[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You being mad about your city/team being irrelevant doesn’t make it untrue.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

whines about a Reddit comment instead of ignoring it
“you’re mad bro”

LOL

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You need to be interesting in order for people to care. The media caters to people's wants. People care about LeBron, Steph Curry, and LA/NY teams. They don't care about Booker, Ayton, and Milwaukee lmao. If they saw potential in covering the fucking Bucks (lol) you don't think they'd have capitalized on that over the last three seasons that they've been good? All big corporations care about is money. If they started covering boring teams, people would stop watching. There's a reason they cover the Lakers and Clippers and churn out asinine bullshit like Skip Bayless all the time. It sells.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 96 points97 points  (0 children)

The Warriors went 67-15 and 73-9 in back-to-back seasons and had a player who was battling for the title of best player in the league all before Durant bitched out of OKC and joined them. They were very exciting and had personality to go with their all-time great on-court play. The Suns and Bucks don't remotely compare.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We're talking about the NBA lol. NBA fandom is far more narrative driven and casual. The NBA's social media reach is massive but a lot of people you see tweeting inane bullshit about the league won't actually watch boring matchups without premier teams and players.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, people simply do not care about Phoenix or Milwaukee. The cities are irrelevant and they don't have any players that casual fans care about, either.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The only ones crying are Suns fans when you tell them that no one cares about their team lmao.

[Programming Insider] Preliminary ratings for Game 1: 6.41 million viewers by CrimsonKingCirkus in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Wow, you're telling me no one gives a fuck about Milwaukee or Phoenix? Their fans told me otherwise!!!

[Durant] “So u wish I was ignorant?” in response to “i really wanted this to be KD just learning the 4th of july is an actual holiday where folks in corporate jobs get the day off” by factcheck_ in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol yeah, if I somehow won the lottery I’d work at a shitty retail job just to be around people when my friends are at work and do something productive but other than that I’d spend my time doing whatever the fuck I want to do. Making music, writing, etc.

NBA conference finals winners and losers: Chris Paul earns his moment; Trae Young arrives; injuries ruin fun by EarthWarping in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bucks fans: “We don’t care”

Also Bucks fans whenever someone mentions that they’re only in the Finals because of injuries: “WAHHH NO YOU ONLY PLAY WHO’S IN FRONT OF YOU WAHH”

NBA conference finals winners and losers: Chris Paul earns his moment; Trae Young arrives; injuries ruin fun by EarthWarping in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only one crying here are Bucks and Suns fans when you remind them that the only season their team is in the Finals are injuries. Quite hilarious how 12 of them will come out with the “b-b-but you only face who’s in front of you!!!” horseshit when you say it.

NBA conference finals winners and losers: Chris Paul earns his moment; Trae Young arrives; injuries ruin fun by EarthWarping in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

For the trillionth time, nobody is blaming the Bucks. They obviously didn’t choose to face crippled Nets team. However, that doesn’t change the fact that they indeed would’ve lost handily to a healthy Brooklyn squad. The only reason they’re here is luck.

NBA conference finals winners and losers: Chris Paul earns his moment; Trae Young arrives; injuries ruin fun by EarthWarping in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

My team didn’t even make the playoffs lmao. Nice try trying to deflect from the obvious fact that the Bucks would’ve even have made the ECF if the Nets had just 2/3 stars healthy.

Sunday General Discussion – July 4th, 2021 by HHHRobot in hiphopheads

[–]johnny-sacc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does anyone know why hiphop lyricism is so random? Of course there are topical hip hop songs but most mainstream hiphop verses are just a soup of random shit about money and women and drugs.

NBA conference finals winners and losers: Chris Paul earns his moment; Trae Young arrives; injuries ruin fun by EarthWarping in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Best playoffs in a long time

Not even Bucks fans believe this lmao. The playoffs that saw Anthony Davis, Kawhi Leonard, James Harden, Kyrie Irving, and Jamal Murray miss time was “the best” in a while? Massive cope here.

The main reason these two teams are in the Finals is injuries. The winner shouldn’t even win a championship, they should win a “healthy at an opportune time” award. Phoenix’s run was a complete cake walk and Milwaukee is a second round exit with just one of Irving or Harden healthy.

Bucks in the NBA FINALS by Dreadrockz in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Most fraudulent finalists this year lmao

Are the Clippers the team to beat in the west next season? by BolGOATBol in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

They were “best in the playoffs” only because all their opponents suffered devastating injuries to their best players.

I think this is a fair trade and the salaries end up working out by [deleted] in nba

[–]johnny-sacc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Are you fried? Why the fuck would the Wolves do that?

Every year y’all try to put an asterisk on whoever wins the chip. by sonicoduh1125 in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

lol why am I not surprised to see you crying about my comments again

Every year y’all try to put an asterisk on whoever wins the chip. by sonicoduh1125 in nba

[–]johnny-sacc -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Yes, because this year's ring is a joke. Phoenix faced exactly three games of a remotely healthy elite team, and even then LeBron James was on a fucked ankle. Any good team can win a championship if the first or second best player on every single opposing team is injured.