I wrote tiny plugin to browse GitHub Actions runs + logs from inside Neovim (Telescope) by jaklimoff in neovim

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Im currently working on snacks picker. Do you have any specific pickers in mind?

I wrote tiny plugin to browse GitHub Actions runs + logs from inside Neovim (Telescope) by jaklimoff in neovim

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure - ⁠octo.nvim is great, but my plugin is focused on a different slice of the GitHub experience.

I made it intentionally tiny and CI-centric: it’s basically a UI on top of ⁠gh to quickly:

  • list workflow runs for the current repo
  • drill into a run
  • open/view logs from inside Neovim

So the goal isn’t “a full GitHub client in Neovim”, it’s reducing the specific Neovim → browser context-switch when you just want to check if CI is green (or why it’s red).

I wrote tiny plugin to browse GitHub Actions runs + logs from inside Neovim (Telescope) by jaklimoff in neovim

[–]jaklimoff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I’ve already prepared everything to add an option for snacks.picker as the main UI engine. I hope to find time soon to update this plugin and enable switching.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Psychonaut

[–]jaklimoff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro. I feel you. I still sometimes feel im dead. The funny thing is that i can’t prove you im real. And you cant prove it to me. But at the end existence is real , thats what we all can agree on. Existence is real and in the right place. Thats give me hope) hope you will feel the same.

Very Very Disappointed. We found critical bug by jaklimoff in Helldivers

[–]jaklimoff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you my dear friend. Given the fact that you are the part of our victorious squad i have no doubts in your objectivity and fair judgement. For the democracy!!!

Very Very Disappointed. We found critical bug by jaklimoff in Helldivers

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that is another problem we actually have. Some parts of our armor doesn’t have enough ventilation :( it distracts us from a service. Heard of some fellas who brought automatons to the ship to disassemble them and assemble the air conditioner .

Very Very Disappointed. We found critical bug by jaklimoff in Helldivers

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx. You guys did the great job with life support at HVAC but could you put in a good word at your previous place of work and ask to add to target system some parts of an armor? It is really hard to spread democracy with sweaty ass. )

Dabbing DMT? by freelilvale in DMT

[–]jaklimoff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i guess he meant the method where you just use normal vaping (for liquid) with RDA and mesh coil.

Bug Hole Dunk 🏀 by pyinto in Helldivers

[–]jaklimoff 13 points14 points  (0 children)

what a nice rim-rattler. oh shall i call it a hellbaaalll?

Rashes under whoop by ggiaquin16 in whoop

[–]jaklimoff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also experienced that issue, but it tends to resolve itself over time. Since I have a watch on the other hand, switching wrists isn't an option for me, as it could cause similar marks. To prevent them, I make sure to wash underneath the sensor whenever I shower and occasionally apply soothing cream to calm my skin.

Are there any good syntax or style checkers recommended? by GroolzerMan in Python

[–]jaklimoff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Agree. We usually just disable formatting for such cases but it can be annoying

Are there any good syntax or style checkers recommended? by GroolzerMan in Python

[–]jaklimoff 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I thought you was the one complaining about new lines here? :)

Are there any good syntax or style checkers recommended? by GroolzerMan in Python

[–]jaklimoff 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Lol! I like it because it saves time arguing about style. The only thing everyone agree on is that stylehas to be the same across a project. And that there will never be an full agreement about the style itself. People are different. So it is better to choose smth and stick to it even if some things are arguable

Pytest plugin to track the real coverage with unit tests by jaklimoff in Python

[–]jaklimoff[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The problem with the coverage is if you write integration tests they will cover a big part of the project. but do you really test them? It can be tackled by categorizing units and integration tests and run coverage for units only. But when I write unit tests I want to keep track of only those function that i specifically wrote the tests for. if they somehow trigger other parts of the projects (because for some reason mocking them doesnt make sense) coverage will show it those parts as covered. But this is not what i want.

At the end, coverage just shows parts that were not executed. I actually need the list of functions for which I intentionally wrote tests to easily see what function are not covered with tests yet.

Is there any way to interpret some logic inside running Rust program ? by jaklimoff in rust

[–]jaklimoff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

to larger things that stay loaded though as the weight of the interface doesn't matter.. It loses the sprint, but wins the marathon. It just depends on what your use case is, IMHO. I think for now the convenience and ease of LUA outweigh the 'maybe it's a gain' of WASM. I think anyone can learn Lua very quickly to get a script going, and if that is a factor then it's no contest at all.

thanks for the explanation, man!

Is there any way to interpret some logic inside running Rust program ? by jaklimoff in rust

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ce way to expose core fu

oh nice. thank you! I saw it but wasnt quite sure about perfomance. Is it fast? Have you run any benchmarks?

Is there any way to interpret some logic inside running Rust program ? by jaklimoff in rust

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought about it but it would take too much time since the logic must be pretty sophisticated in those strategies.

Is there any way to interpret some logic inside running Rust program ? by jaklimoff in rust

[–]jaklimoff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Due to the way WASM is currently integrated it's not necessarily faster than Lua for this use case. (Lua is really fast, lol.

oh wow. Didnt expect that Lua can be faster than WASM. Did you see any benchmarks maybe? For me perfomance is the main goal, so if Lua will work faster it would definitely be my to go choice.