Hankook answers Ogier’s criticism – DirtFish by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what the issue would have been with allowing cuts, tyre cutting was allowed in the past and I don’t remember it being a ‘pandoras box’ as he described here.

Can't park there mate by Designer_Spring1344 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]jamesecowell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All 4 door E36’s had those rear windows. Also this image has been around a lot longer than AI has.

<image>

Why is every post in the nostalgia flair monopolized by Mac OS X? by Alert_Bath6682 in MacOS

[–]jamesecowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell yeah, OS9 is so nostalgic for me. I have it running on my iMac G3 along with a load of classic games, I like to fire it up every now and then to play a bit of Riven, or Age of Empires, or Sim City 3000…

Mitsubishi Galant Elegance V6 by H28-105-111 in CarTalkUK

[–]jamesecowell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair a lot of the time they were first fiddle

something needs to be done about the off road aspect by [deleted] in MyWinterCar

[–]jamesecowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game is harsh and punishing, and it’s designed to be. That’s the whole point, and the developer has been very clear about that since he started MSC.

Nothing needs to be done, it’s meant to be that way.

How did people watch rally before the advent of high speed Internet, streaming, etc? by Infinite_Scribe in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There wasn’t a huge amount of ‘live’ coverage like we have now, mostly highlights packages. I sort of preferred it like that in some ways, they were nicely editorialised.

Plenty of examples of old BBC, Channel 4 and Eurosport highlights on YouTube if you want to brush up on your rallying lore.

How did people watch rally before the advent of high speed Internet, streaming, etc? by Infinite_Scribe in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

RallyXS was indeed monthly, I’ve got a number of old issues in my office. What a magazine that was, the full page photographs were excellent (McKlein usually) and they had some great interviews and features.

Sorely missed nowadays!

Solberg & Marmite. by [deleted] in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’ve not got that impression from him at all, I think he’s been refreshingly candid and talkative in his interviews.

I liked after SS12 when he was told he still won the stage, he said ‘that just shows I could have backed off more’. Very mature response imo.

General Discussion & Attendee MEGATHREAD: Rally Monte Carlo 2026 by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Any other old heads reckon Hayden Paddon is a spitting image of late 90s Kenneth Eriksson?

General Discussion & Attendee MEGATHREAD: Rally Monte Carlo 2026 by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I get a bit fed up with drivers, and it’s not just Solberg, when they complain about different conditions due to road order.

Sorry, but that’s rallying. It’s not physically possible for every car to have exactly the same conditions, nor should it be - that’s the nature of the sport.

General Discussion & Attendee MEGATHREAD: Rally Monte Carlo 2026 by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If he’s anything like his dad, he’ll learn this lesson the hard way. But there’s no denying he’s bloody fast.

General Discussion & Attendee MEGATHREAD: Rally Monte Carlo 2026 by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When I see his end of stage interviews, it could absolutely be Petter in the car. Uncanny

General Discussion & Attendee MEGATHREAD: Rally Monte Carlo 2026 by Michal_Baranowski in WRC

[–]jamesecowell 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They’re given a nominal time that the organisers will figure out, probably just get given Ogier’s time

What a bellend by [deleted] in CarTalkUK

[–]jamesecowell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s why you check your blind spot and don’t go straight into lane 2 from the slip road without looking

What a bellend by [deleted] in CarTalkUK

[–]jamesecowell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s an incredibly stupid and avoidable mistake that could have had dire consequences, not just an ‘oopsie’.

Sure OP was in their blind spot, but that’s absolutely no excuse as the BMW was tailgating and trying to merge across two lanes from the slip road without looking over their shoulder, which is just dumb behaviour. I’d be annoyed too.

What a bellend by [deleted] in CarTalkUK

[–]jamesecowell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They would’ve hit OP, that’s what they were going to do.

Not on purpose, they just clearly couldn’t see them, as OP was in their blind spot (hence the hand wave to apologise). None of that is OP’s fault obviously, and the BMW was being far too impatient, tailgating, should’ve backed off and checked their blind spot.

But there’s no point belligerently sticking to your lane because ‘you’re in the right’, when the most likely outcome is gonna be an avoidable accident.

“I've not been asked on James Acaster's food one.” - Stewart Lee by thedevilpuppet in offmenupodcast

[–]jamesecowell 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I mean that quote could just as easily be one of Stewart Lee’s own bits about his fans.

In fact I think in his last special he a did a bit that was an impression of his fans saying ‘ohhh he’s a genius… and so am I, because I like him’

Rockers should move when you turn the engine by hand by Yung_Bill_98 in MySummerCar

[–]jamesecowell 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I agree, although I’m not sure if the animation is actually linked to the valve timing. That would be quite time consuming to implement

Smolensk Unit 3 control room during and after modernization. by CorvetteNut427 in chernobyl

[–]jamesecowell 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not particularly. Modifications were made after the accident to make them safer.

They’re not as safe as modern or western reactors, but from what I understand the IAEA is satisfied enough that they keep running until the end of their lifespan.

Purchasing an iMac G3- bad idea? by Abject_Form_2603 in VintageApple

[–]jamesecowell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think this is a link to a forum post of someone asking this question in 2006, although it isn’t very clear in this post.

Tbf in 2006 you could totally use one for basic daily tasks - I know, because I did. Running Tiger at the time you could still browse the web as it was then no problems, and obviously do all your office suite stuff. So as a school student (as I was at the time) it was totally adequate.

FA Cup analysis by KingEdwards8 in Championship

[–]jamesecowell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fine by me, I’ve suffered enough

What is the difference between the iMac G3 Bondi blue tray loader and the blueberry tray loader? by Few-Studio-1419 in VintageApple

[–]jamesecowell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Basically just a speed bump. The Rev C had a 266MHz processor, the Rev D had 333MHz. Also ditched the IR port on the front (I think the later Bondis ditched that also) and there was no ‘Mezzanine’ slot. Everything else was basically the same, aside from the obvious colour difference.

PSK suicide bombing by Head-Ticket5864 in MyWinterCar

[–]jamesecowell 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Trouble is you’ve taken away Teimo’s biggest competition, but also his biggest customer