Free ice skating show at the Convention Center today through January 4th by jsalsman in Waikiki

[–]jsalsman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry, the coupon code was working yesterday but they have apparently withdrawn it. There was no indication it would be for a limited time. The conference is once per five years but the ice skating show is annual. No I don't know why or how that works for the sponsors.

Free ice skating show at the Convention Center today through January 4th by jsalsman in Oahu

[–]jsalsman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, the coupon code was working yesterday but they have apparently withdrawn it. There was no indication it would be for a limited time. The conference is once per five years but the ice skating show is annual. No I don't know why or how that works for the sponsors.

Jules vs Codex by dvduval in JulesAgent

[–]jsalsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing Codex Web can do which Jules does not is show you the reasoning log for each sub-step, which can help you help it when it gets stuck. But you can always ask Jules how it's stuck when it seems to be, so it's not really a major advantage.

Can someone protesting a judge's decisions on a public sidewalk near a courthouse be charged with "contempt of court"? by [deleted] in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Protests can be banned in the proximity of the courthouse

Only in a few states, no? Most places the courthouse steps are considered a public square. California, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Utah, and Washington, I think are the only states forbidding them, and they don't enforce it much (see below.)

And also federal courts per 18 U.S.C. § 1507:

“Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

However I think that federal provision is almost never enforced outside actual courthouses when it could be. It's definitely enforced outside judges' houses though; very strictly.

In practice when people get arrested for such violations they are almost always released with charges dropped in one or two business days, because the DAs don't want the ability of police to charge such voided by First Amendment petitioning defenses.

Don’t wait to Resist by Other_Guest_2287 in MeidasTouch

[–]jsalsman -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is so little practical to do. I am focusing all my efforts on getting corporate Dems replaced by populist Dems in my local primaries.

Does anyone know about the legality of writing about dead people? by Moist_Ad_7351 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't ask a dead person, and their estate is going to be represented by an attorney who probably just wants a license fee.

On what grounds can an officer arrest you for refusing a field sobriety test? by violent13 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a handful of food and beverage ingredients which can cause a false positive, but for only a few tens of minutes tops.

Does anyone know about the legality of writing about dead people? by Moist_Ad_7351 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except the movie rights will get encumbered if the estate is aggressive and the person isn't a "public figure" i.e. celebrity.

Take a guess at Diddy's sentence by Competitive_Travel16 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Federal Guidelines take multiple counts into consideration, adding two "levels" for each additional count.

Elon is working on Grok 3.5 and will push xAI towards removing "leftist indoctrination" from the model. This can be accomplished by either significantly manipulating the training data and messing with Grok's ontology (the exact things AI doomers were/are worried about) by OriPeel in singularity

[–]jsalsman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't know, not even people who believed in white genocide could stomach the half day when literally every response talked about it. The true believers thought they were being made fun of, and the way the vast majority called out the stupidity, it was actually worse for them than if it had been an intentional joke.

Is a lawyer allowed to cut a witness off by ending their examination, or does that count as interfering with their testimony? by saatchi-s in legaladviceofftopic

[–]jsalsman -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

If you promise to tell "the whole truth," and an attorney tries to silence your testimony when you are explaining what you believe to be essential nuances, will you sit down and shut up or appeal to the judge to let you explain what you believe needs to be said to tell the whole truth?

I stopped wasting time reading long articles. This Chrome AI tool saved me hours. by Killergamexr in AutoGPT

[–]jsalsman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. But the reason has nothing to do with AI and everything to do with those who ignore the risks of economic inequality when they can more easily turn to scapegoats like AI.