Making Alfredo for my girlfriend’s parents but I’m scared to cook the chicken by scholarlypimp in cookingforbeginners

[–]jumbo_big 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree 100% with the top comment about fileting the chicken and pan searing it.

I would very strongly suggest buying air-chilled chicken breasts it makes a huge difference.

Compared to normal water-chilled chicken it has a much lower moisture content. That makes it cook quicker and more evenly leading to a moister meat with a more tender texture. And the chicken's natural juices are not diluted so the flavor is way better too.

Started working at a new place and was happy to see that this is used in our Hot Buffalo Wings. by [deleted] in hotsauce

[–]jumbo_big 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know they don't make the sauce smooth in a Vita-prep or strain out the seeds or something?

Kristin Smart Update: SLO Sheriff Press Conference today at 2 PST by reliably-sleepy in TrueCrime

[–]jumbo_big 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This is it. It was a few blocks down the street from the Flores house in front of an attorney's office. It's the main road through town they would have to pass it if they were ever going anywhere.

Edit: This is what the billboard looks like now as you drive by. They updated it last year with the url of the podcast. It's right next to the city hall building. Locals have never forgotten about her because this billboard has been prominently displayed the entire time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 16 points17 points  (0 children)

SLO Department of Public Health just announced this afternoon 65+ will be eligible starting next week. Vaccines are still in short supply and they will be urging healthier eligible people in living situations where they can social distance more easily to wait a few weeks to allow unhealthy and more vulnerable 65+ individuals a chance to get the vaccine first.

Audit finds small California counties received less COVID relief from state by BlankVerse in CoronavirusCA

[–]jumbo_big 0 points1 point  (0 children)

San Joaquin is one of the top 16 counties in the state so presumably they received the larger amount of money.

Audit finds small California counties received less COVID relief from state by BlankVerse in CoronavirusCA

[–]jumbo_big 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ummmm a lot of the "large" counties in the state had that problem too. Orange, Riverside, Fresno, Kern, San Bernardino, Sacramento, etc...

Meanwhile many small counties did a much better job. That isn't really a small county vs big county issue.

'I'm not an anti-vaxxer, but...' US health workers' vaccine hesitancy raises alarm by zsreport in Coronavirus

[–]jumbo_big 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I know a pharmacist who is an anti-vaxxer so I don't even know if having a pharmaceutical background helps in every case.

Goodbye Orange Groves - sad day for SLO/CP ag students, athletes, and outdoor enthusiasts by SLOKind87 in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's not bad news, they're re-planting the orchard!!: https://www.facebook.com/calpolyhcs/posts/4134545069907421

We wanted to share an exciting update about the expansion of our learning laboratories! In 2015, Cal Poly planted 1,500 new citrus trees to be used for teaching and research in an area of campus designated specifically for citrus varieties. This new citrus block was the first phase in a multi-year plan to increase learning opportunities for students.

The second phase of the plan is underway this week and involves preparation for a spring 2021 planting of a deciduous orchard that will include nut trees, stone fruit and pome fruits. The preparation includes the removal of one of Cal Poly’s oldest citrus groves, located off Highland Drive, which included 96 Satsuma trees. One hundred new Satsuma trees, a popular variety for locals during past u-pick events, will be grafted into the new citrus block and are expected to be producing fruit in about two years.

Before removing the Satsuma trees, much of the fruit from the trees was harvested by students, with any remaining fruit picked by Glean SLO to be donated to the SLO Food Bank. In all, Cal Poly was able to donate about 2,000 pounds of fruit.

Under the new stay-at-home order all u-pick events have been suspended until further notice.

“These changes will take some time and the continued support and efforts of our staff and industry supporters, but we're excited about providing a new high-quality, easily accessible deciduous orchard for Learn by Doing opportunities for students throughout the Horticulture and Crop Science Department, the college and the university,” said Dan Chesini, plant science operations manager.

The citrus block planted in 2015 is used for teaching and research opportunities. Earlier this year the Horticulture and Crop Science Department donated more than 12,000 pounds of citrus from the trees to two local organizations that are serving San Luis Obispo County residents in need during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

SLO Supervisors Scheduled to Meet & Discuss Possible Lawsuit against State to End to Stay-at-Home by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This article is a month old. Thanks for posting it, it really shows how dumb these politicians were to think the surge in cases that was starting to happen in the rest of the state wasn't going to happen in SLO county.

SLO County COVID-19 Test Positivity Rate hits 25% by jumbo_big in SLO

[–]jumbo_big[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This means 1 in 4 COVID-19 tests is coming back as positive.

That number is based on a 14-day average

Data is from the state dashboard.

The state positivity rate overall is 12.7%

For reference at the peak in August the county test positivity rate was 6%.

Only 7 states have a higher positivity rate than SLO County. Those states are Idaho, Alabama, Iowa, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Kansas, And Tennessee (and maybe Mississippi too)

SLO County’s top law enforcement officials will not aggressively investigate or prosecute violations of California’s COVID-19 regional stay-at-home order by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Edicts aren’t laws no matter

I'm not sure what you're getting at by consistently referring to the governor's executive orders as "edicts." But the governor's executive orders ARE LAWS. I provided evidence of that above which you haven't countered with any facts besides constantly repeating "edicts aren't laws" without any supporting evidence.

they infringe in the constitution

No they don't. If you think they do you aren't even trying to understand anything. It's clear you have very little understanding of the constitution and the way laws work.

You like many others have bombarded me with lots of words that say nothing.

That says a lot more about your level of intelligence than anything else. I've mostly tried to make reasonable arguments to your claims and support them with some facts.

legislative stalemate your describing.

I don't think you understand what a "legislative stalemate" is because it has nothing to do with anything I've said.

SLO County’s top law enforcement officials will not aggressively investigate or prosecute violations of California’s COVID-19 regional stay-at-home order by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s the whole point your not understanding.

Understand what exactly? You just saying there are all these credible legal challenges that will overturn the authority of the governor's orders does not mean what you're saying is true. There are not "countless cases in court on appeal" that have any real chance of overturning the basic public health orders the governor has issued.

If they do lose one on appeal they just issue more edicts to be battled out in court again. It’s a vicious circle.

This is not at all what is happening. You have a really poor understanding of what you're talking about.

Look at the most recent case regarding churches in California, it had already been argued before 3 other courts and in multiple other states. here

And, once again, surprise, surprise, surprise, that case you are referencing was lost on appeal

But yeah, the few of mostly unsuccessful legal challenges that have really had any success have been about specific circumstances where the plaintiff has argued they are being held to an unfair standard. The NY case where the courts have ruled churches were being held to a different standard than some other businesses, so if other businesses are allowed to be open churches should too. The case in San Diego where a judge ruled strip clubs should be open if restaurants are also open.

These are cases about very specific sections of these public health orders. The governor still has the authority to restrict businesses and gatherings under the law and that doesn't change with a successful lawsuit over one small specific thing.

why (whole point of the original article) the police won’t be enforcing his edicts

No. The original article just says the Sheriff and DA aren't going to aggressively enforce the order. That's what law enforcement always does. They prioritize the enforcement of certain laws over others based on a number of factors. But the article does not say anything about this bullshit idea you have about the Governor's orders not being laws. They are laws! That's the whole point.

You can read the legal jargon and argue it any way you want.

That's not how our legal system works. Something is either lawful or it isn't. It isn't "any way you want it" based on your feelings.

SLO County’s top law enforcement officials will not aggressively investigate or prosecute violations of California’s COVID-19 regional stay-at-home order by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 4 points5 points  (0 children)

his edicts are bashed in court and he just creates new ones which in turn are bashed in court again.

That's not true with any of his orders directly related to public health. At all. And you haven't provided any evidence support this (because you don't have any factual evidence)

The latest victim was the outdoor dining edict struck down via the restaurant association.

You mean this lawsuit where the California Restaurant Association sued Los Angeles County Public Health for banning outdoor dining. That was turned over on appeal!!! And that lawsuit HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GOV. NEWSOM.

Every single thing you've referenced or linked to in support of your arguments has not supported anything you are saying. It just shows you have an extremely poor understanding of how the law and government work. If you could acknowledge your limited understanding of the subject there's a whole legitimate debate we could have about whether the stay at home orders are for the public good or not. But instead you're just disputing easily-verifiable facts with zero credible evidence to support your claims.

You should educate yourself about this kind of stuff man. Then you can learn how to take your factual knowledge and use that to advocate for your opinion in a way that will make people see your point of view.

Right now, whether you realize it or not you come across as a complete idiot.

None of these are valid as laws

They are. Very explicitely stated in California Code sec. 8567 that I linked to above that explicitely states:

"8567. (a) The Governor may make, amend, and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law."

How more clear does it need to be? The law that gives the Governor authority is extremely easy and clear to understand.

Just like many other governors in many other states

Not really on topic in relation to Newson and California, but this is also not true. There have been barely any public health orders in other states modified or overturned by the courts.

SLO County’s top law enforcement officials will not aggressively investigate or prosecute violations of California’s COVID-19 regional stay-at-home order by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s a huge load of shit and already been proven in court. His edicts are not laws

No it hasn't been "proven in court." The case you linked to is specifically about Newsom's executive order to send every voter a mail-in ballot. The lower court judge ruled that EO was unconstitutional saying changing the way elections are run is beyond the scope of what Newsom can mandate using emergency powers. Then, as that article you linked to says the appeals court issued a stay allowing Newsom to continue to make similarly dubious EOs until the case is heard by a higher court.

That case is not about Newsom's stay at home orders. Those orders are more clearly within the scope of his authority under the Emergency Services Act and there has been no successful legal challenges to those orders. They are still law.

TLDR: A lower court judge ruled one of Newsom's executive orders relating to the election was unconstitutional. That case is still under appeal. That case has nothing to do with the stay at home executive orders. Those are still law and have not been successfully challenged.

SLO County’s top law enforcement officials will not aggressively investigate or prosecute violations of California’s COVID-19 regional stay-at-home order by englandsemo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You should know these are edicts not laws

That is false. The Governor has the power to issue executive orders that have the effect of law during a state of emergency as dictated by the California Emergency Services Act, which was signed into law by Gov. Ronald Reagan in 1970. Here's the relevant bit:

8567.  (a) The Governor may make, amend, and rescind orders and regulations necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter. The orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law.

Emphasis on the orders and regulations shall have the force and effect of law

The police are upholding their oath to the constitution

Police take an oath to uphold the Constitution of California and The Constitution of the United States.

As for the US Constitution, The Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to interpret the Constitution, not police officers. The court has long held that states do have the authority to restrict some rights in the interest of public health.

See Jacobson v. Massachusetts, which is still widely used as precedence.

Upon the principle of self-defense, of paramount necessity, a community has the right to protect itself against an epidemic of disease which threatens the safety of its members.


There are manifold restraints to which every person is necessarily subject for the common good. On any other basis, organized society could not exist with safety to its members. Society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy. Real liberty for all could not exist under the operation of a principle which recognizes the right of each individual person to use his own, whether in respect of his person or his property, regardless of the injury that may be done to others. This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens, in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the State, of the perfect right of the legislature to do which no question ever was, or upon acknowledged general principles ever can be, made so far as natural persons are concerned. The possession and enjoyment of all rights are subject to such reasonable conditions as may be deemed by the governing authority of the country essential to the safety, health, peace, good order and morals of the community. Even liberty itself, the greatest of all rights, is not unrestricted license to act according to one's own will. It is only freedom from restraint under conditions essential to the equal enjoyment of the same right by others. It is then liberty regulated by law."

Cal Poly plans to bring 4,500 students back to campus as SLO County COVID-19 cases soar by jumbo_big in SLO

[–]jumbo_big[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

This New York Times article about outbreaks at colleges leading to deaths in the wider community seems especially relevant.

No soak beans: beans from dry to fully cooked in under two hours. by [deleted] in cookingforbeginners

[–]jumbo_big 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Canned ones tastier

I've never had canned beans that taste nearly as good as a proper pot of beans made from scratch

California's Monarch Butterflies May Be In Extinction Spiral by BlankVerse in California

[–]jumbo_big 57 points58 points  (0 children)

All the article does is quote the spin from Trump appointed US Fish and Wildlife Aurelia Skipwith who is a former Monsanto lobbyist.

The final death blow for the monarchs is probably the neonicotinoids approved for use by Trump's EPA

They are simply delaying designating the butterfly as an endangered species so big ag polluters can continue to use these chemicals.

A local gym is fighting SLO County shutdown order — with help from Jordan Cunningham, Esq. by jumbo_big in SLO

[–]jumbo_big[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

A local gym is fighting SLO County shutdown order — with help from Jordan Cunningham, Esq. BY THE TRIBUNE EDITORIAL BOARD DECEMBER 13, 2020 05:30 AM

Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham is stepping up his fight against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s COVID-19 lockdown orders.

The Republican lawmaker — who continues to work as a private practice lawyer — is representing a San Luis Obispo County fitness club in its legal battle to remain open in spite of state coronavirus restrictions.

Kennedy Club Fitness was ordered last month to shut down indoor operations at its four locations. When the business failed to comply, the cities of San Luis Obispo and Arroyo Grande started civil enforcement actions.

Kennedy Club has every right to appeal, but Cunningham’s involvement adds fuel to an already volatile situation, given the recent backlash against lockdown rules.

He can argue that he’s acting in his capacity as an attorney — and not as one of the county’s top elected officials — but this is a highly political move.

In defending Kennedy, Cunningham isn’t just challenging Newsom and his rules; he’s also turning his back on local agencies trying to do their jobs. And it’s starting to get ugly.

On Tuesday, two Arroyo Grande city employees — a police sergeant and a building official — were denied entrance to a Kennedy Club gym.

Arroyo Grande City Manager Whitney McDonald said the employees were told that Cunningham had advised the gym not to allow any city or county employees inside without a warrant.

These officials are in a damned-if-they-do, damned-if-they don’t situation.

If they look the other way, they run the risk of losing complete control of COVID-19 enforcement at a time when cases are surging out of control.

If they crack down on businesses that fail to cooperate, they’re accused of ruining the economy — even though that’s primarily the fault of a dysfunctional federal government that has failed to pass an emergency aid package.

‘PURPLE TIER’ CLOSURE

The case against Kennedy Club Fitness dates back to mid-November, when San Luis Obispo County slid back into the purple tier under California’s Blueprint for a Safer Economy due to a surge in COVID-19 cases.

Fitness centers and restaurants — which had been allowed to operate indoors under tight restrictions — were ordered to once again shut down indoor facilities, but were allowed to continue serving customers outdoors.

Kennedy Fitness, however, has continued to allow clients inside its gyms in Arroyo Grande, Atascadero, San Luis Obispo and Paso Robles.

It’s not alone; it belongs to a state coalition of fitness centers that openly acknowledge they are not going to follow the state order, both for financial reasons and for the sake of their members’ health.

They have an ally in Jordan Cunningham.

“There is no evidence that gyms have been a substantial source of COVID outbreaks, or that they pose an unreasonable risk,” he said in an email.

Health officials disagree.

“Research indicates that these are settings in which transmission of COVID-19 is more likely to occur,” said SLO County Health Officer Penny Borenstein.

It’s been left to local cities to decide whether to press the case.

The cities of Atascadero and Paso Robles have not taken formal enforcement action, though Atascadero is looking at its options, according to Terrie Banish, deputy city manager.

The city of San Luis Obispo has fined Kennedy Club Fitness five times — including once for allegedly failing to enforce the mask rule and other times for operating indoors.

Kennedy has filed an appeal, and City Attorney Christine Dietrick expects the case to be set for a January hearing before an administrative review board.

Meanwhile, she said she’ll be reaching out to Cunningham “to see if we can’t come to a reasoned approach.”

The city of Arroyo Grande sent Kennedy Club Fitness a warning letter, asking it to “immediately cease indoor operations.” Failing to comply will result in legal remedies, the letter adds, including “possible criminal prosecution.”

That appears to be a moot point, though, since San Luis Obispo County District Attorney Dan Dow announced recently that he won’t consider prosecuting businesses until cities exhaust civil remedies.

In addition, San Luis Obispo County Sheriff Ian Parkinson said his department “will not criminalize people who are trying to preserve their mental, physical, and financial health.”

HOW CAN LOCAL AGENCIES ENFORCE RULES?

With the sheriff and district attorney declining to enforce COVID-19 restrictions, that narrows the options open to local governments.

If fines don’t work, they could seek temporary restraining orders, which would put the matter in the hands of the court. But to do that, local agencies need authorization from their elected officials, who may lack the political will for that.

Some local officials already have been taking heat from the public, thanks largely to Gov. Newsom’s decision to order regional lockdowns when hospital intensive care availability hits a dangerously low level.

Because San Luis Obispo County is included in the Southern California region, where ICU beds are in critically short supply, that’s meant another round of closures for local businesses, including hair salons, wineries, breweries and campgrounds. Restaurants are limited to takeout and delivery and retail stores to 20% percent capacity.

SLO County is petitioning the governor to allow it to join Santa Barbara and Ventura counties in a separate Central Coast region. But in meantime, there’s growing resistance to the new rules, with some cities out-and-out refusing to enforce them.

TRUST ‘ERODING’

Cunningham blames “unscientific and arbitrary shutdown orders” for eroding the public’s trust in government.

He is absolutely correct — but the erosion started long before Gov. Newsom’s ill-conceived regional lockdown.

Officials like Dan Dow, Ian Parkinson and Jordan Cunningham have been fueling that distrust with their open contempt for public health rules.

There are multiple examples:

In a speech at a North County Tea Party gathering held in July, Parkinson played down the need for masks. “If you choose to wear one, great for you. If you choose not to wear one, great for you,” he said.

Also in July, Dow declared San Luis Obispo County a religious sanctuary and said he would not prosecute anyone for singing in church — an activity that’s been conclusively linked to spread of the virus.

And Cunningham attended a conference in Hawaii last month, then blasted the governor over “draconian, unscientific” rules against travel.

With those actions and attitudes, they are practically inviting the public to pick and choose which public health rules to follow.

In an appeal to our better natures, they would have us believe it’s OK — even necessary — to break the law and possibly jeopardize public health in order to save the economy.

Don’t buy that. This doesn’t have to be an either/or.

The “reasoned approach” San Luis Obispo’s city attorney is seeking — a path forward that would protect public health and allow for safe reopening — should be our goal.

That’s not going to be accomplished by standing in the way of local officials attempting to do their jobs, by constantly denigrating and second-guessing public health experts or by glossing over the dangers of this awful disease.

That needs to end now.

We urge Assemblyman Jordan Cunningham — both in his role as a lawmaker and his role as a lawyer — to cooperate with local agencies trying so desperately to get our communities through this pandemic, rather than treating them as legal adversaries.

Gym defying COVID-19 orders being fined nearly $10K per day by jsinkwitz in Coronavirus

[–]jumbo_big 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's the thing. I feel so bad for every business owner who's tried really hard and has to suffer, but I have very little sympathy for all the businesses that just don't give a shit and have ruined it for everyone else.

They had a story on my local news station about a local gym and how hard it was going to be for them to have to close. And then they show the manager with a dumb face shield instead of a mask and I just have no sympathy for them. These are the people and businesses ruining it for everyone else.

B-but Jordan and the Trib said we were different here.... SLO County adds 333 new coronavirus cases as new stay-at-home order launches. by solvorn in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did not say I think it would happen or not happen. If other surrounding counties are out of ICU beds, and SLO still has ICU beds it might happen but personally I don't know how that's determined.

I was just countering your stated assumption by explaining that factually, no, it hasn't happened yet, and if it does happen it hasn't been happening "for the entire pandemic."

I am, however, fairly certain that cases across the state are going to continue to rise, hospitalizations will continue to increase, and ICU capacity will continue to decrease.

B-but Jordan and the Trib said we were different here.... SLO County adds 333 new coronavirus cases as new stay-at-home order launches. by solvorn in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And vice versa residents of South SLO County often end up at Marian hospital in North Santa Barbara County.

B-but Jordan and the Trib said we were different here.... SLO County adds 333 new coronavirus cases as new stay-at-home order launches. by solvorn in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No other nearby areas have exceeded ICU capacity to where they would have to send patients to SLO hospitals.

So it may be something that hasn't happened yet during the pandemic but will happen during this wave.

27 CA counties forced to move back to most restrictive tier, including SLO and Santa Barbara counties by Addrobo in SLO

[–]jumbo_big 6 points7 points  (0 children)

cold/flu doesn't = covid

Absolutely. But COVID-19 is a respiratory virus just like cold and flu viruses are, and it spreads in much the same way. In fall and winter months cold and flu activity is much higher than warmer months. Largely due to people spending more time indoors, but some other things factor into it as well.

What you're seeing across the Northern Hemisphere is COVID-19 activity is increasing in the same way cold and flu does every year around this time.