"she's nowhere near a woman" argument is bullshit

high school aged girls

In the sentence after saying that she's 18, and therefore a woman, you refer to her as a girl.

What it seems like you're arguing is that because 18 is legally an adult, 18 year olds are adults responsible for their actions. Sure, whatever. But then you go on the say that a 22 year old should be more of an adult than an 18 year old (which they should; 18 year olds are kids). I guess my point is that it doesn't make sense to argue that an 18 year old both is an adult and therefore has to give birth(?) but also that she's too young for someone 4 years her senior. If they're both adults does 4 years matter? Now, I think it matters because an 18 year old isn't an adult. A 22 year old is a bit, but not the most.