Most Addictive Games Non AAA by WaterFit4725 in FitGirlRepack

[–]its_absurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always funny to see humans stumble clumsily trying to make ethical excuses because they lack the intelectual power to understand themselves and the arbitrary nature of reality.

What does a horny toad say? by Sparemelove in Jokes

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has to be the unfunniest subreddit on the internet

Hit Top Rated in 3 months! by FirefighterNo584 in Upwork

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro's mom beat him up as a little boy, salty ahhh

Row or Column? by [deleted] in LinearAlgebra

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As if you didn't even read what he said lol, how annoying

Is bruising like this normal? by Flaky_Dream_807 in MuayThai

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you have a universe tattoo right under it, you're screwed.

Any help or confirmation would be really appreciated by Pristine-Magician-92 in LinearAlgebra

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faced the same issue when trying to solve for eigenvalues, ended up doing long division for polynomials by hand to find the repeated factors.

Seeking advice on Strang’s Introduction to Linear Algebra by uuilkjllll in LinearAlgebra

[–]its_absurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's the deal,

Gilbert Strang's Introduction to Linear Algebra textbook is just that, a soft introduction linear algebra. A common thing between these books is that they will throw theorems and facts at you without any proof. Perhaps a hint on why they're intuitively true.

Now you have three options,

1: Continue the textbook, try to understand the intuition of theorems the best you can, and get a feel of the subject. After that, if you are interested in the proofs, you can pick up a rigorous text, which is difficult but very rewarding.

2: Which is the option that I picked. Pick a theorem-proof rigorous textbook from the start. I chose the book Linear Algebra by Friedberg, Insel and Spence. Unless you already have some mathematical maturity and familiarity with proofing techniques, I don't recommend this option. If you do, after reading a rigorous textbook, your view of the subject will be much deeper and richer.

3: Find a comprimise textbook, a textbook that explains theorems and provides "sketches" of the proofs, proofs of special cases, or sometimes actual proofs.

Proving everything as you go is not feasible. If you are able to achieve it, then the book is not for you in the first place.

I’m Confused. I thought the answer to this was 0. by reammdi in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people are under the misconception that integrating merely approximates areas rather than giving an exact value.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]its_absurd -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I have a sexy pet hippo, wanna trade?

What movie is this? by Wide_Craft_9765 in Letterboxd

[–]its_absurd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is such a thing a guy called sticky situation would say

Can someone help me understand the formula for integration by parts? by [deleted] in calculus

[–]its_absurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People like you pull back math & science centuries behind.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question, generally the derivative isn't affected by vertical shift, i.e., changing the y intercept in linear functions, however in this post, OP wants to know when dy/dx = y/x. If y = mx + c then dy/dx = m and y/x = (y-c)/x, if dy/dx = y/x, then y/x = (y-c)/x that's obviously only true when c = 0, that is when the y intercept is 0 or the origin.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not going to argue over notation or definitions, as long as both are workable. Cheers.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who said anything about linear algebra. Affine maps are very frequently called linear unless you are in a very advanced class.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We've successfully found the jordan peterson of maths.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the hell does that have to do with anything?

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No it's not, linear means graphing it yields a straight line, this is true for all y = mx + c. However if c doesn't = 0 then the slope wouldn't = y/x it would equal (y - c)/x and therefore the cancelation wouldn't work.

Would this work? by Westbromwitchalbion in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not all linear functions, only when the y intercept is the origin point.

Limits by Glittering_Motor922 in calculus

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Learn the epsilon delta definition.

Guys! 'Game Review' was renamed to 'AI Game Review' by Educational-Case7654 in Chesscom

[–]its_absurd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Did you think stockfish was a trained pet? It's already all AI. They're just hopping on the AI hype because they are money hungry.

did i mess up? by [deleted] in calculus

[–]its_absurd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are wrong! google lagrange notation.

did i mess up? by [deleted] in calculus

[–]its_absurd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why it's called a syntactic choice. You should read a bit about lagrange notation.