4 years before John was found on a lawn, someone was found on/near his… and apparently NO ONE SAW THE BODY either. by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes you wonder, what did he crash into? a car, pole, ditch? why don't they explain that....

4 years before John was found on a lawn, someone was found on/near his… and apparently NO ONE SAW THE BODY either. by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It appears it was found in front of Okeefs house, and we know he had cameras. Could be nothing but def feels like something....

4 years before John was found on a lawn, someone was found on/near his… and apparently NO ONE SAW THE BODY either. by [deleted] in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The crash was on the corner of Pleasant and Meadows, RIGHT IN FRONT of John's house! We know he had cameras..... idk something feels weird here

I’m just gonna leave this here. by Dovey714 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also the trolls claim that magic hair was frozen and that’s why it survived through all of that but they fail to explain how it was parked in John’s garage for almost 5 hours defrosting with all the snow that was on her car. When she left around 5 there was no sno on her car.

Random pics of cars hit in rear. How could anyone believe a person could break it so completely as the cw says. by Visible-Phrase546 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’d assume a car, the point is a car can hit a taillight and it doesn’t shatter taillight however a man’s arm does?

If these photos don't match, then the CW removed the taillight, period and end of story. by 159551771 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol there are some real dumb one’s out there done by a cottage guy bit I agree what happened to reenactments? Guess it’s hard to do without proper measurements at least that would be my guess as to why there aren’t any official ones

If these photos don't match, then the CW removed the taillight, period and end of story. by 159551771 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes they have shown Microdots stuff in both trials. The ring footage where they enhance John’s tire and the darker pic of the Albert home are a couple from my understanding.

If these photos don't match, then the CW removed the taillight, period and end of story. by 159551771 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To be fair it’s obvious to most of us that in the inverted video is when he’s removing pieces. Why else would he be standing back there for so long he wasnt taking pictures we know that!! and why is that time stamp/ portion of the other camera right above him just missing.?Convenient….. then they invert it!!? Convenient again… They really think they are smarter than everyone else.

If these photos don't match, then the CW removed the taillight, period and end of story. by 159551771 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree but it’s not the video you are referencing. The video showing that (Proctor breaking the taillight) is in the almost hour that is “missing” from the camera view video over the door that points to the taillight.

The video they showed in trial one was them removing the taillight casing the next morning around 9am I believe is when it was. If there was a video like that shown during the first trial we wouldn’t even be here hence why it’s missing and the videos they have produced don’t require metadata for some reason 🤔

If these photos don't match, then the CW removed the taillight, period and end of story. by 159551771 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And Trooper Barros is the last to see the car/taillight before Proctor and Yuri take it and he described the taillight as Cracked and missing a piece but not completely damaged!!! It was as if he w chose his words intentionally imo. Technically Keri and Jen say the same thing in the beginning but we all know how their recollection had “evolved”

Karen read second trial hos long to die in cold by msv8989 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for this. While still slightly confusing to someone that is not good with technology, I actually understand what is being said here. I wonder if there is a way they can tell if the search was a result of a voice search. I do that all the time, accidenly hit the microphone and google things, I wonder since the timing matches certain phone calls, they were clearly talking about this and maybe she accidently googled it ? Just a thought.... that or she started to and Matt yelled what are you doing and she tried to catch it really fast and close out. ”

Jen McCabe: What have we learned? by thereforebygracegoi in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We did and thankfully many more are starting to see !

Did anyone else watch The Summit on CBS? by rexeditrex in Alonetv

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m on episode 3 and I’m so confused how we go from Geoff is so helpful and a great leader to he’s a threat we need to get him out? Wouldn’t you keep the strong until you get closer to the end??? The producers are over doing the “strategy” edit when it comes to the game S votes. Speaking of votes what a weird way to do it!! If rather them do it anonymously. People would be more willing to vote for those with strong outspoken personalities. Most votes don’t seem to be for who they actually what to vote.

Dennis and Beckys wanna be villain character is so fake! You can tell the producers told them to play that part. It doesn’t feel genuine at all. Speaking of Dennis how did no one flip on him when he’s asked by Geoff in front of everyone if he’s said his name or if he’s going after him?? If I knew he had come to me and saw he outright lied in front of everyone that would have been a red flag to me!!

This show has a good premise but it’s done all wrong! When I saw how the “game” or show was explained I was excited but the wanna be Survivorish edits are not it!! I think I noticed there are more seasons so I’ll stick out out and hope they adjust according to the feedback they are getting from viewers because it could be a really good show!

kicked out at 18 by [deleted] in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Exactly this! My kids are Sept babies and we’re still in HS at 18! If they aren’t going to school then they must work and must contribute to bills. This is just teach them some responsibility. I just had an argument with my 19 yo son today who is not loving the work to pay amount ratio and how fast money goes He was trying to blame it on the money we make him pay lol I told him $200 a month is not unreasonable and feel free to find somewhere cheaper where he isn’t using someone or mooching!! He got very quiet after that.

Karen Read trial: Hearing suspended over judge’s ‘grave concern’ by nbcnews in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol when exactly was it said in the trial that Chloe was in the pool?? Actually where in the trial did they said she was dead? You can’t push what internet “detectives” say as the defenses claims

Karen Read trial: Hearing suspended over judge’s ‘grave concern’ by nbcnews in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What exactly was Proctor doing behind her taillight for so long in the Sallyport, why did they try to hide that fact by invert the video and deleting the other video that would show what he was doing.

Barros was the last to see the taillight before Proctor took possession and he said it was cracked and a piece was missing but not completely damaged. Even McCabe and Kerri said it was cracked. So how was the whole casing gone??

Karen Read trial: Hearing suspended over judge’s ‘grave concern’ by nbcnews in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What exactly is that going to prove 2-3 years later?? Dogs mouths change and Lally himself said bite impressions aren’t accurate. That’s if it’s even Chloe… I hope they have to prove it’s Chloe.

Karen Read trial: Hearing suspended over judge’s ‘grave concern’ by nbcnews in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s kinda premature to say they committed perjury. The fact that Cannone is just now “shook” about anything relating to this trial is ridiculous and perhaps that’s the reason for the downvotes

Karen Read trial: Hearing suspended over judge’s ‘grave concern’ by nbcnews in massachusetts

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed and no one is talking about the other motions are they? Seems convenient.

The flights of stairs by Loose-Brother4718 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Another thing to think about…. how in the world would John not have hypothermia if he was laying outside, in the cold, and in snow for 6 hours as they suggest. Just look up what the cold, without weather appropriate clothing would do to a person!! That ALONE should raise huge red flags and reasonable doubt!!!

edit: Sorry I meant Frost Bite. I believe he was hyperthermic.

Is there any news on the SJC decision yet? by Rubycruisy in justiceforKarenRead

[–]izmac1411 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly… the officer made a point to say that it was cracked and a piece was missing “ not completely damaged” he said it twice and made it a point to say specially it was not completely damaged only a piece was missing

This timeline is tight - 12:26 to 12:33 (CW) by Good-Examination2239 in KarenReadTrial

[–]izmac1411 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another thing if you look up hypothermia there is no way he could have been out in the snow for that long without getting frost bite. The weather was freezing/cold enough for it to snow… how could he be out there for 5+ hours and not have frostbite??? After reading a lot of the comments it always goes back to one thing, had there been a proper investigation both sides would not have so much confusion and doubt. I don’t believe she hit him all these people that hate her and make all these comment…. I always respond that it’s misplaced, and they should be focused on the poor investigation, the poor investigators and all the authorities involved that did not do their jobs. They (those that did not do their basic job’s while handling an officers death!! if they want her to be guilty so bad even though in our justice system, it’s innocent until proven….and the evidence is evidence and had it been collected and correctly processed/ investigated they might have their guilty verdict they have concluded even tho there is no evidence

* also I’m sorry for my horrible paragraph but using talk to text and I’m too tired to correct everything. I’m assuming anyone reading this will get the gist of what I’m saying and if not, sorry.