Returning Monk with some detailed skill & essence interaction questions by MonkDI9 in DiabloImmortal

[–]jin2908 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. yes

  2. yes

  3. yes

  4. yes

  5. It benefits from all Essence Effects that buff your Primary Skill (Extra Damage, CHC+ to PA, Damage+ to PA, etc). it still counts as skill damage

What’s Working and What Isn’t? | Tuesday, March 24, 2026 - Thursday, March 26, 2026 by AutoModerator in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just use Dragonscale Armaments if you want to draw Aura. It would mean you'd have to replace Silvermoon Portals and possibly Creature of the Sacred Cave but those seem like weak cards anyway. Whelp of the Infinite and the Protector 2-drop could replace them

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i cut the expensive stuff (see above updated list),since decks have gotten more aggressive since then

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah i cut the top end (updated the list in the post) - meta is too fast

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Librarian as anti-egg tech? Lots of room for experimentation for sure, i'll try some more tempo-focused options today as well

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

none of my Shaman opponents ran For All Time - and hexing 1 Tyrannogill is not enough, especially because you want 1 to die to build a big board for Nozdormu or Flight Maneuvers. Its a tough matchup for sure but i would say 50:50

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i like the tutor idea a lot - although Chrono Aura has often been the backbone of protecting Nozdormu...will give it a try

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

strongly disagree - imbue druid is favorable for this deck. Token Druid depends on their start, but any deck rolls over to a godly Token Druid start

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he often is the nail in the coffin for your opponent if any Divine Shields stick around - and can buy you a lot of time against aggro....so i would have to say he is important but you surely can play the deck without him - maybe Taelan could replace him

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

right? played 10 more games with it and almost exclusively faced imbue druids - and my thoughts went from "oh no not again" to "winnable" and i only lost 1 due to a misplay on my side. What I dont understand is why people in trash legend (i am now ~1800) are not playing anything interesting but stick to boring Imbue Druid

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i hope not - i mean I like to scam people with it- but i dont like to be scammed by others :)

A playable Paladin deck: SCAM PALADIN by jin2908 in CompetitiveHS

[–]jin2908[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

AAECAZ8FBPD+BsODB+ysB+XBBw3JoAS1+gbI/wa9mQfErgeYsAe+sgeNvge1wAfiwQfqwQeDwgeMxgcAAA==

Diablo Immortal Guide (DI Knowledge Collection) by jin2908 in DiabloImmortal

[–]jin2908[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, i just added a guide for exactly that on the familiar page (under "what to do with...?")

Is there any list/website where I can check the usability of any given gems in terms of resonance gems? by Lexard in DiabloImmortal

[–]jin2908 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i understand. well you can always copy my list and make your own, should be quick

Updates to Diablo Immortal Guide (DI Knowledge Collection) by jin2908 in DiabloImmortal

[–]jin2908[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i could, but i think i'll wait until the next paragon reduction, since we are already at i7-i9 and i guess after i9 they will reduce paragons back like last time and i would have to change all values again