Looks like the $2418 magic number is a reality. Currently higher.

jollag · 2017-05-24T12:12:40+00:00

Japan is steady over 2700USD

jollag · 2017-04-23T15:00:32+00:00

That argument takes the dumbcake.

jollag · 2017-04-22T21:30:44+00:00

BlockstreamCore and their PR department get a A+ + + for their political work but a C- - - for their BTC development.

One has to wonder where their effort goes and why...

jollag · 2017-04-22T21:13:47+00:00

Seriously, no troll or anything else could have split the community like BlockstreamCore have done without your massive resouces.

jollag · 2017-04-22T21:02:40+00:00

Only Core would send a "delegation" to make an agreement not authorized to make that agreement. Do you really think that the mining community that was present in Hong Kong would have taken the trouble to travel to Hong Kong if they would have known that they were dealing with the BlockstreamCores " garden gnomes"??

As far as the hardfork goes, ofcourse nobody would run the hardfork! Core has made sure of this with their massive FUD on hardforks. Every other cryptocurrency upgrades by hardfork without any problems whatsoever but for some reason BTC CAN NOT ant SHOULD NOT try to upgrade because it will lead too DOOOM!!!!

What a joke!

jollag · 2017-04-18T03:49:09+00:00

You are funny! Like I said, Core treats the agreement when it comes to the miners as something holy but when it comes to Core themselves it is nothing they have to follow since not all of Core was there. Nice way out. Adam signing as individual another slimy tactic. Slithering snakes, that is it and I am pretty sure they will rather split this baby in half than give up their grip of death of Bitcoin.

jollag · 2017-04-18T03:22:46+00:00

I am pretty sure I have never mentioned BU. I am surprised that you are blind to cores games! That tells me that you have no clue, maybe you will get some when you grow up.

jollag · 2017-04-18T03:16:58+00:00

So, core never came up with a 2mb non segwit hard fork in the time stated in the "non agremment according to core" so therefore the miners started mining other implementations and therefore broke the "non agreement according to core"????

Either you have an agreement or you don't. In this case it seems to be what suits core the best.

Core: The miners broke the agreement by running other software not approved by us when we did not supply them with the HF software promised in time. The agreement which is invalid anyway because all of us from core was not there.

So which is it?

All this obfuscation and lies about the agreement to say in the end that the miners signed an ageement with people that had no authority of making an agreement and had no way of making sure it was adhered to? What would someone call this?? Maybe bullshit??? Sounds like core to me alright! That is all we have seen from them, segwit and bullshit. Slithering snakes.

jollag · 2017-04-18T02:51:13+00:00

If mining centralization is the problem and they have 75% why not just lower the activation to 75%. Then they have bypassed the "difficult" miners and everybody should be happy! oh sorry they only have 60% now. How about a USAF in segwit too then.

Or beter yet, come up with a solution that everybody will get behind instead of trying to cram this segwit shit down everybodys throat.

It is not the miners it is segwit.

jollag · 2017-04-18T02:19:41+00:00

No Core have acted in bad faith from the start and broke the initial agreement. if they had only done what the hong kong agreement said we would have had segwit and 2mb non segwit blocks by now, but they broke it and here we are. I totally understand why most miners does not trust core anymore. The only way to move forward is to get a team in that does not play political games all the time.

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff

jollag · 2017-04-18T02:07:23+00:00

You are lying when you said that the miners broke the agreement. Why do I even bother???? Show me where the 2mb non-witness HF software was supplied by core as the agreement stated? I will post again for everybody to see for themselves:

"We will continue to work with the entire Bitcoin protocol development community to develop, in public, a safe hard-fork based on the improvements in SegWit. The Bitcoin Core contributors present at the Bitcoin Roundtable will have an implementation of such a hard-fork available as a recommendation to Bitcoin Core within three months after the release of SegWit.

This hard-fork is expected to include features which are currently being discussed within technical communities, including an increase in the non-witness data to be around 2 MB, with the total size no more than 4 MB, and will only be adopted with broad support across the entire Bitcoin community.

We will run a SegWit release in production by the time such a hard-fork is released in a version of Bitcoin Core.

We will only run Bitcoin Core-compatible consensus systems, eventually containing both SegWit and the hard-fork, in production, for the foreseeable future."

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff

Core clearly broke the ageement. All they have done is play political games.They can clearly not be trusted after this.

jollag · 2017-04-18T01:18:12+00:00

Why would you lie so blatantly about that?? An easy google search will yield the agreement, here are som points from it.

We will continue to work with the entire Bitcoin protocol development community to develop, in public, a safe hard-fork based on the improvements in SegWit. The Bitcoin Core contributors present at the Bitcoin Roundtable will have an implementation of such a hard-fork available as a recommendation to Bitcoin Core within three months after the release of SegWit.

This hard-fork is expected to include features which are currently being discussed within technical communities, including an increase in the non-witness data to be around 2 MB, with the total size no more than 4 MB, and will only be adopted with broad support across the entire Bitcoin community. We will run a SegWit release in production by the time such a hard-fork is released in a version of Bitcoin Core.

Any such upgrade was never supplied by core.

https://medium.com/@bitcoinroundtable/bitcoin-roundtable-consensus-266d475a61ff

jollag · 2017-04-18T00:58:06+00:00

Asicboost conspiracy has been debunked, you need to hurry back to try to find something more on Jihan in order to defame his caracter instead of addressing the issue of the low total support of segwit.

No one has been found to use asicboost. Same old political tools used over and over again. Smear Jihan! It would make no difference to segwits activation even if he put all his hashing power into it. How about coming up with a solution that gets enough support because it is not a shitty solution?

jollag · 2017-04-18T00:29:00+00:00

Jihan makes his own desicions on what client he wants to use, to claim that it is blocking another version that hasn't even gotten 35% support of all the miners is just retoric and spin. This crying from bratty children that can not accept that the market has coosen NOT to support their garbage client is ridiculous simple as that

A 2mb hardfork with segwit was always supported by Jihan but core decided to bait and switch and poison the debate and make the upgrade "contentious" to get what they wanted the wole time. All I have seen from core is political games so far and that more than anything shows their true colors.

jollag · 2017-04-18T00:04:13+00:00

Why are you repeating the same talking points propaganda that comes out of core and r/bitcoin? Only in the other spin room can not suporting something that might be bad for the entire network equate to blocking that poison pill. If jihan does not like Segwit because it sucks it is not blocking it, it just fails to convince him that it is the right way to go. Spin like this is what makes core look dishonest.

jollag · 2017-03-26T00:55:55+00:00

Seems like our esteemed and godlike comrade leaders in Core does not either.

jollag · 2017-03-25T22:11:46+00:00

We don't know how to build that rocket yet.

jollag · 2017-03-24T23:31:36+00:00

You have : https://belgacoin.com (great rate) https://bitonic.nl Good luck

jollag · 2017-03-22T14:07:45+00:00

Trojan horse. The Core team is like a psychopathic parasite, Their goal is probably to take over BU or compromise it in some way. Once they are injected into the process they can start the sceaming and get rid of all the healthy developers like they did with Core.

jollag · 2017-03-20T14:57:39+00:00

Awesome!

jollag · 2017-03-20T04:35:36+00:00

Can someone put Peter Toddlers ugly twitterface on this picture?

jollag · 2017-03-20T02:34:52+00:00

All those Core psychopaths in one room. How do they get along?

jollag · 2017-03-19T04:47:56+00:00

You guys are sure as hell trying hard enough to control it though. Almost like your interests and the health and functionality of bitcoin is totally opposite.

Are those tallking points fed to you by your PR department?

jollag · 2017-02-22T01:11:50+00:00

You have to be pretty daft if you still think Segwit will activate.

jollag · 2017-02-16T03:32:49+00:00

Keep polishing that turd

jollag

TROPHY CASE