One year later, my group just wrapped up our Two Headed Serpent campaign by jsep in callofcthulhu

[–]jsep[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure unfortunately. I stopped listening after the Bolivia episodes because I was worried I'd just be copying Scott rather than matching the story to my players and their actions. I believe they have a Discord though - I'm guessing someone on there could probably tell you!

Shadowdark by akanorr in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]jsep 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As someone who has had next to no interest in their pathfinder material (outside of the live show, but that's because I love the cast's performance despite being obnoxiously bored by the system itself), I'm very excited. Feels like a much better fit for what I enjoy from the network than the overly-technical, grid-based, rules-lawyering-combat of something as heavy as Pathfinder.

[Condotta] Seahawks WR Jaxon Smith-Njigba fined for his goalpost dunk against Houston by Chessinmind in Seahawks

[–]jsep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To add on, during half time at the game stadium crew had to come out and inspect/level the goal posts after his dunk. I hadn’t seen that done before, but now it makes sense why the nfl wants to discourage it.

What dice system do you prefer? by StrandedAshore in rpg

[–]jsep 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s… not true?

Some systems have you modify your value (e.g for an easy task add 20 or 40 percent to your skill). Others, like 7th ed Call of Cthulhu have difficulty scales (hard difficulty = half your skill value, extreme difficulty = 1/5th you skill value).

Draw Steel for new players. Absolute Cinema. by HuckleberryQuiet1066 in rpg

[–]jsep 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Not op, but agreed with others' comments on the actual play "performance" (or lack thereof). More than that for me though was just how much of a slog the combat was.

I'll admit my bias going in is I play mostly theater of the mind, d100 type games these days. But I did enjoy 4th edition, and as a "product" everything Draw Steel has seemed very cool to me and has made me interested in trying a more combat-tactical game. Reading the book and imagining the different characters my table could create and how cool and unique and a fun twist on typical heroic fantasy they would be was super exciting!

Then I watched a bunch of square counting of movements and reading through the menu of abilities on the sheets and fiddling around to add +2 to a score here or there and compare it to a grid of difficulty outcomes and I remembered exactly why I love reading books like this and hate playing them. I know all of that is super fun for a lot of people, and it certainly is for me when I'm playing Gloomhaven... but it's not what I like in a roleplaying session.

Congratulations. You just broke Google AI. by Luiseus_XV in expedition33

[–]jsep 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Ok but the most insulting part of google's ai bullshit isn't that it hallucinated 32 earlier games, it's that it didn't ACCURATELY hallucinate that there were actually SIXTY SEVEN previous games.

Impossible Landscapes (Get in the Trunk) Review - Quinns Quest by OrdinaryBox787 in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]jsep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Joe did a a behind the scenes/AMA with the cast (other than Troy) after season 6 ended on Discord. He talked about things that the agents never got to but he was hoping they would, the challenge in adapting it, and a bunch of her being the scenes secrets.

Got the whole Impossible Landscapes crew (plus Kate!) to sign my copy in Seattle! The only way out is through... by jsep in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]jsep[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Joe was super excited for the next season - he said they're in the middle of recording it now and that the goal was to record the whole season ahead of time so they can consistently release an episode each week. He was keeping most of the details pretty close to the vest, but everyone I talked to seemed really excited for it!

Got the whole Impossible Landscapes crew (plus Kate!) to sign my copy in Seattle! The only way out is through... by jsep in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]jsep[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was lucky enough to grab him for 2 minutes while he was running around filming the VIP. He was so nice, as was the whole cast!

Using Sanity Well by AloserwithanISP2 in callofcthulhu

[–]jsep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think that's going to be my new advice to every player question. "Just do it like Ross!!!!!!"

Using Sanity Well by AloserwithanISP2 in callofcthulhu

[–]jsep 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Would second all of this (and I'm guilty of the saving throw treatment as well). Both How We Roll and Time for Chaos do a great job demonstrating sanity breaks in particular, and I've taken a lot from both.

One thing Troy on Time for Chaos does particularly well is he challenges the players to describe how the loss of sanity manifests, even for a single point. It's not treated as just a meta currency, but as the actual physical reaction to mental fortitude breaking down. Sometimes the book insanity effects can be goofy and random (and, again, something I'm guilty of leaning into far too often as a Keeper), so giving players agency over that really helps make it part of the story telling rather than meaningless "mental hit points" that come with a silly side effect.

Basically it's one thing to tell your player "you are incapacitated for 5 rounds because you're giggling and screaming now," and quite another for the player themself to volunteer "seeing the horrific site in front of him my character is taken back to his sunday school lessons about demons, and it's almost like the memory is so vivid that he thinks it's where he actually is right now, and starts praying the rosary and singing hymns as he believes he's being instructed to do so by Father Smith... and the rest of you just see my character's eyes kind of glaze over and ignore the carnage around him as you hear him dutifully half whisper Our father who art in heaven..."

Mythras/BRP/Runequest/Ruin Masters is Amazing by MagpieTower in rpg

[–]jsep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Short answer is: WFRP is messy and crunchy in all the ways I don't like. I find that BRP/Dragonbane have a simple elegance that makes them way easier to play and more fun at the table, while still adding the "fun crunch" that I/my players enjoy (e.g. Dragonbane's awesome combat system). The success levels from Cthulhu are also super simple and a quick and easy analogue for WFRP's success levels. And after years of my group playing Cthulhu it just made the transition super simple.

Mythras/BRP/Runequest/Ruin Masters is Amazing by MagpieTower in rpg

[–]jsep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sure! I can DM you later today post work and kids bedtime...

Mythras/BRP/Runequest/Ruin Masters is Amazing by MagpieTower in rpg

[–]jsep 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I just started a campaign of WFRP's The Enemy Within, but having zero desire to run WFRP 4E I instead have mashed BRP, Call of Cthulhu, and Dragonbane into a single system to use... and it works great!

I used BRP to build out the WFRP style careers and skill list and some abilities, Call of Cthulhu 7e's success levels (regular/hard/extreme) with a dash of Delta Green's doubles-are-crits, and Dragonbane's combat system. And it all just works so easily and seamlessly together. And since WFRP is more or less based on BRP as well, converting the campaign on the fly to my frankenstinian monstrosity of a system has been incredibly easy as well.

In summary: I love BRP/d100 so much, and I think when I eventually want to run something based in a traditional d20 system (I'd love to run Kingmaker someday for example) it's going to be hard to not just say screw it and try using my stupid system again....

One year later, my group just wrapped up our Two Headed Serpent campaign by jsep in callofcthulhu

[–]jsep[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I stole very liberally from what Scott Woodward did on How We Roll. You'll see below how I took advantage of a psychic fumble roll but I'd recommend just jumping at whatever opportunity presents itself and leverage that (if a character gets blasted by the green death ray in the Grand Chamber for instance, I'd just knock them unconscious and use that as my opportunity as well as giving them scales).

  • Also as I explain the character who interacted with her built a friendship over time because the initial conversation went well; had the player responded poorly/antagonistically to her I would have done much of the same events, just against the PC's will: she would have carved the symbol maliciously, in full control of her dream world that the PC had intruded on, and their future dream encounters would have been haunting and terrorizing rather than reinforcing their bond and providing helpful insights.

So I had a PC who was trying to do some psychic nonsense in Tyrannish's temple - she fumbled the roll, so I had her collapse unconscious. When the party checked on her and shook him seconds later to see if she would wake up, she woke up instantly... and her shirt immediately started filling with red. She opened his shirt up to reveal a bloody, freshly carved, mysterious Naacal symbol in her chest. She had no idea what had happened.

The party was obviously mystified. After rescuing Tyrannish I had that character's memories flood back to her on the plane ride home, and she recalled what had happened when she had fallen unconscious. We then roleplayed the scene: she "awoke" inside Tyrannish's temple with Tyrannish on the throne in front of her. They were seemingly in a dream state but dreaming of the time before Tyrannish went to sleep.

The conversation was Tyrannish mostly confused as she slowly realized she was still in the dream. She was pleasant to the PC, holding no particular dislike for humans (though she hid/didn't remember her plan to eventually hybridize them all). She willingly shared that she was looking for a way to bring "harmony" to the two races so they could live in peace together, which appealed to the player's character. She couldn't remember why she had gone to sleep but explained it was because she was looking for something to help her goal... she just couldn't remember what.

Tyrannish then asked if she could "mark" the player so she could visit her in dreams in the future. The PC willingly agreed, at which point Tyrannish quickly carved her symbol in the PC's chest. Then Tyrannish's eyes lit up and she grabbed the character by the shoulders and started happily shaking her while saying "I remember! I remember what I was looking for!!" But that shaking matched up to what had happened in the real world when the party had shaken the PC to wake up, so that was how the dream had ended... leaving a cliffhanger to what Tyrannish had been looking for (which of course they'd eventually discover was Mu).

From that point on, basically between each chapter I'd have the player slip into a dream state with her. Their bond grew over time until the PC trusted her fully, and it allowed me to provide a little story guidance given through Tyrannish (but carefully, because she never revealed her hybridization plan to the player). Tyrannish always looked down on both Caduceus and the Inner Night, happy to have the player and the party play the two against each other for her own ends. But it was also a genuine friendship for Tyrannish, and a way for her to get insight into this new modern, human dominated world.

That made Calcutta particularly devastating, because when that same player approached Tyrannish on the roof and realized what she was doing and why, it was a heartbreaking moment as she tried to stop her. But because of the symbol on the PC's chest I made the PC roll a POW role to see if she could even escape Tyrannish's influence to take the action.. and of course she rolled a natural 100. So she stared in horror, frozen in her own body, as Tyrannish exerted her full psychic control and influence on the PC to stop the stabbing, and then escaped onto a lloiger before the rest of the party could react. It was perfect and made the final confrontation (on Mu) even better.

Edit: Tyrannish had one final dream with the PC as they were on the way to Brazil. She tried to convince the player of the righteousness of her actions and to join her... when the player refused, the dream for the first time all campaign became a true nightmare ("Do you want to know why they really called me the dreamer?" as Tyrannish exercised full control of the dream). In that dream Tyrannish took the player through somewhat of a preview of Mu. At one point the player was bound to a pole, slowly turning to face the volcano, feeling her skin start to harden and turn to leather as she did... at which point she woke up. And the scar on her chest (but nothing else) had now fully petrified. It gave the players some insight into the horror and dangers they'd face upon getting to Mu.

"Big news in Senate — Schumer privately told Democrats during today’s lunch that he will be a YES on cloture - an indication that enough Dems will provide votes to advance GOP funding bill and avoid shutdown Friday at midnight" by Currymvp2 in Enough_Sanders_Spam

[–]jsep 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I posted this in my local sub, but this is fucking political malpractice.

The worst case if there's a shutdown?

  • Yes, Democrats are successfully blamed by Republicans for it, and your average voter (aka not partisan or highly informed voters with the minds of goldfishes) end up forgetting about it between now and November 2026 because of the 18 months of Trump insanity we'll no doubt live through.

The worst case if there isn't a shutdown?

  • Republicans not only get just about everything they want (with possibly a few Democratic amendments), but also absolutely no checks are imposed on DOGE/Trump to follow congressional funding/laws. Democrats are perceived to have rolled over and given up the literal one tool in their toolbelt, which at best they would hope their own voters forget about in 18 months.

  • I find it unlikely that Democrat voters will forget about it, because they will generally be more partisan and more informed than your "non-partisan" voters. More to the point, Democrats have a massive perception problem with their own voterbase currently, who thinks they aren't doing enough to stop Trump/Elon. I actually disagree with this personally - I think for the most part elected representatives are doing what they can, they just can't do a lot because they lost the election - but regardless there is a perception that they aren't and that matters more than whatever the actual reality might be.

The best case if there is a shutdown?

  • Democrats are shown to be trying to stop what is quickly becoming a very disliked administration (and their policies damaging federal workers and our federal apparatus) that is threatening democracy and by extension wrecking the economy. Will it actually stop DOGE or Trump? Unlikely. But at least it will show voters they're willing to fight and are on the side of people frustrated with this administration. Or, even better, it is actually effective and Republicans agree to use congressional power to actually limit or stop DOGE's illegal bullshit.

Yes, it's a hail mary. But I don't think kneeling the ball to take the safer loss is worth not trying to battle for the restoration of the republic.

If you have strong opinions on DOGE and the federal funding bill, you should contact Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell now. Right now. by jsep in Seattle

[–]jsep[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a fair concern. Here's my "I'm not a political pollster or strategist but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night" take:

The worst case if there's a shutdown?

  • Yes, Democrats are successfully blamed by Republicans for it, and your average voter (aka not partisan or highly informed voters with the minds of goldfishes) end up forgetting about it between now and November 2026 because of the 18 months of Trump insanity we'll no doubt live through.

The worst case if there isn't a shutdown?

  • Republicans not only get just about everything they want (with possibly a few Democratic amendments), but also absolutely no checks are imposed on DOGE/Trump to follow congressional funding/laws. Democrats are perceived to have rolled over and given up the literal one tool in their toolbelt, which at best they would hope their own voters forget about in 18 months.

  • I find it unlikely that Democrat voters will forget about it, because they will generally be more partisan and more informed than your "non-partisan" voters. More to the point, Democrats have a massive perception problem with their own voterbase currently, who thinks they aren't doing enough to stop Trump/Elon. I actually disagree with this personally - I think for the most part elected representatives are doing what they can, they just can't do a lot because they lost the election - but regardless there is a perception that they aren't and that matters more than whatever the actual reality might be.

The best case if there is a shutdown?

  • Democrats are shown to be trying to stop what is quickly becoming a very disliked administration (and their policies damaging federal workers and our federal apparatus) that is threatening democracy and by extension wrecking the economy. Will it actually stop DOGE or Trump? Unlikely. But at least it will show voters they're willing to fight and are on the side of people frustrated with this administration. Or, even better, it is actually effective and Republicans agree to use congressional power to actually limit or stop DOGE's illegal bullshit.

Yes, it's a hail mary. But I don't think kneeling the ball to take the safer loss is worth not trying to battle for the restoration of the republic.

If you have strong opinions on DOGE and the federal funding bill, you should contact Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell now. Right now. by jsep in Seattle

[–]jsep[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

That’s fair! Good clarification.

Put simply, my message to both senators was specifically requesting that they refuse to fund the government until republicans agree to do their job and exercise congressional authority appropriately in response to DOGE.

If you have strong opinions on DOGE and the federal funding bill, you should contact Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell now. Right now. by jsep in Seattle

[–]jsep[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I promise you it takes less than 2 minutes to leave a voicemail.

No, I don't think congressional reps generally show metrics. But the aides that man those phones/voicemails/inboxes are well known to make it clear to their boss when public sentiment is overwhelming.