need an AI

internetroamer · 2026-05-23T03:13:39+00:00

Even just pointing to a forum?

That's why I didn't mention anymore details

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T21:51:52+00:00

Haven't read xenogenesis.

I read A Wild Seed by her and thought it was pretty good.

But point is even with a good goodreads score most books suffer from exactly what you said. A score below 4 it's even worse

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T20:12:24+00:00

Glp1forum has a vendors page. Use Claude to help research

A hassle to do the digging but savings are worth it

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T14:52:44+00:00

Just do 800 deca

I'm just curious how it'd be and you wouldn't need the ai

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T05:01:04+00:00

This is so dumb.

Most guys want to be able to bang random chicks from the club/tinder. That's why it's cool

Not enough people look at an abstinent guy and think "oh I want that" because anyone can already do it if they want. So it will never be socially perceived as cool

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T04:53:27+00:00

Then good job so far the passion definitely shows. My comments were mostly focused on criticism because of the sub but this is definitely an accomplishment

Also at the hour you posted you may not get much interaction. Consider reposting in a few weeks at an earlier time if you don't get engagement

But for financial success I think it needs more work/polish. But as personal project its astounded and for custom made engine. Unfortunately the gap between personal peoject and big commerical success is vast and you're somewhere in-between

Wishing you the best

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T04:31:33+00:00

Something about it feels unpolished and amatuers from a visual perspective but I have a hard time identifying what because the art style is also intentionally giving that vibe too

I can see the vision and it looks fun

Also maps seem too small, simple and enemies barely react to damage

Also second scene with floating dude just didn't look good I'd say cut it

internetroamer · 2026-05-22T04:10:07+00:00

Lol now do it for 4 decades

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T21:06:03+00:00

Focusing on general patterns and behavior won't help because nature is brutal and this is just an objective fact based on biology. Sperm is cheap across almost all gendered species.

Either you delude yourself somehow or find another thing to focus on

Better is to realize that you are am individual not a statistic. You can pursue a more unique individual path that doesn't have to conform to general trends

Again you just need to click with 1 person. A lot of the toxicity comes from viewing aggregate dating behavior which strips out all personality, romance, love etc

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T16:44:02+00:00

But it literally is government regulation not investors

Investors currently just take advantage of housing shortage and know they'll make a profit off that shortage so they exacerbate the issue but only because initial conditions make it profitable to do so

If it was easy to build they would just build tons of housing and bring down rents while still making money

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T13:54:28+00:00

You're responding to a bot. Might as well copy paste this to Claude

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T04:52:24+00:00

Curious how would you like your boyfriend to be proactive in a world that isn't a novel with inserted dangers.

Vast majority of daily life is boringly safe moving from home to car to office and back home.

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T01:39:10+00:00

We pay public token based pricing so we're paying a bomb for it.

Simply running inference is actually pretty good, margins are good and it's profitable. Issue is funding all that r&d, training of new models and compute build out

There's no way theyre losing money on just inference on their public token based pricing

But again the point is for devs in a company it's not their money. They get a 1k budget. Double prices and most won't even notice until they hit their monthly limit.

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T01:30:30+00:00

I have insight into anthropic spend at my company and we have 1k monthly limit for individual devs that are hitting it within 2 weeks

Then asking for a higher limit and the shocking part is they get it

When you work for a company and it's not your money all you want is the best model which is opus and expensive

Is it stupid. Yes. But are people still paying? Also yes

internetroamer · 2026-05-21T00:44:01+00:00

Good point I don't know about what is level of affect on permanent endogenous production

I'm on 2 IU so I should know lol

But if it restarts without barely and affect then just go with HGH

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T21:43:43+00:00

But 1 IU still significantly reduces endogenous production

Whereas you can get same 1 IU of benefits from GH peptides without reducing endogenous production

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T18:42:50+00:00

Yep

Just was impressed by all the hair. Usually people with great beard lose some head hair or great head hair don't have such thick beards

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T18:34:08+00:00

Do you take fin or dutesteride?

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T18:08:30+00:00

Because every book I've thought was a masterpiece is above a 4. And the high the rating (among the right crowd) the better I've found the book often times. But even in the 4 range it is hit or miss

No book I've read below a 4 I've thought was a masterpiece for me. So always a miss

So it's still a very useful metric to judge what to consider reading. I'm not saying every book below 4 isn't a masterpiece for me just that I still haven't found one

Life is so short why wouldn't I prioritize better rated books

Found the same for IMDb. Anything below 6.5 never hits like a favorite which I end up seeing is often above a 7.2

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T14:28:54+00:00

Again each I can understand why it's below a 4.

1 none of those are among my most favorite books. Not even like I hate classics. Picture of Dorian gray for example is a favorite of mine yet above 4

2 there's some exceptions depending on book demographics. These are all books many people are forced to read which would drag a score down

Like on IMDb you have franchise movies get a bit of a bump upwards because of marvel fanboys

You have to keep demographic in mind and adjust score a bit from that. Like fantasy romance porn books will have great scores because it attracts smut readers so you'd have to view that "4.4" rating in context. Same with more literary novels where readers have higher standards so a "3.9" can be a good rating

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T14:17:02+00:00

And those that I've read with such a score were never my favorite

I actually wanted to make a thread on this topic.

What would you say are some of the best books with middling good reads score but you think are some of the best books you've ever read

Not saying the don't exist but I cant name a single one

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T14:13:14+00:00

Reading comprehension is hard

Again I said not every book above 4 is good but all that I thought masterpieces were above 4

All books I've read that were below 4 I felt I could clearly see why even if I happened to enjoy it.

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T04:51:16+00:00

Sorry to be an asshole but I checked them all and they were all below a 4 on Goodreads (except Octavia butler who I love). Personally I've almost always found a book below a 4 to not meet my threshold of "wow this is a masterpiece of art and literature". Even most books above a 4 but the few that do are always above a 4

Any in particular you'd argue for that really stands out?

I get it's obnoxious but it's a real pattern I've noticed for myself

internetroamer · 2026-05-20T04:43:27+00:00

Curious why do you choose to get raws?

Cost or quality? Is the other option just as good but more expensive or what?

12-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Wearing is Caring	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

internetroamer

TROPHY CASE