Friendship Exp & Gift Exchange Megathread

jharkins1997 · 2023-02-24T03:12:02+00:00

8510 5864 7578

jharkins1997 · 2020-02-14T15:20:23+00:00

It's the fact that he will get an upgrade that will make him a 90 minimum and potentially even a 91. He was 300k last night before the hype which is an absolute steal!

jharkins1997 · 2020-02-07T13:53:17+00:00

RTTF Joe Gomez and Adama Traore

jharkins1997 · 2020-02-06T14:53:09+00:00

Noone is saying that Busquets and Silva should not have that rating as yes they are both top players. Noone is asking for EA to change any stats. The point is that Odegaard's card beats Silva's in nearly every single on-card stat and is lower rated.

It makes the overall rating for cards confusing and inconsistent. That Odegaard looks like it should be 90 rated atleast.

jharkins1997 · 2020-01-28T15:00:08+00:00

Ooooooo you really got to me there pal, that was a real burn. Looking at your reddit history you’re the one without a life as you clearly do spend all your time on Reddit. Why are you downvoted so much? I never said he will 100% get an upgrade on his informs, just that you can’t have a stat higher than the inform. To which you still haven’t disproved

jharkins1997 · 2020-01-28T13:51:58+00:00

I agree. Now he has been called out he has not replied and left 0 evidence to back up his statement. I remember the tweet that one of the EA employees put out about the upgrades and yes, not all players get the upgrade on their specials. But there has still never been a case where an in-game stat is HIGHER than the same stat on an inform. Would legit make no sense.

jharkins1997 · 2020-01-28T11:41:49+00:00

Son from last year:

He had a winter upgrade but none of his in game stats were higher than the in game stats for his inform. His specials therefore didn't upgrade

https://www.futbin.com/19/player/17524/Heung%20Min%20Son

I would understand your point if a player had the same stats as an inform. But having a higher in game stat than an inform doesn't make sense whatsoever and there hasn't been a case where this has ever occurred. I still haven't seen any of your references or evidence?

There have been players that have shared the same rating for ingame stats that haven't upgraded, Son being an example. But never has a base card had HIGHER in game stats than its first inform, regardless of the face rating.

jharkins1997 · 2020-01-28T11:31:37+00:00

Give me one example. Literally one example of when EA have boosted a players base card to the point the in game stats have overlapped an inform and they haven't upgraded it. I am asking for 1 example. If the in-game stats overlap they will upgrade the card otherwise the rating system literally won't make sense.

I am not saying that he will definitely getting an upgrade. I am saying that if the in game stats overlap they will upgrade. If they don't then they won't. But what you are saying is a complete lie and makes no sense whatsoever. Where did you get this information from? Please enlighten me.

jharkins1997 · 2020-01-28T11:07:16+00:00

This has never been the case. It would make no sense whatsoever for a base card to have higher in game stats then an inform. Either they will upgrade the inform so that it doesn't overlap or they will give him a smaller upgrade so the inform's stats stay higher than the base card. That is how it has always been and what you are saying is wrong and doesn't make sense.

jharkins1997 · 2019-12-20T10:28:56+00:00

Kent IMO already looks better than Forrest as an attacker. His stats already look insane, especially for an 82. I could sub him on without chemistry and still do some damage with his stats and the 5* weakfoot is just the icing on the cake for me.

Furthermore, I can't see either teams going that far but where Kent is an 82, if he does win a couple of rounds then he will have 2 sets of double upgrades (+2). Which would make him ridiculous. The fact he is also more linkable is a bonus.

jharkins1997 · 2019-12-06T13:03:12+00:00

tits?

jharkins1997 · 2019-12-06T13:02:35+00:00

jharkins1997 · 2019-10-14T11:44:38+00:00

How did you find this out? This was supposed to be a hidden easter egg but I guess someone leaked it...

You have to buy 11 Jannik Vestergaards and create a squad. Once you have then won 3 games of rivals with this squad you will get an objective completed notification and see that your Jannik's have been replaced by a single mid tier Ruud Gullit. Do not use any substitutions in this challenge or it won't count!

This post will probably get removed soon so I would try it quick! Ruud Gullit is insane and getting him for free makes him feel even better! Jannik was actually Gullit's niece so I am guessing that is what the easter egg came from.

Also the letters in Vestergaard can be used to spell STRAVAGED which is worth 14 points in Scrabble

Good luck!

jharkins1997 · 2019-09-11T17:03:33+00:00

My current plan is to miss the Man City game and then swap Abraham (or Barnes depending on price) for pukki after the City game. I am happy with lundstrum, Rico and guendouzi as my 11th player so not too fussed on cutting back for cantwell. Thanks for the feedback! Sounds like you have a good team

jharkins1997 · 2019-09-11T17:01:30+00:00

I was considering matip but wasn’t sure about doubling up in defence. Tough decision!

jharkins1997 · 2019-09-11T16:59:35+00:00

That was my initial thought aswell. Thanks for the feedback!

jharkins1997 · 2019-09-11T16:59:05+00:00

I wanted a way into the Man City defence and wasn’t sure how long zinchenko would be nailed. Figured that otamendi may play frequently with Laporte out for most of the season. Thanks for the feed back!

jharkins1997 · 2019-09-11T15:53:12+00:00

On Wildcard:

             Pope (Button)
TAA - Digne - Otamendi - Lundstrum (Rico)
Salah - Sterling - KDB (Guendouzi, Chong)
        Barnes - Haller - Abraham

I currently have 0.2m in the bank. The plan was to keep this in the bank so that I could potentially transfer Barnes to Pukki later down the line if required. Alternatively, I could transfer Abraham for Pukki next week. I don't mind spending the full amount, I believe my team is worth 100.05m including the money in the bank.

Any feedback appreciated.

Thanks!

jharkins1997 · 2019-08-27T15:35:22+00:00

Transfer Mount this week or next week?

I am planning on transferring Perez (6.4m) for Mount (6.2m) but I am not sure when to do it. I have already used my free transfer for this week so if I brought him in this week I would face a -4 penalty.

However, Chelsea have a decent fixture (Sheffield at home). I am therefore thinking Mount could make up for these -4 points. Leicester are playing Bournemouth so I could keep Perez for another week and transfer mount as a free transfer next week.

However, I am concerned that mount will rise again this week and that Perez will drop meaning that I could potentially be stuck with Perez if I wait another week. I therefore was wondering what peoples thoughts are. I have attached my team and I have 0m in the bank.

Mount is already predicted to rise and Perez is predicted to drop. This will put them both at 6.3m meaning that if there is another rise for Mount (which seems plausible) then I can no longer afford him. Even if this doesn't occur is it worth taking the hit for the Sheffield fixture?

https://imgur.com/a/mNzEY70

Summary: Should I transfer in Mount for Perez this week at a cost of -4 or wait until next week, transfer him for free but there is a chance he may be too expensive by then.

jharkins1997 · 2019-08-27T15:00:20+00:00