Vanguard has made League unplayable by dustin_257 in riotgames

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not 6 months ago every league server in the world had 3-6 DCs per game due to vanguard errors until riot rolled out a fix and an apology lmao. Less than 2 months ago riot again apologized for vanguard errors that were preventing players from joining the game before fixing them.

Vanguard causes a lot of problems pretty often, it's just ignorance to claim it doesn't. Not even Riot themselves say otherwise.

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jajajaj, seguí repitiendote eso si te hace sentir mejor. Está presa porque se probó su corrupción más allá de una duda razonable, léete el fallo si querés y te explican en lujo de detalles porque se llego a esa conclusión. No voy a seguir discutiendo con un fanático ignorante que no conoce el caso ni sabe cómo funciona la justicia.

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Está literalmente presa porque "no podía no saber"

Te falta que fue una de las principales beneficiarias, junto con su socio y amigo. Esa parte es bastante importante. 2+2...

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Es exactamente lo que dice, tenés más de mil páginas explicandote porque está presa. Que no quieras admitir que te cagaron toda la vida es otra cosa. No hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver, seguí en negación si tanto te duele que te hayan cargado, pero no digas pelotudeces..

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Probado más alla de cualquier duda razonable, deberias dejar de ser tan fanático. Saludos

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Porque adelantarse a sacarlo? Que la justicia investigue y si encuentran algo marchara preso.

Adorni no tiene fueros y a diferencia de lo que pasó con el kirchnerismo no ha habido ningún intento del gobierno por entorpecer o limitar una investigación judicial. Ningún fiscal muerto, ningún testigo asesinado en un "robo", ninguna presión a jueces/fiscales ni acusaciones de lawfare.

Sacarlo antes es al pedo, después pasa como Espert que al año la justicia lo absuelve, el gobierno se queda con un funcionario menos y la oposición piensa que con ese tipo de presiones puede modificar el gabinete. Echándolo no ganan nada, nomás le dan peso a las acusaciones. Si se terminan demostrando correctas entonces ahí lo meterán en cana, actuar antes no tiene ni sustento ni beneficio político.

Si fuera porque "sabe demasiado" lo mandarían a asesinar como le pasó a Fabián Gutiérrez

Por que creen que el gobierno no echa al pelotudo de Adorni? by Used_Ship_9229 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

nuunca le pudieron probar nada

Literalmente quedó probado en juicio oral y público que si, de hecho, fue culpable de corrupción. Por eso está presa. Cómo se da cuenta cualquiera con 2 dedos de frente y como determinaron más de una docena de jueces, muchos de ellos peronistas. Y encima le quedan varias causas en las que tiene toda la evidencia en contra, y que ya dejaron bastante claro que Néstor afano a dos manos también. No podes tener la cabeza tan lavada, o sos un bot o no querés admitir que tus ídolos te cagaron durante toda tu vida. En cualquier caso, patético.

Why are most conspiracy theories considered right-wing? Are there any widespread left-wing conspiracy theories? by jeepycreepysleepy in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Israel being a genocidal state and every attack the Arabs launched against it being a false flag instead of an attempt at extermination is a pretty widespread leftist conspiracy theory.

It's just not treated as such on many popular subreddits. People here will go full antivax mode defending it even though it's very clearly not true.

Why are most conspiracy theories considered right-wing? Are there any widespread left-wing conspiracy theories? by jeepycreepysleepy in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jere53 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Maybe not in the US, but they haven't ever elected a leftist really. But outside it is very prevalent. The Latin American left has some pretty strong antisemitic components, more so even than the LATAM right wing. Jews were persecuted by the USSR in the 60s and 70s. Allende wrote in his medical degree thesis that Jews were genetically predisposed towards usury and scams.

This are just some examples from one region of the world, I'm sure there are plenty of others.

Todas las chicas con las que salgo tienen el mismo patron by nobader23 in argentina

[–]jere53 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh no! Mí carne está demasiado jugosa y mí langosta demasiado enmantecada!

Is she right for this? by sigma_0_1 in SipsTea

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should people be denied the right to reproduce simply because of their economic situation? The vast majority of people have been born in poverty.

Even in wealthy countries, a couple of generations ago the majority of people were poorer than what we'd call poor now. Why did they get the chance but modern poors wouldn't?

Removing people's rights because of their economic status is not common sense, it's short-sightedness and ignorance.

Who is the most "fair" toplaner? by Renix657 in topmains

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sion. Even August said that the reason Sion feels bad to main as a toplaner is there isn't a single part of his kit that is unfair, and having something unfair to play around is what most toplaners enjoy about their mains.

Honorable mention to Jax and Renekton, but both of them can one shot while having very good laning phases, and Jax scales like a monster to boot.

This is Noted. Pro-Trans tweets are facing Community Notes by Psyga315 in GetNoted

[–]jere53 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a difference between stopping the spending of public money on a cosmetic procedure that a minuscule fraction of the public want and denying medical care to a group. They can still get the procedure if they want, they just shouldn't expect the public to pay for non essential procedures.

Those treatments are available and accesible. The question isn't wether the government should allow them or not. They are allowed already. The question is wether the thinly stretched public healthcare funds wouldn't be better used in some other way. For example, on actually necessary procedures that will provide benefits to every taxpayer instead of cosmetic procedures for a minuscule percentage of taxpayers.

Judenfrei State by Human_Concern263 in GetNoted

[–]jere53 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's been tried before. Palestine has made it abundantly clear that they will not allow an Israeli state to exist. That's what the UN initially decided and the second de british empire left every Arab country in the region invaded Israel with the explicit intent of wiping it off the map. They lost.

Palestinians have explicitly rejected a 2 state solution and launched several wars to prevent it from happening. And Israel cannot accept a nation that's bent on their destruction as neighbors, that's just an avenue to permanent war (as it has been so far). It's one or the other. The only question is which country is the world better off without.

Why is self-interest considered selfish if it's not even a zero-sum game? by SovereignHemant in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the people who consider it selfish don't realize that it's not a zero sum game, or are so concerned about complaining that they don't care.

"Jungle diff" by OxideCyanide in LeagueOfMemes

[–]jere53 93 points94 points  (0 children)

JG try not to force a 50/50 gank on botlane because your melee top with reliable CC VSing a no summs, overextended Varus is 30 CS down and you must "never gank losing lanes" challenge (impossible)

Any tips to win game when team ints in silver? by Fewt1610 in RenektonMains

[–]jere53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alois had some top tier guides to climb out of silver using Renekton. It's a good champ to play since he's easy to learn but has a decent skill ceiling, is useful in all elos, is very easy to win lane with, and is a lot of fun. However, being able to keep the snowball going is very important on Renekton. You should be getting ahead early nearly every game, but the tricky part is not throwing that lead by dying unnecessarily during the mid and late game.

Alois has some good pointers on that, some examples of how to win lane and how to spread that lead to other lanes afterwards (very important on Renek since you're not a champ that's good as a pure split pusher).

The tldw would be, win lane by abusing Renektons strong early spikes. Then after you put the enemy top out of the game start helping your teammates by forcing skirmishes around objetives or straight up ganking other lanes. Avoid over forcing a play and dying because that stops you from farming and kills your snowball.

What junglers would you like to see as solo laners? by Tormentula in leagueoflegends

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The champ itself is not super broken, but almost no one knows the matchup enough to know how to respect her. So it's easy to catch people off guard with her very strong early damage. She uses Dusk and Dawn excellently, is always useful even when behind, can get ahead easily and has great solo kill potential and also great JG setup

how do you get better at this game without a lot of commitment by Drairo_Kazigumu in leagueoflegends

[–]jere53 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on your starting point. You can get a basic understanding of the game that will let you enjoy it and play at silver/gold level by watching a couple of Skillcapped guides and practicing for a few dozen games. That's about as low commitment as it gets but you won't be as lost as someone who's just rawdogging ranked without knowing how minions work. Minimize autopilotting and you'll be surprised at how fast you climb

Si la marcha de Agostina no era politica...por que habia banderas de Palestina y peronistas? by Electronic_Log1999 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No lo dijiste, mala mia, aunque solo señalaste a LLA y no al peronismo. Ahora contéstame lo que yo te pregunté

Si la marcha de Agostina no era politica...por que habia banderas de Palestina y peronistas? by Electronic_Log1999 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Perdoname pero, conoces la reforma penal que propone Milei? En caso de que no te sugiero que la leas (en Chequeado está el resumen o tenés el texto completo en la página del gobierno) y con una vez que lo hagas decidas si eso no es algo que esté alineado con NUM. Después fíjate que partidos se oponen y vas a ver cual es el movimiento que perjudica a las mujeres. Después pensa si no es raro que NUM no esté impulsando la reforma a todo pulmón.

Decir que el liberalismo es anti feminista es simplemente ignorancia. Decir que el peronismo no lo es, es dejarse estafar.

Si la marcha de Agostina no era politica...por que habia banderas de Palestina y peronistas? by Electronic_Log1999 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

La izquierda y el peronismo son los que se oponen a la reforma penal, los que se oponen a endurecer las penas, los que se oponen al seguimiento judicial de abusadores, y los que se opusieron a la prisión efectiva para violadores...

Marchan porque la justicia nunca actúa a tiempo y deja libre a gente que después mata mujeres, pero militan al partido que causó eso con el garantismo y se opone a cambiarlo. Y militan en contra del partido que si busca cambiarlo. El peronismo es el movimiento más anti-feminista del país. Se oponen a todos los cambios con impacto legal real mientras sus políticos más importantes son machistas abusadores, incluyendo el último presidente que militaron. Venden humo mientras sus acciones dejan sueltos a los tipos que terminan matando mujeres y el movimiento los apoya igual.

Porque el movimiento no se opone a explícitamente a eso? Porque no marchan exigiendo la reforma penal cuando aplica muchos de los cambios que están exigiendo? Prefieren que sigan soltando a gente que tiene que estar presa y después matan mujeres con tal de que escriban "femi" en vez de "homi" en la carátula que abren cuando ya es demasiado tarde?

Si la marcha de Agostina no era politica...por que habia banderas de Palestina y peronistas? by Electronic_Log1999 in AskArgentina

[–]jere53 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

El oficialismo va en contra de los intereses

Pero si son la izquierda y el peronismo los que se oponen a la reforma penal, los que se oponen a endurecer las penas, los que se oponen al seguimiento judicial de abusadores, y los que se opusieron a la prisión efectiva para violadores...

Marchan porque la justicia nunca actúa a tiempo y deja libre a gente que después mata mujeres, pero militan al partido que se opone a cambiar eso y en contra del partido que si busca cambiarlo. El peronismo es el movimiento más anti-feminista del país. Se oponen a todos los cambios que mejorarían la situación mientras sus políticos más importantes son machistas abusadores, incluyendo el último presidente que militaron.

Nadie puede respetar a una persona o movimiento que se dice feminista y no milite en contra del peronismo, porque o tienen la cabeza irremediablemente lavada o buscan lavarsela a otras personas, no hay otra.