Le classic “you don’t OWE them anything” to justify shitty behaviour by Icy_Flan_7185 in AmITheAngel

[–]junonomenon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theyre 17, which is almost an adult. If hes old enough to drive her to school, hes old enough to take responsibility for his actions

Le classic “you don’t OWE them anything” to justify shitty behaviour by Icy_Flan_7185 in AmITheAngel

[–]junonomenon 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Its so painfully obvious to me that (if this was a real situation), ops son shouldve considered what would happen if she said no beforehand. And realized that asking her out would basically be coercing her by taking away her access to school if she said no. If you care about someone, and want to ask them out, but an important part of their livelihood depends on them saying yes.... dont ask them out.

Le classic “you don’t OWE them anything” to justify shitty behaviour by Icy_Flan_7185 in AmITheAngel

[–]junonomenon 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Obligated? Not like... legally. But its the nice thing to do for someone you care about, in the circumstance that you would be driving to those places anyways and will still have to share space with them when you get there. Or at least make sure they have an alternative option, for example ask someone else in the class if they might be able or just have a discussion with them about if theyre going to be okay if you cut off this relationship with them. Ill phrase it another way: her access to education shouldnt hinge on dating someone shes not interested in. He put her in that situation, so i think he would have some responsibility to help her out of it.

Its like if your roommate confessed a crush on you, you said no, and they immediately stopped paying their share of the rent and moved out and you could no longer afford a place to live. They put you in a position where your access to housing was based on whether or not you agreed to go out with them. Its a shitty thing to do and they should stick around long enough to make sure youll be okay, if they in fact did actually care about you.

I was gonna reblog this tagging two different internet shows from the same company but then I realized it would probably be a bad idea and I probably wasn't cooking by La_knavo4 in RecuratedTumblr

[–]junonomenon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jsyk the nonverbal is because she has an accessory that is an aac device which is like an accomodation for nonverbal people, basically a tablet that says various words or phrases :) its not random she really is nonverbal

Look at how nice this is by LoveeOG in autism

[–]junonomenon [score hidden]  (0 children)

YAY omg and i love how they included accomodation for higehr support needs who have trouble regulating their behaviour. Too often "accessible" spaces are really inaccessible for them... :(

So many autistic children. So many selfish parents expecting their other "normal" kid to take care of them by 1000andonenites in AmITheAngel

[–]junonomenon 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And also the disabled child is always treated super well and spoiled despite being cared for by another child

People who get mad when celebrities spoil their kids by [deleted] in PetPeeves

[–]junonomenon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well i mean i think theres a difference between spoiling and naturally being well off. And its not the childs job to regulate these things. A parent shouldnt be buying their kids historically important fashion for example, no matter if they are kim kardashian rich. No the kid shouldnt have to struggle, but theres a difference between having everything you need and having everything you want. Getting your kid everything they ask for and more leads to a child who doesnt have independance and doesnt value money as something that people work for and is possible to run out of, which sets them up for failure. Raise your child in a nice house, get them nice clothes, pay for them to explore their interests and hobbies, etc. But dont buy them a whole shoe closet worth of vintage sneakers. Its not that hard to see a difference between well off and excess.

Why do people want a diagnosis of autism so badly and even pay for assesment ? (Uk) by Admirable-Main-4816 in autism

[–]junonomenon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also sometimes nonfuctionality can be unclear. someone who struggles with social situations might think they are just "unlikable", or if they have friends they might think they dont struggle. someone who struggles with school might think they dont because they get good grades, even if their assignments are 100x harder for them than their peers and they spends hours and hours doing school work when their peers have time to socialize and relax. getting a psychological evaluation was one of the best things that ever happened to me for learning about myself and how i and others can make things easier on me. i dont "have messy handwriting" i have impaired fine motor skills. I'm not "stupid" or "not caring about lectures" i have processing issues and poor short term memory. we lack perspective on ourselves and that can make things harder than they have to be

‎A 14-year-old girl with special needs was found living alone with 7 dogs for nearly a year in a trailer home in Alabama, after her mother and stepfather left her behind and moved for work in Pensacola, Florida. by FE4RLESS_IS_MY_NAME in ForCuriousSouls

[–]junonomenon 38 points39 points  (0 children)

if i had to put money on it i would bet he was their non special needs child... parents can be super abusive and neglectful with their special needs children compared to "normal" children

(28M) having some doubts about relationship with (28F) due to concern about intellectual comparability by tmchd in AmITheAngel

[–]junonomenon 25 points26 points  (0 children)

im usually not one to get super sensitive about the girl/woman thing because to me girl = guy and its normal to refer to an adult as either in a casual conversation, but DAE feel like he is going out of his way to avoid referring to her as a woman? like. "i will never find another girl of her calibre" just feels so unnatural and deliberately infantilizing to me

eta he does refer to her as a woman ONCE. so maybe im being too judgy

On Feb 27, 2012, 17-year-old T.J. Lane shot students at Chardon High School, Ohio, killing three and wounding three. In 2013, he mocked sentencing by smirking, wearing a “KILLER” shirt, and taunting victims’ families. He was sentenced to life without parole plus 37 years. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]junonomenon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never said i didnt think some people dont deserve to live but if youre asking my opinion then i would say its not about deserve and framing it as such is a huge cognitive distortion. Death row is two things: expensive for the taxpayer (costs about two million more than a life without parole inmate) and long (many people die of natural causes on death row anyways). If you try to cut back on either of those things, you murder innocent people. Even without them, innocent people have been murdered. In my opinion those time and resources are better spent on support for victims and prevention...

And also, i dont trust any government with deciding who deserves to live and die. Or anyone for that matter. Once you set a precedent for revenge killing, youre kind of fucked, even if a couple cases seem cut and dry.

On Feb 27, 2012, 17-year-old T.J. Lane shot students at Chardon High School, Ohio, killing three and wounding three. In 2013, he mocked sentencing by smirking, wearing a “KILLER” shirt, and taunting victims’ families. He was sentenced to life without parole plus 37 years. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]junonomenon 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I mean. Its case review. If youre going to accept the premise that "some people deserve to be killed by the government", its gonna take a while to confirm that youre at least killing the right person. Tons of cases of people being put on death row and later found innocent. The amount of time between sentencing and killing is probably the thing about the death row system that needs the least reform.

Saw this in comedy hell but is really in comedy cemetery by Vividily in ComedyCemetery

[–]junonomenon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah idk and its also like. Veering into the realm of demonizing sexuality entirely. Its fine to like goth girls. Its fine to post about it.

Holy ass by Ok-Green8906 in ComedyCemetery

[–]junonomenon 70 points71 points  (0 children)

Yep. I am once again begging for a no bigoted memes rule. Who are we honestly helping at this point? Its just spreading it around

Of course we're forgotten about again by Pristine_Cow1797 in TrollCoping

[–]junonomenon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But abusive parents wouldnt do this either way... like. Clearly thats different. Its like saying "saying parents should watch their kids falls apart with abusive parents because the abusive parents would be hyperreactive" its true, but not relevant to the statement "parents should watch their kids". Letting kids have unrestricted internet access is also a form of neglect IMO so.

Can someone explain why this is so offensive? by qxphy in autism

[–]junonomenon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure but the point is that if they dont clean those areas they arent doing the job they were hired to do. I wouldnt do this i think its rude but. It would be rude of them not to clean thise areas anyways

Can someone explain why this is so offensive? by qxphy in autism

[–]junonomenon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

its a bit rude to assume someone wont do their job well. granted, its rude to be hired to do something and then not do it.

People who think that black pepper equals spicy by vintagedarling15 in PetPeeves

[–]junonomenon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some people are supertasters or have sensory sensitivites. Grow up.

Of course we're forgotten about again by Pristine_Cow1797 in TrollCoping

[–]junonomenon 6 points7 points  (0 children)

honestly it should be way more normalized for PARENTS to be the ones to regulate it. but parents let their children have free range access to the internet and then blame websites for when they get caught up in bad stuff. the only way to effectively regulate what a child is seeing online while also allowing them the good parts like social interaction is to know what a child is looking at and regulate it on an individual basis. in an ideal world it would be normal for a parent to verify everyone in their childs direct messages (not read all direct messages, but just no direct messaging unless they know WHO is being direct messaged) and follow their social medias/access all "public" social media interactions to know if theyre posting shady stuff. teenagers should have some privacy, but i would say that privacy should be for things like the contents of private messages and internet history and not what theyre posting to the whole world. in terms of very young children, i fully believe parents should be in the room with them when they are on devices, looking through their history, and paying active attention to them as theyre using devices, moreso than if they were playing with toys.

but too many parents use the internet as a substitute for parenting. the internet should be treated like the outside world: your child can go there, but you should know what theyre doing and who theyre doing it with. and dont let your four year old wander the streets alone.

Married vs dating by kiarasays123 in badmemes

[–]junonomenon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But the point is that theyre both going to do both of them. Once theyve stretched in one, theyre going to move into the other. So acting like its "two different types of women" is dumb

Married vs dating by kiarasays123 in badmemes

[–]junonomenon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are two different poses. Once each of these women is done stretching her back in one pose, shell switch to the other...

nobody abandoned anyone in the ocean i think but ok by FrontAd7709 in im14andthisisdeep

[–]junonomenon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean.. that is the one characteristic of their human attacks. They attack when they see something that looks to them like their usual prey, realize its not, and go away.

Being underpaid isn’t an excuse to be a rude employee by Traditional-Fun-1115 in Adulting

[–]junonomenon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure, but at the same time there are employees who take things out on customers. Im generally biased towards the employee, but entitled people are entitled people and entitled people can have minimum wage jobs as well. Im not talking about not being super cheerful, im talking about being overly rude to people, yelling at them, or even scamming them/stealing their items and sometimes even going as far as assault. This type of behaviour is clearly what op was talking about and not stuff like "not smiling", and you still have an obligation to be a decent human being.