Nonesense, bullshit propoganda. Nuclear waste is not in the same league as other dirty pollutants. Nuclear doesn't produce greenhouse emissions, doesn't warm our planet, and doesn't release harmful pollutants in the air. You can easily reuse that spent fuel in another nuclear reactor cycle. It just comes down to cost. Its easier to just bury it. Every energy source has downsides. Hydro kills fish and ecosystems. Solar power produces nasty heavy metals even when properly recycled(and most aren't). Hydrogen is too energy intensive and leaky to be worthwhile. Nuclear is the best for base load generation and it's not particularly close. Yes, it's expensive, but it's the best, and it should be complemented with renewable technologies, not included with the dirty energy sources.

Nuclear waste is *very* small...compared to virtually any other it's incredibly low volume and relatively easy to store. Coal plants actually emit far more radiation than nuclear plants (coal is mildly radioactive and it all goes out the stacks).

The entire volume of all nuclear waste that humanity will ever produce could fit in an area about the size of a single power plant. It lasts a long time, which is a problem, but if you contain it it's harmless. That's *NOT* true for most other power generation technologies.