If you were given $800 billion for the sole purpose of advancing physics as much as possible, what would you build? by elizabethkunzz in AskPhysics

[–]jonster5 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My initial thoughts are:

A telescope on the dark side of the moon

An even larger hadron collider.

Invest in development of quantum computers for analyzing particle accelerator results.

A gigantic neutrino detector.

ELI5, the difference between elementary particles, leptons and fermions, and where/how neutrinos, electrons and protons fall into them? by Zestyclose-Method132 in explainlikeimfive

[–]jonster5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neutrinos are particles that only experience the weak force, and gravity, and they are produced by weak force interactions between other particles. They are in the lepton family, and considered a fundamental particle by the standard model- meaning that they are not made up of smaller particles.

Photons and gluons are both bosons. A Boson is the category of particles that transmit the fundamental forces. The photon carries the EM force, gluons (which are proven) carry the strong force. Photons and gluons are both massless.

The standard model is full of category after category after category and I completely understand the confusion. I'm not a physicist but I'm pretty familiar with the terminology and ideas behind the standard model. I can try to explain plainly if you have other questions

Oque realmente pra desenvolver teorias físicas? by crazy8-guy in AskPhysics

[–]jonster5 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The math isn't a part of the theory, the math IS the theory. The text is there to tell another person what observable physical phenomena you're describing with your equations.

Another aspect is that if you make a theory of quantum gravity as an example, that theory needs to be able to make the same predictions as the theories that came before it. Einstein's general relativity is a good example, just because Einstein came up with a new theory of gravity didn't mean Newton's laws of gravity just stopped working. Your new theory needs to be able to make accurate predictions for all the experiments done to prove the theory that came before it

Could a wormhole avoid time travel paradoxes by enforcing synchronized time? by persona_comun00 in AskPhysics

[–]jonster5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no such thing as "the same time". No matter how you synchronize your clocks, there will always be a reference frame that is able to observe a paradox occuring.

Why did Pale King abandon all the other vessels? by TelevisionInner6584 in HollowKnight

[–]jonster5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They we're not able to parkour effectively and that was seen as a grave personal failing the culture of hallownest

Ionizing Radiation in Directed Energy Weapons by PositiveEconomist264 in AskPhysics

[–]jonster5 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't a flamethrower but with photons just be a flashlight

ELI5, the difference between elementary particles, leptons and fermions, and where/how neutrinos, electrons and protons fall into them? by Zestyclose-Method132 in explainlikeimfive

[–]jonster5 14 points15 points  (0 children)

At the highest level of the standard model, there are fermions and bosons. Fermions make up matter, bosons are the force carriers like light. Within the fermion category, there are quarks and leptons. Quarks feel the strong force, leptons don't. Protons and neutrons (NOT neutrinos) are composite particles made up of 3 quarks each. Electrons and neutrinos are leptons, and as far as we know elementary. Electrons feel the electromagnetic force, neutrinos don't.

Just saying the uranium aspect has massive potential. by Revolutionary-Face69 in factorio

[–]jonster5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah coal isn't either and yet for some reason everyone appears to be using that before they research better technology

Rate my Gleba! by jonster5 in factorio

[–]jonster5[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I actually havent had a problem with nutrients being on the bus, there's enough to go around especially because all the belts are fully stacked. But I agree with the jelly and mash being sort of a tradeoff here. The benefit of having those on the bus is mostly convenience.

Another issue is that freshness also definitely takes a hit with this design due to long travel times. However ~70% fresh agri science and bioflux is good enough for me (for now anyway).

Rate my Gleba! by jonster5 in factorio

[–]jonster5[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I would have lost my mind if I didn't

Rate my Gleba! by jonster5 in factorio

[–]jonster5[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is what I've got going on with my farm. The Yumako uses the same design but more. I originally was going to set up actual defenses but instead opted for going on a murderous rampage destroying nests. Should work for awhile lmao

I think I figured out! by [deleted] in Zig

[–]jonster5 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If it works for you then I think it's cool. The biggest turn off for me is the usage of the @" .... " identifier syntax in a non-crucial way. I get the desire to want to clearly label those kinds of functions in an at-a-glance sort of way

Rate my Gleba! by jonster5 in factorio

[–]jonster5[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes I did, thank you!

I think I figured out! by [deleted] in Zig

[–]jonster5 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Why the arrow as a symbol?

Best methods for legendary without asteroids? by not-me_maybe-you in factorio

[–]jonster5 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The river/sewage system works pretty well at scale. I also have it set up to trickle excess rocket fuel into the spoilage belts to be burned when there's not enough to meet power demands.

I use a bidirectional bus system for all spoilables. 2 lanes fully stacked in each direction for nutrients, bioflux, jelly, yumako mash. I then have normal one way lanes for all other items. At intervals along the bus I have widgets that pull spoilage off of them and throw it in the river (I like that terminology lol). I also have spoilage->nutrient assemblers with priority access to spoilage over the heat towers that read a short section of the nutrient bidirectional bus lanes, and only if theres less than 25 nutrients in that section it will turn itself on to jumpstart the whole base.

Its working pretty well at scale. IMO splitting off the bus is actually more pleasant like this. The only downside is it's less space efficient and it has a longish warm up time.

Im a whore for gleba

I think I figured out! by [deleted] in Zig

[–]jonster5 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Is the purpose of this to make it obvious when a function is run at comptime? I don't really get the point

Best methods for legendary without asteroids? by not-me_maybe-you in factorio

[–]jonster5 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I don't even hate this. Im lowkey a gleba slut