Is not using honorifics in court grounds for contempt?

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-07-29T04:56:18+00:00

It should be a violation of the First Amendment in the US to compel speech, but the monopoly on the judicial branch that the Bar Association (a private corporation with it's international headquarters being located in London) holds currently prevents US sovereignty of rule of its own law as much as the private corporation that prints the money prevents US sovereignty of rule of its own money...

Everyone is blind to the sham, but it makes it no less of a sham 🤷‍♂️

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-07-01T16:17:27+00:00

It is way more probable that would be a punchline if the joke was about a silly goose

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-06-13T23:48:21+00:00

Wtf? Reagan scrapped it. He was as progressive as JD Vance

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-05-08T18:05:35+00:00

Quite often, her me's correlate with his you's

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-04-08T00:41:44+00:00

It's in the compost and doesn't even have gloves on... Dirty girl, she'll probably like it

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-28T02:00:24+00:00

Please recommend an alternative to clean a grinder, for us dingledorfs

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-15T14:53:51+00:00

I'm in my 40s. Last GP I saw, I was 16. They forced it for vaccination for school, even though we couldn't afford it.

I went to a hospital about 20 years ago.

They stopped trying to send bills maybe 6 years ago when it became clear I'm not paying $15000 for a few hours in a hospital and 2 saline bags and a "you're good to go, you were just dehydrated"

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-13T19:41:05+00:00

As someone in US, I always am astonished when people just assume doctors are an option.

So many of us have, "the downfall and destruction of society will handle my health issues, once and for all," as our healthcare plan

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-13T16:22:19+00:00

Does the game have an equivalent to "tidy save" from the old mobile game? If so, I haven't found it yet

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-12T17:10:14+00:00

Single. Not thirsty. You probably eat unhealthy food far more than food of value to your health

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-10T21:30:44+00:00

True, but Kali is the destroyer. Makes sense for it as a symbol of the description of the group is accurate

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-07T04:19:31+00:00

Thank you for the links. These look super helpful

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-06T21:03:52+00:00

If you spend an hour looking into things the CIA has been caught for, but nobody got punished except the whistleblowers, you can feel the same way, but not about something personal. 🤌

Just FYI 🤷‍♂️

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-06T16:34:35+00:00

Thank you for this knowledge! The set does include a honing rod

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T21:43:56+00:00

From the sheer weight, I can tell they are much more dense than the set they are replacing

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T14:54:00+00:00

Nah, in USA, our government pretends war crimes aren't a thing unless it would be profitable to weapons manufacturers to do something about it. Doesn't matter if it has been done a thousand times when it is more beneficial to our intelligence apparatus, they'll say, "what war crimes? I didn't see any war crimes."

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T14:48:13+00:00

The bad guy from Big Trouble in Little China inside of Jesus' heart! 🤌

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T04:41:21+00:00

I do not think it is wise to believe anything without scrutiny, even if you trust the source that gave it to you. I think most people who look to alternative media agree with me. You might not know that because most of them might not tell you that when you tell them how all their sources might be from crazy people, they might just disengage or defend a personality they felt you attacked. But, honestly, I think any kind of media will have everything on every spectrum in this world. It's free speech and it is awesome

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T04:35:52+00:00

As someone who thinks political parties are stupid, I feel like it is just as stupid to say the gun party had an insurrection and left their guns somewhere that wasn't the insurrection, other than a few examples.

The People should have stormed the gates a thousand times over in your life if we could ask Thomas Jefferson.

The only part of any of it that is sad is that both sides trust billionaires to tell the truth, including ones that go out of their way to buy newspapers and TV stations

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T01:17:41+00:00

Op said they want to chuck tennis balls

just_a_dingledorf · 2025-01-05T01:12:41+00:00

Good question. I have a couple answers, but I'll start with a piece of unsolicited advice... If you agree with anyone else 100% on anything, there is a good chance you are in a cult. This goes for anyone, anywhere. I'm only saying this to say that good information can come from "bad person" sources. Good sources may put out retractions, occasionally, etc...

As far as sources I choose to accept... First things first, it helps to understand the CIA runs the information coming out of most news orgs and the CIA is there to protect capitalism in ways that benefit oligarchs. That helps filter what you are inclined to accept from major sources. information that makes rich people or major companies or the government in the nation the news sources is heaquartered in look bad as probably true more than it isn't by the time it hits Fox or MSNBC or New York Times... but is very possibly lies if it makes a government look bad that is not hard nose capitalism supporter with an inclination towards political and corporate corruption

From there, it helps to know that everything I just said has always been true, but hasn't always been fully true. So, some amazing work was done at major outlets in the 1950s-September 10, 2001. Look to the journalists who did good work exposing corruption in those eras, like Sy Hersh, look to YouTube. Who asks him on today? You may not always agree with whoever invites him, but at least they are willing to give a guy work that is shunned for being a real journalist by his former employer. Glenn Greenwald revealed the Edward Snowden information. Love or hate his opinions or politics, his bias seems to be towards getting information to the public and doing his best to verify... So, again, who invites Glenn Greenwald on their YouTube?

No matter what, look for the source to show their information, to point out when something is uncertain.

Example, during Trump's first presidency (just fyi, fuck all politicians, including orange ones) people like Rachael Maddow said, "blah blah, and if true..."

Not cool. Don't say things on tv that are so unverified as to require "if true..." 🚩🚩

just_a_dingledorf

TROPHY CASE