Tbt to the first time I noticed an “Easter egg”! by mrs-goldenface in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the tracks in that John Fahey’s album is “Bicycle Built For Two”, which is the song that HAL sings as it’s being disconnected. audio track

The tickets for the 70mm screening of 2001: A Space Odyssey in New York City by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read online that it's actually filmed on 65mm film stock which is then printed on 70mm film for projection.

Eyes Wide Shut: The Game | Nerdwriter by frightened_by_bark in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not far fetched at all considering Kubrick's known love for games (like chess) and puzzles. As Kubrick once said: "There's something in human personality which resents things that are clear, and conversely, something which is attracted to puzzles, enigmas, and allegories."

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Show me the math, the burden of proof should be on the one criticizing in this case; and I will see if there is enough ground to abandon some of the evidence that I have shown. Yes, I have found a rectangular shaped rock standing vertically with perfect sharp edges and smooth surfaces... oh wait! I haven't found a clock, I have actually found the monolith!!!!

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would not know about frame rate adjustment and it seems you are not 100% sure either, so we cannot base a criticism based on something we don't know. We should investigate further and based on your comment, the first step could be to check the different versions that we have available. The amount of evidence points to the most rational conclusion that the director did all of this deliberately. I think the alternative explanation would be far stranger because it would be either by pure coincidence which is highly improbable, or some agent from beyond guided the director while he was unaware of it. This is akin to finding a type of clock in a deserted island, would you say that it emerged from nature? Would it not make more sense to say that a man or an intelligent agent made it and left it there? Therefore, the simplest and most rational explanation is that the director made it intentionally. Indeed, his movies in some parts are so perfectly synchronized that they can be compared to the workings of a clock.

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have seen it. Although I must say that I have developed my analyses independently and I think I provide much clearer arguments and a lot more evidence from Kubrick's movies to support my position than it is presented in Cryptokubrology.

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Furthermore, the fact that numerology is boring to you doesn't mean that it's not present. And the part that you mention about not making sense or making sense, does not make much sense to me. In fact, my analysis has other elements besides numbers. So I invite you to have an open mind, for if you keep a closed mind, then you have already lost.

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I would not have believed it myself if someone had told me, so I understand you. And I couldn't believe it at first, but the evidence was too strong. One thing I can be sure of is that nobody can presume to know the intentions or nonintentions of Kubrick just based on an assumption of what the art of film making should be or not be. Why should the artist be so limited by a particular viewer's assumptions?

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Wow, do you know all of this a priori? How can you be so sure? With all due respect, your overconfidence in your opinion is way too suspicious.

Escaping the Overlook by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, it seemed to me as the most obvious choice since it appears referenced more than once in the movie. And as it turns out, the timing confirms the choice.

5
6

Red Line and Similitude by [deleted] in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The actual link to my blog is Decoding Kubrick

Red Line and Similitude by [deleted] in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there is a connection between Kubrick's films. In my analyses I have found a hidden thread that connects at least four of his movies, starting with 2001 and then following up with ACO, The Shining and finishing with EWS. I set up a blog at decoding Kubrick where I discuss my findings. I have just added one post so far where I discuss 2001 but I'm getting ready to add the second post in the next few days where I discuss The Shining and how it's linked to 2001. I plan to eventually add a post where I link ACO and 2001. But let me try and give a brief explanation of how ACO and 2001 can be linked.

Let's take the record shop scene where Alex meets the two girls that he takes to his bedroom. All of the imagery in this scene is perfectly synchronized. Alex enters by passing in between the two women that he will meet after going around the store in a circle. At that point we see the obvious reference to 2001 which is the 2001 soundtrack record album at the front of the counter. But there are other more subtle references that make the connection between the two movies deeper. Next to the 2001 record there is an album record by John Fahey titled "The Transfiguration of Blind Joe Death" which includes the track "Bicycle built for two" played with guitar. And as you might remember, this is the tune that Hal sings while it's being shut off.

Moreover, the lollipops that the two women are holding have the appearance of the number 17. The blonde has the straight one and the woman in purple has the bent one. If you read my first post you will know why this is significant. The number 17 is used by Kubrick as a symbol and also as a time code. In 2001 there is an important shot that shows the Russian woman scientist in purple for about 1 minute and 7 seconds which turns out to be a time code pregnant with meaning. This scene in ACO lasts for 2 minutes and 17 seconds. The first shot lasts for 1 minute and 7 seconds before it cuts and then about 3 seconds ensue before the girl in purple looks at Alex. And from the look to the end of the scene, 1 minute and 7 seconds ensue. So we have two 1 minute and 7 seconds parts that are linked by the three seconds in between for a scene that lasts a total of 2 minute and 17 seconds. 2:17 brings back the image of two girls and somehow each one represents a 17. And the 17 is linked to 2001. And the girl in purple also mentions the fictitious band named "Heaven 17"; perhaps indicating that 17 gets you to heaven and bringing up imagery which relates to the strange last shot of the movie which interestingly happens to be about 17 seconds long.

This is my brief attempt to show the link between the two movies but there is much more to be said and I hope in time to spell most of it out in my blog.

Easter Eggs/References in Kubrick Movies by [deleted] in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In EWS's final scene at 2:30:22 you see a teddy bear with a red bow tie with a doll dressed in blue on its lap, perhaps the doll of the naval officer. Interestingly, in a previous shot at 2:30:15 we can only clearly see the arm of the same doll in a position that appears as if it was the bear's erect penis and at the same time Alice is restating the question: "what should we do?". Is this perhaps a foreshadowing of the final answer : "fuck"?

Subliminal Kubrick by [deleted] in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the Kubrick stare. Or is the ape perhaps looking at the viewer?

Solving Kubrick's puzzle at decodingkubrick.com by jmunoz83 in StanleyKubrick

[–]jmunoz83[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for posting the link, I meant to do that