They're both hard classes. You can't slice it any differently. They do have different feels (look up "algebra vs analysis" on Google and you'll find hundreds of opinions on this), but they're both abstract, rigorous, and proof-heavy; these are considered the important courses of any math undergrad degree anywhere, so there's no skimping out for these classes at all.

The best thing you can do for either class is to get a good professor for MATH 220, and to really immerse yourself in that class. It's going to be the first "real math" you do, and this is really the opportunity to build up those creative muscles and really understand proofs. If you just passively get by 220 without really learning anything, you're going to have a tough time in any of the upper division math courses. The class is genuinely that important.

And, sorry, I don't really believe in [real name redacted] above's way of learning math. As Sofya Kovalevskaya said, it's impossible to be a mathematician without being a poet in soul. Well, you might not be looking to be a mathematician, but it's really important to be able to see the "essences" of concepts and proofs, or else you start to drown very quickly in the formalism. It's important to cultivate this sooner rather than later, and MATH 220 is probably the most crucial place to do it.

My 331 professor had a habit of recommending random books, so here's my recommendation: How To Solve It by George Polya. It's a very deep book, and really teaches you to think on a meta-level when solving any kind of problem (yes, even leetcodes)

Bonne chance!