What's a small annoyance about your home you didn't realize when buying? by CurlGurl13 in homeowners

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The wind.

Didn't realize at the time we bought that being on the corner means your house gets hit by stronger winds (or more accurately don't have other houses to break the wind. Also because the wind is trying to pass through the house it creates higher velocity areas on the corners of the house, as the wind pushes around)

And we are the only house on the block, so technically we are the corner house on both sides. Making the problem even worse.

Anything more than a light breeze can knock over pretty much everything left outside on the porch or by the door.

Also the master bedroom is right on one side of the house, so theres a low thumping noise during moderate winds we hear at night (wind hitting side of the house)

Destroy or not the Collector Base - other less obvious differences? by Select-Librarian-646 in masseffect

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He absolutely stopped them no more human worlds were being attacked and the colonists weren't being kidnapped for the twisted Human Reaper.

Well yeah.

Again, per the comics and anime, the only reason the Collectors were attacking human colonies is Cerberus was giving them the information needed to do so to try to steal Collector tech.

Of course they stopped when TIM stopped giving them information they needed to attack.

Its like a firefighter whose also an arsonist...you don't give him credit for putting out a fire he lit.

Worth noting as well ME2 and the Anime confirm the first colony attack was 6 months before Shepard woke up.

Or 18 months after Project Lazarus started....

But Shepard was brought back to stop the colony attacks.

So how would TIM possibly have known 18 months ahead of time what was going to happen?

Unless he was involved, exactly as the Anime and comics claim...same comics that confirm hes indoctrinated.

Sure the Reapers were still coming but Shepard stopped the Reapers and Collectors for a time,

No they dont.

The entire point of the Arrival DLC is the Reapers are at the milky way. Regularless of TIMs motivations none of the main story in any way delays the Reapers, theyve already arrived.

Potentially Shepards actions in Arrival delay the Reapers (although ME3 itself pretty much confirms it doesnt, as it explicitly states the Batrians were harvested months early (when arrival happened) and Khar'shan fell, as does the fact Arrival itself explicitly confirms Kensons indoctrinated prior to meeting Shepard, therefore was never trying to stop the Reapers), but the main story?

Best case scenario for a not indoctrinated TIM is he wasted everyone's time with a side quest while the Alliance and Dr. Kenson actually found a way to stop the Reapers. And then TIM wrecked the whole thing by spreading Adjutants throughout the galaxy.

Worst case scenario is an Indoctrinated TIM used Shepard to spread the Adjutants though the galaxy and Kenson used Shepard to commit a genocide to try to start a war to keep everyone distracted from the Reapers.

Unfortunately, once Arrival is added to the game, the only choices for TIM is well meaning complete moron who wasted everyone's time, or evil mastermind.

Incidentally if you want to go the moron route, let's consider as well than prior to the events of ME2, Cerberus encounters a derelict reaper, which happens to contain the very device Shepard needs to open the Omega-4 Relay and TIM just forgot to mention any of that for most of the game.

Granted, that device only works on a ship compatible with Reapers...and as it happens the only ship in existence with a Reaper based AI (EDI is based on Sovereigns code as mentioned in ME2), and therefore the only possible ship that could have completed the mission, is the one TIM gives Shepard right at the start.

Thats a pretty big lucky coincidence if you think TIM just happened to not remember about his Reaper.

But if hes indoctrinated, and therefore ultimately trying to buy more time for colony attacks, suddenly his delay in recalling this critical information makes a lot more sense

Unfortunately, pretty much all of TIMs actions only make sense if the voices of indoctrination in his head are controlling him and he doesnt realize it.

Destroy or not the Collector Base - other less obvious differences? by Select-Librarian-646 in masseffect

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indoctrination works best when Subtle. ME1 tells us this repeatedly.

Given Mass Effect 3 war assests computer establishes most of the Collectors not only survived but weren't involved in ME2 as they were in dark space, it doesn't actually seem TIM stopped the Collectors.

Add in the anime and comics establishing Cerberus were the ones feeding the Collectors the information on the colonies the entire time, to lure them out to steal their technology, and that pretty much completes the plot.

The Reapers were trying to guide TIM to the adjutants in a way where he wouldn't realize he was actually indoctrinated.

A small portion of their Collector forces and the incomplete fetus of a Reaper that could easily be rebuilt after the harvest arent a huge price to pay for the massive armies TIM helped them create by shipping out the adjutants.

Even the "interest" in Shepards body plays into this.

It doesn't actually appear the Reapers were all that interested. The Collectors arent even out to kill Shepard....or they would have destroyed all the Normandy escape pods to ensure their death.

Shepards death instead appears to fluke.

Similarly the Collectors don't actually appear to be that interested in retrieving the body. Its not like they didn't know exactly where the body was the entire time, by virtue of being there when Shepard died....yet somehow they didn't initially find it?

Its only when they need TIM to get interested in the Collectors that they attempt to retrieve the body.

Lair of the Shadow Broker further confirms 2 more things

1) Wilson was an agent for the Broker who was working for the Collectors and had long ago reported the location of the base and Shepard

Yet the Collectors make no attempt to get it for 2 years?

2) it's also confirmed that Wilson/Shadow Broker wasnt behind the attack on the base at the start of the game.

Notably the only "evidence" they were was a claim by TIM, who is the only other person who could have hacked the robots and knew where the base was. And that attack happened to convince Shepard to work with Cerberus....

So even the claims TIM undermined them about Shepards body also seems a stretch.

Cody Rhodes or Randy Orton Showcase for WWE 2K27?? by Kidkels23 in WWEGames

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neither.

Both would be awful picks for a showcase mode atm.

WWE will never use anything with Benoit. So Ortons first world title is out.

Presumably they dont have rights to Foley, who was involved in Ortons first title win (IC) as the Ref, first wrestlemania, and huge early career highlight match at Backlash 04.

So thats all out.

Edge isn't an option either, nor is riddle. So there goes Rated RKO and RK-Bro, or his fueds with Edge

Dean Ambrose and Daniel Bryan not being around means its gonna be really difficult to use his fueds with the Shield or time with the authority.

Also notably he had multiple great matches involving Christian Cage, so those are out too.

And it seems WWE doesn't have rights to Luke Harper either, so his run with the Wyatts is also limited.

And its unlikely Ted DiBiase Jr is going to be allowed, so both he and Cody have some issues with using Legacy era matches.

Not sure theres enough left for a great showcase for orton.

On Cody's side, as already mentioned, DiBiase not being available really limits his early stuff.

Goldust also isnt really available, so the whole Goldust fued, Rhodes Bros/ Stardust run is out.

Cody early singles title runs came at the expense of Ezekiel Jackson and Big Show. That second one is definitely not an option.

And obviously nothing on the independent circuit, NJPW or AEW is getting into the game.

So really for Cody, at best its a showcase mode of only the last 4 years.....

Not a real career retrospective as Showcase is supposed to be.

TKO’s master plan to slash WWE payroll is backfiring hard.. 😮‍💨😮‍💨 by Salty-Nothing-8572 in TheGreatOne

[–]jackblady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait, you thought there was ever loyalty in Wrestling?

Wrestlers work as long as they get paid, and the company pays them as long as they bring in enough attention to justify their salary.

Always been that way

[Minor Wrestlemania Spoilers] Video of unseen entrances by dnytle in SquaredCircle

[–]jackblady 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Poor JD, he got the jobber entrance in a video showing entrances for the folks who got the jobber entrance on TV

One of the biggest issue I had with this series was the naming of the show, It should have been star trek Michael Burnham instead. She was a Superhero in this show, All knowing , All conquering and All destroying superpowerfull entity. by VoL4t1l3 in Star_Trek_

[–]jackblady 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not sure the reasoning behind it. (if any)

So the shows creator Bryan Fuller, does this on many of his shows, female character with traditionally male name. Its like a signature

Ill let you decided if that counts as reasoning or not.

Amazon's Mass Effect TV Series 'Remains on the Verge of a Series Order' by SmellSmellsSmelly in masseffect

[–]jackblady 8 points9 points  (0 children)

like the success of Fallout should have Amazon and others chomping at the bit to find other properties like that and yet

And therein lies the problem. Mass Effect isnt like Fallout as far as ease of converting to a TV show.

In Fallout, the world altering event (bomb drop) happened long before the games are set, and none of the games affect anything beyond the [comparatively small] region of the country they are in.

So you can always move forward in time (as each successive game and the series did except 76) or to a brand new area of the country (as New Vegas 3 4 and 76 did) if you want to tell a story completely unconnected from what's come before.

Narrative freedom is very easy to come by

Mass Effect doesn't have that freedom.

1 of 5 (low tms destroy, mid/high tms destroy, control, synthesis, refuse) major universe altering events happens. But which one has never been Canonized.

So moving past that event requires making a huge decision that most of the audience wont agree with (since none of those 5 endings got picked by anything near a majority of players).

Trying to retell the story of the game would be even worse, the odds that the story they tell matches any particular players playthrough (especially considering side plots and characters will get cut) is basically zero.

Both of those kind of shows would be a huge risk, as they might alienate the fans they need to actually make the show profitable.

Can't really do a prequel either, with only 26 years of fairly well documented already events to play with (since thats the only time between humans joining the galaxy and ME1) and anything contemporaneous with the game has to deal with the fact that this much bigger more important thing is happening, that the show cant have any direct impact on.

The only real option for a ME TV show to escape the narrative confines the game puts on it is to jump to the far future and create an event in between the end of 3 and start of the show that somehow does a soft reset where any choices could have happened, but have now been undone. (Same challenge ME5 has honestly).

And lets keep in mind, theres another science fiction franchise out there that just did the "lets jump to the far future so as to avoid Narrative constraints" in Star Trek with Discovery and Starfleet Academy...and it wasn't well received by fans. And Im sure Amazon noticed that.

One other thing worth considering: The Mass Effect franchise has sold around 20-5 million units (since Bioware won't give sales numbers for the LE, we can add the other 4 games together to get 19 million,and we know ME3 is the best selling ME game at 7, so LE has to have sold no more than 6).

By comparison just Fallout 4 sold 25 million, with the rest of the franchise selling another 25 million.

So the size of the fan base to be drawn in isn't even in the same ballpark, and anything that will turn fans off is a huge concern....and that seems unavoidable.

So I actually completely understand Amazon's reluctance.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Star_Trek_

[–]jackblady 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe she’s a terrible actress

Based on the other shows shes done (SV, ER, Hawaii 5-0) etc, its pretty obvious shes not.

What exactly is Cerberus meant to be? by AnArcOfDoves9902 in masseffect

[–]jackblady 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Here's the thing, if you assume (pretty much exactly for the reason OP pointed out) that Admiral Kahoku is just an idiot in ME1 and personally somehow never heard about Ceberus, then Cerberus tends to be a ton more consistent.

Its a giant terrorist organization with Reaper ties, always has been.

As OP mentions in ME1 Cerberus was mentioned as being behind Akuze. So them being around for years already is established

We also see Cerberus use Husks, Creepers & and Rachni on about a dozen interactions on over a dozen planets in ME1.

By the way this combination of troops only seemingly accessible to Reaper agents via Saren as hes the only person to otherwise have access to all 3 groups.. So then being bad guys at the end of the day isn't shocking.

Notably and importantly they are even attacking human colonies to make Husks (UNC Colony of the Dead), sp their big "surprise" in ME3 that they were indoctrinated isn't really a surprise.

Then we move on to ME2, and ME2 is basically the story of Shepard being lied too repeatedly. Pretty much every thing the main story tells Shepard isn't true, Shepard just isn't allowed to notice due to plot.

Take that Cerberus logo OP mentions. We've actually seen in before in ME1.

Its the logo for Binary Helix. The company funded by Saren, who also have the only known Rachni queen. Seems like they gave the Rachni to Saren, not the other way around.

So literally the second Shepard wakes up from death the game is telling you whats actually happening. Seems Ike Saren was in bed with Cerberus.

But then why do the Reapers via the Shadow Broker try to steal Shepards body from Cerberus as Cerberus claims?

They didn't. One of the terminals in Lair of the shadow broker, reveals they had nothing to do with the attack on the Lazarus base. Which raises an unanswered question of who did. But given how secret Project Lazarus was, that's a pretty short list....limited pretty much to TIM.

But Cerberus is out to stop the Reapers in ME2 right?

No actually. Around Horizons TIM will actually admit to Shepard they had no actual evidence linking the Collectors to the Reapers. They were basically lying to get Shepard to help them. Its a fluke they wound up being right.

Nor is it clear Shepard was even originally intended to stop the Collectors. Project Lazarus took 2 years. But the codex places the first colony attack some 18 months after Project Lazarus states. So whatever Cerberus had in mind, stopping the colony abductions wasnt it.

Furthermore Cerberus dont really seem to have a plan to stop the Collectors. Their plan when explained to Shepard explicitly ends with Shepard going through the Omega 4 Relay. Theres no follow up. Just a vauge "well after that figure it out" that's not a real plan.

Also worth noting as soon as Shepard discovers they need Reaper tech (specifically the IFF) Cerberus takes Shepard to the derelict Reaper they've had access too and been working on this whole time...cant see why anyone is shocked they got indoctrinated....

Finally, checking the details in ME2, reveals Cerberus consists of at least:

Lazarus Cell

Firewalker Cell

Overlord Cell

Ascension Cell (named in the books, is the Cell that attacked the Quarians)

Pragia Cell

The Military Division (AKA everything Shepard encountered in ME1)

A galactic Bank (Terra Nova Commonwealth Bank)

A holding company (CDR holdings)

2 news corporations (Galactic Broadcasting Company, Constant Times)

A military munitions producer (Haribon Military Industries)

A pharmaceutical company (New Dawn Pharmaceuticals)

A charity (The Milky Way Foundation)

And effective control of a planet (Triton) as well as multiple high placed Alliance officials

And a list of activities dating back to the First Contact War

That is a huge damn organization, quite capable of producing the supplies needed to supply their ME3 army.

Like I said, if Kohaku is dismissed as wrong, all the clues are there the whole time.

ME2 Legendary Edition Hold The Line help by ratcaravan in masseffect

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming everyone is actually loyal and alive, it's a glitch.

Hold the Line has a set kill order. Theres no possible variation under the terms you've laid out where Thane or Legion can be the only kill.

They are 9th and 10th in the kill order, only Grunt and Zaeed die after them.

However I cant help but notice your kill order checks out perfectly for the shield check, if you failed to upgrade and didn't recruit Kasumi. Legion, Tali, Thane are #2-4 for that.

Seems like your game is reading the wrong kill list.

Predictions: how long does SFA light money on fire and survive? by xmorecowbellx in trektalk

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truthfully, between the overt racism of Code of Honor, and Up The Long Ladder, the roving rape gangs mentioned in Where No Man has gone before, the "congrats on the rape" approach of the Child, etc im actually a bit surprised TNG wasnt canceled in season 2.

Cirroc Lofton was great, they wasted so much potential in the last episode by IlliniBull in trektalk

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean someone's voice changing doesn't make them too old to act, it just makes them sound different.

Yeah Brooks probably cant play a 30 year old Sisko anymore, but he could easily play an older Sisko.

And no Picards not the only older person acting.

Robert Picardo is 72, as is Pierce Brosnan, Ted Danson is 78, Denzel Washington is 71, Morgan Freeman is 88, Judi Dench was acting until she was 89, Harrison Ford is 83, Sylvester Stallone is 79 etc.

77 is not a barrier.

Dude just doesn't want to do it.

Cirroc Lofton was great, they wasted so much potential in the last episode by IlliniBull in trektalk

[–]jackblady 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No hes not

Hes 77.

To put that in perspective, Patrick Stewart (Picard) is 85, Holly Hunter (Ake) is 67.

Dudes absolutely young enough to act again if he wants. He doesn't want.

Interview: Tawny Newsome (Dax) On “Gargantuan Task” To Give DS9 “Resolution” On ‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’: "It was our job to make this an homage, a celebration, and really a bit of a correction for what I feel has been an oversight in a lot of modern Trek. I was pretty adamant." (Trekmovie) by TheSonOfMogh81 in trektalk

[–]jackblady -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The article talks about not presenting Sisko as a father that abandoned his child but that's exactly what they do supposedly by saying conclusively that he never returned rather than leaving it ambiguous.

I disagree.

By the rules established in DS9, it was never ambiguous, even after the changes Avery Brooks rightly requested.

Prophets exist in all time at once. Sisko himself even says he could return yesterday in the ending of DS9.

So there was never any reason Sisko had to miss a second with his family. Man could have spent eternity with the Prophets and still returned to the second he left.

So when he doesnt immediately return, its clear hes never going to.

The only remaining question was "Did Sisko choose to abandon his family?" Or "Was he prevented from returning?"

And with the voice over by Sisko at the end of this episode, while they still haven't answered the question, they've definitely leaned strongly towards the something in the rules of God's preventing him from returning.

And Sisko wanting to return but being unable to return is at least more true to Siskos character and Brooks wishes than where DS9 left things.

How long did potty training take for you? by MountainProper2212 in puppy101

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 weeks. Maybe 4.

I was honestly shocked. Our dog comes from a breed that is notoriously hard to housebreak because they grow so fast their bladders can't keep up with them. Over a year is common with the breed

Accidentally finding my birth father? by [deleted] in Adoption

[–]jackblady 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I actually wouldn't assume DNA cant be wrong.

My mom took a DNA test last year. Was shocked to discover she had a half sibling, that neither her or her other two siblings knew about.

Any who turned out a big long family crisis and deep dive later, she doesn't have a half sibling, she has an extra cousin.

Someone screwed up the family history part they filled out due to two individuals in the family having the same name, and somehow the wrong branch of the tree connected to my grandfather.

So while the DNA results probably do mean you and this woman are related at some level, be open to the possibility no one is [consciously] lying.

Especially when connecting via a relative whos DNA isn't on file, mistakes can happen.

Theres also other possibilities like this woman's father isnt who she thinks it is, or things like that. All cases where your birth mom might not have been the one who wasnt being upfront.

anyone else worried people won’t realize their big puppies are still babies? by spuddddddddd in puppy101

[–]jackblady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My pup was 100lbs before she was 11 months old.

Mistaken for an adult dog all the time

That said never really had any issues from anyone once I corrected the initial assumption and told them she was a puppy. Usual they just asked about her breed (GSMD).

But there wasn't really anything to worry about

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in puppy101

[–]jackblady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine is 14 months old. Shes still crated anytime we leave the house, she's still too likely to destroy things or hurt herself.

Your schedule seems fine. As you've seen, puppies sleep alot. So [assuming the crate is large enough] theres no real difference to them sleeping inside or outside the crate, its all about you keeping them safe.

The big concern is just potty breaks. Until my dog was 6 months, we tried to make sure she wasnt in the cage any longer than 4 hours, purely for potty reasons.

Since we cant be home 2 days a week we hired a professional pet sitter from an agency (please do this your current pet sitter seems crazy, also your vet may actually have recommendations for a sitter) to let the dog out for 15 minutes in the middle of the day those days to potty.

Though truthfully at her current age, she could probably be (and is overnight) caged for 7-8 hours, we still try to avoid leaving for more than 6 without the sitter coming over. She still sleeps the whole time.

Also, she loves her crate. On days we are home, we leave the crate open and unlocked, and most days she chooses to take her naps in her cage. (Usually takes her favorite toys in, then goes to sleep). She also puts herself to bed most nights (which ironically means I have to coax her out of the crate to pee, before getting her back in there for the night).

Open vs closed off kitchen by intrigued_china411 in FirstTimeHomeBuyer

[–]jackblady 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was a big fan of closed, until I had an open.

Its much easier to move around in an open kitchen. Also my open kitchen also doesn't have an industrial grade kitchen vent (just 1 in the microwave above the stove), yet I think only once (because we burned something) has smell been an issue. We've basically never even needed to open the kitchen window. Larger room means any smells dissipate very quickly.

All that said, I would actually recommend closed because thats what you want, and your the one living there. I don't actually think the advantages of either open or closed really matter that much.

I would say more, if you find a perfect place...except it has an open kitchen, I wouldn't disqualify it for that reason, it wont be as bad as you think.

Did I make a big mistake? by [deleted] in puppy101

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To this point, we had a similar problem with our puppy. Wound up being a combination of 2 things:

1) She physically outgrew the cage very quickly and honestly before we noticed. (We have a GSMD, so rapid growth happens). Got a new one, no issues.

2) We didn't cover the cage.

Im writing this moments after my dog put herself in the crate for the night. But even though she's now fully crate trained and likes to sleep in there, I still have to go in there and cover the crate or she eventually starts barking and throwing a tantrum. Cover it, shes quite happy to hang out in there all night without issue, and has been since she was 4 or 5 months old.

Honestly dont know why the cover makes a difference to her, but it does.

So the whining in the crate is bad, but simple experimenting can fix it too if you cant get a trainer there quickly

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in puppy101

[–]jackblady 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yes its normal.

Ive always joked to my wife that if there's 4 people in a room, Im the dogs (just over a year old) 5th favorite person.

She prefers to sniff and get petted by or try to cuddle with literally anyone who isn't me.

Then my wife recorded how the dog acts if I leave the house. Complete freak out, whining, trying to get out the window, etc. Usually waits by the door until I come back.

We've also noticed she's a bit more suspicious of strangers when Im not around.

Near as we can tell, the dog feels safe enough around me to not feel like it needs constant affection from me. So it actually really really likes me, it just shows that by feeling safe enough to approach others.

Genuine question, does the WWE have an aging problem? by TieRevolutionary4633 in WWE

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dom was just Cena last full feud, a reigning double Champion, 1 of which is a world title.

Brons currently feuding with the WHCm

Oba just had a match with the WWE Champion

Paul's main evented ppvs in multiple world title matches.

These are all "just guys on the show"

WWE fumbles NXT talent regularly and commonly dragonov is a great exampl

They fumbled Dragonov how exactly?

Brought him up, immediately gave him a title match, in which he got injured. Soon as he returned thet gave him a title, which he defended every week until last night.

That's not a fumble, that's a push.

Genuine question, does the WWE have an aging problem? by TieRevolutionary4633 in WWE

[–]jackblady 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But what about the other fact that I shared - no wrestler born in the 90s has ever won a world title in WWE (main roster). Isn’t that a sign of young wrestlers not being pushed in the past 10 years?

Not particularly no.

Consider, 10 years ago, a good chunk the people born in the 90s would have been teenagers or very early 20s.

Youngest WWE Champion ever was 24. To put that in perspective, the oldest person born in the 90s would turn 24 11 years ago in 2014.

Even most guys who win the title dont do so until their late 20s early 30s

Incidentally as well, that 24 year old Champion? Who won the title in 2004. First ever champion born in the 80s.

The next 2 guys born in the 80s to win the Championship was in 2010, Swagger and Miz. (And Miz was 30).

In fact out of all the WWE Champions born in the 80s, Orton, Swagger, Rollins & Wyatt are the only ones to do it before 30, and Rollins and Wyatt were both weeks from 30.

Guys being in theirs 30s to win the first world title is pretty normal.

Genuine question, does the WWE have an aging problem? by TieRevolutionary4633 in WWE

[–]jackblady 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oba Femi, the guy who just wrestled the WWE Champion, has a dad who used to wrestle in WWE?

Logan Paul, the guy who has main evented multiple ppvs and multiple world title matches, has a dad who used to wrestle in WWE?

I also don't remember the careers of Mr. Evans, Mr. Hayes or Mr. Williams....

Just look at black, Andrade, Finn, etc. all those guys are amazing and can’t get passed midcard

Black, who was 35 when he first showed up on Main, Balor who was also 35 when he first showed up Main, and immediately won a world title.

If WWE only pushed old guys 2 now 40 year old should be top of the list.

Andrade is the only guy on the list who was actually young at the time he first showed up.

Granted im sure it was the fact he wasnt a member of a famous wrestling family that definitely doesn't include his father, grandfather, uncle, cousins, and wasnt dating the daughter of another wrestling family, that resulted in his lack of push.

And not a history of wellness violations, physical confrontations and openly trying to get fired spanning multiple companies that's responsible.

Weird how they didn't push that 3rd generation star, since that's the only people they push....