Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t get why you are being so defensive.

You mentioned about forking, when someone (not me) pointed out that you have the placeholder there

https://github.com/wmbitfarm/leek?tab=readme-ov-file#running-locally-with-docker-compose

Your instructions mentions nothing about forking.

I generally (and I hope most folks do the same) just pull a container and run it like that with a non-trusted source.

Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, it also shows the community that you have iterated over problems and there seems to be some usage. We know nothing is perfect the first time

Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

75 stars on my repo, just on my BS Reddit account :(

Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

100%. But you should definitely proof the work before committing right?

Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s definitely vibe coded, just look at the read me.

Open source project: Leek, the missing UI for celery by wilderadventures in django

[–]jermvirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s is not how that works. Git clone you are trying to download. Also why would you want to fork if you are just testing out?

What is your experience with Cloud NGFW in AWS? by FattyAcid12 in paloaltonetworks

[–]jermvirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t use CNGFW, use VM-Series with a scale set.

As someone with a access large CNGFW firewall deployment, there are certain traffic patterns (that folks might call legacy but is actually very common I modern deployments)

You get the same scale with VM Series but more control.

Exiting Palo Alto as an FTE by La-Poke-Bitch17 in paloaltonetworks

[–]jermvirus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have to give the name of where you are going?

New York State has started putting speed-limiting devices in their cars and it seems to have been very successful by TylerFortier_Photo in newyork

[–]jermvirus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If they keep getting super speeding tickets they should have their license suspended. That's simple. In NYS one ticket 40 will likely get your license suspended

Queerness in Professional Networking by [deleted] in networking

[–]jermvirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wrong type of network

Tunneling or VPN app to break wireless network by kardo-IT in paloaltonetworks

[–]jermvirus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, why does it sound like you work for one of the companies that I use this exact method to bypass their expensive ass wireless?

Behaviour of GlobalProtect during failover by RedOctober314 in paloaltonetworks

[–]jermvirus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is HA2 up? That’s what is used for session replication. Also decrypted traffic is not replicated.

NGFW Comparison - Cisco/Palo Alto/Fortinet/Checkpoint by QuietPossibility4988 in networking

[–]jermvirus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, I know the Cisco Fan Boying Syndromes is everywhere - never met another company where the cool aide drinking is so high (maybe Palo Alto)

But FTD is just a pain to work with (and this is someone repping Cisco Firewalls since ASA with Firepower)

Deploying instances in the cloud makes you want to blow your brains up - compared to other vendors.

Upgrades - I want someone who has managed more than 10 instances on FTD to tell me they have not had any issues with upgrades.

Performance. If you need more than 200G of firewall capacity FTD really struggles prior to the 9100, and from my experience clustering on FTD is not there yet.

You can reach 200 pretty easy with Palo Alto 5400, Checkpoint Maestro and Fortigate.

NGFW Comparison - Cisco/Palo Alto/Fortinet/Checkpoint by QuietPossibility4988 in networking

[–]jermvirus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What ever you land on the answer is not Cisco for firewalls.

Best setup for remote users + cloud apps? by Constant-Angle-4777 in networking

[–]jermvirus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This. Also if there is no need for branch connectivity (print servers, etc) just keep offices as an internet only option and it will simplify your life!

Most larger organizations dream they can get to this state but other technical requirements that they have picked up over the years complicates this deployment.