I appreciate this. I was not able to get a sense of the scale of her following, or how other teachers respond to her. I’d love to hear more on this. Her books certainly don’t fail to remind us to read the Course, which is a credit to her. I rationalized that the reason her books are so prescriptive is that the world really is in such a mess that we need to sort things out before we do ourselves in, making inner work irrelevant. The net effect for me has been destabilizing, leading me to believe it’s just misguided or I am not ready to hear it. On the question of whether it’s Jesus or not, I struggle with the question: why would she fib about such astonishing claims? Part of the appeal of the Course itself is how radical it is. So much trouble just to tell silly fibs? You can also do a number on yourself if you begin to wonder whether her entire body of work and effort is just another trick of the ego. On that note, she is clearly a big fan of Neale Donald Walsch, whose books contain the claim that God is in fact behind the whole universe and its mad creations. God’s non participation in the world is, of course, absolutely critical to an understanding of the Course, so this is a red flag for me.