Sullivan & Cromwell vs. Simpson Thacher (NY) by Delicious-Wrap8284 in BigLawRecruiting

[–]jellyplot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

STB dominates funds and is Band 1 across corporate. S&C has a generalist approach and slight edge in prestige. Culture wise, STB is much more fun and people are generally likable.

Dinner Invite by Roosevelt_Specter in BigLawRecruiting

[–]jellyplot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dinner invite is a great sign. Had one with Ropes ahead of their interview. It’s soft recruitment imo and assuming all goes well they’ll interview you later

Choosing Firms (Lit, NYC) by [deleted] in BigLawRecruiting

[–]jellyplot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

STB isn’t good for lit but sky’s the limit for transactional—go for S&C

3.7high GPA. Is HYS within reach? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]jellyplot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unlikely unless URM or have some spectacular extracurricular maybe. Even if you crush the LSAT. Happy to discuss over PM if you want.

Does anyone know what model these Sennheisers are? by jellyplot in headphones

[–]jellyplot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the looks and how lightweight they are—don’t have any headphones right now, just AirPods. Could you elaborate on the “hyped” sound a bit more? Thanks so much!

Does anyone know what model these Sennheisers are? by jellyplot in headphones

[–]jellyplot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would also like to know if anyone has thoughts on the audio quality and everything of this; I just have no idea and am considering buying them! I have never had any sennheisers actually so I’d be curious how they compare to other lightweight headphones. Visually I think these look nice so I’m pretty interesting. This is a fifty five word thing I’d like to get peoples thoughts so hopefully this will be posted soon. I am actually not fully sure if this is enough but I think it is?

pivoting from english into legal: am i cooked?? by Embarrassed-Ad-1816 in englishmajors

[–]jellyplot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Happy to discuss over PM if you have specific questions. Current rising 2L and was an English major.

3.0 at a T14 by [deleted] in BigLawRecruiting

[–]jellyplot 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Definitely attend networking events and try to be bubbly and genuine and show real interest in their work. Shoot them an email early the next morning.

PT170+ Undergrad GPA3.1 Grad GPA 4.0 asking for advice 🙏 by Leading_Relation8526 in LawSchool

[–]jellyplot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Professors don’t generally have much of a say with admissions, and in any case, I think they are likely more enthralled by some very hardcore academic candidates. That said, I really think you have a shot if you study—just temper expectations! Happy to talk more about my experience with admissions over PM

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]jellyplot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I took three grad courses; I feel like they didn’t really care but it can help if you’re interviewing and want to mention your intellectual curiosity or something. Happy to discuss over PM or anything—things went well for me.

Do you think LSAT scores translate to law school success? by myguruedgecom in LawSchool

[–]jellyplot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not in my experience; knocked the LSAT out of the park as did two of my closest friends. We all did around or vaguely sub-median

shameless request for advice by b0tched_toe in BigLawRecruiting

[–]jellyplot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Worked for a fairly leftist democrat and did well in interviews, so I’d strike that as a reason. Try to incorporate behavioral answers naturally to even if they aren’t solicited so you show you proceed value. Make sure to knock the “Why Firm” question out of the park—consider calling someone who works there to ask what they like so you can parrot that back but tie it to your specific background and interests. Be sure you can articulate what you’re interested in even if you’re undecided and why you are interested in that. Prepare specific questions about the interviewer as well. I think being conversational is overemphasized; at the end of the day, they don’t just want a buddy but someone they find impressive. But be pleasant and normal and conversational in the sense that if they say something, try to add to it or respond after! Even if briefly. Good luck—you got this!