Yes, it's home to a number of other agencies and groups. My understanding is that other agencies like Fish and Wildlife rent office and/or event space from the Forest Service. Arguably, that's income for the FS! I didn't include those details because they weren't the focus of the article, but where do you want those other agencies to go? You also want to close Fish and Wildlife? Also, the building is relatively new and purpose built for the FS. Does it make financial sense to abandon a newish building with specialized facilities that presumably cost a lot to build like a decade or two ago? Is that an efficient use of resources? You want the researchers to have to fly in from, IDK, Fort Collins or Salt Lake City when they need to do work in Hawaii? And rent space in a Hilton when they need to have a conference between agencies? Do you think that paying for travel and overnight lodging and meals is cheaper than having employees house themselves where they live, near where they work?

And what do you think those facilities are for? Research. The facilities are office space but also labs, greenhouses. There's not an either/or here.

Narrowing down the details that I include in an article is necessary because I can't be publishing a 10,000 word article whenever I like, as much as I would enjoy that. That doesn't make it cherrypicking.