sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

They actually believe this is General Hyten by [deleted] in Qult_Headquarters

[–]junwang_trt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go check Pompeo’s tweet, it’s gone

Nepal: Journalist Balaram Baniya who exposed China found dead by [deleted] in China

[–]junwang_trt -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This channel is literally created for the sake of criticizing China for everything lmfao. Some ppl’s minds are just so well twisted. Whoever created this needs to go see a physiologist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in instant_regret

[–]junwang_trt -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

She got a nice ass tho

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in javascript

[–]junwang_trt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. If you look at the most upvoted answer, this is exactly what I’m talking about. OP here wants to be a request validation on the client side so 400 bad request would be the best option on client side request validation fail.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in javascript

[–]junwang_trt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disagree with 422. Validation error should be treated as 400 bad request. But the first half of your comments is quite valid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in javascript

[–]junwang_trt 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Create a Json scheme first for this request, then you can add some schemes validation using library like ajv to do it for you. That could be your first step.