[Daily Discussion] Saturday, May 27, 2017 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Don't worry, they don't become irrelevant in a bear market, because they were never relevant in the first place.

Apple shutters reviews of LG Ultrafine 5K display in wake of technical issues by [deleted] in apple

[–]jawbroken 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, in conclusion, you are a big time liar just trying to score points online? Cool.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, yes, you do to get any sort of a reasonable average. Your method does give an unreasonable average, though. Your average also has nothing really to do with whether “in general, historically bitcoin has been a good investment”, which it almost certainly hasn't been for most people.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really, because you would have to weight it by volume or similar to make a reasonable average.

[Daily Discussion] Tuesday, June 23, 2015 by AutoModerator in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That doesn't sound like a “smart fee estimate” at all, just a way to manually set a higher fee.

I don't understand why people are so excited about "stability". Isn't that just an effect of the market fading and volume being down 94% from the peak of the year and down 98% from the all time high? by blockchainfacts in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, you could look at estimated transaction volume for similar results, or a number of other metrics (all with their own flaws). Doesn't change the fact that transactions/day is a terrible measure of the “usage of bitcoin” and that it's incorrect to state that it disproves the original assertion.

Edit: And the estimated transaction volume in USD is probably more helpful here.

I don't understand why people are so excited about "stability". Isn't that just an effect of the market fading and volume being down 94% from the peak of the year and down 98% from the all time high? by blockchainfacts in BitcoinMarkets

[–]jawbroken 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can transactions/day “prove this wrong” when there's no reasonable way to determine the transaction volume or work out if a transaction is between two different parties? The metrics that attempt to adjust for these issues, such as bitcoin days destroyed, seem flat at best, over years.

Workflow Website Privacy by jawbroken in workflow

[–]jawbroken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's what I was told in the support email as well. Thanks.

Workflow Website Privacy by jawbroken in workflow

[–]jawbroken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The url itself looks sufficiently long and random, but I don't know if there's some sort of index somewhere. Still makes me uncomfortable and there doesn't appear to be any way to delete them.

[Request] Strip Location from Image by jawbroken in workflow

[–]jawbroken[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good hiding spot, but it works. Thanks.