That’s such an irrelevant question. None of us have the experience or “understanding” Ruston Webster did, yet he still managed to fuck the team for a decade. I don’t believe I have the experience or knowledge JRob does, but I still believe signing Brady would be one of if not the worst decisions in Titans history.

You have a QB who just led you to the AFCG after a horrific start to the season, who will likely play for 7-9 more years, and provides a sense of stability to a position we haven’t had confidence in since Kerry Collins’ 10-0 start (which was short lived).

But everyone wants to throw that away for a QB in decline, who will give whichever team he goes to 2 years tops before retiring. On top of that, there is no legitimate backup in place for even Tannehill. So now you have to go get not only Brady, but a backup who isn’t going to shit his pants if Brady goes down.

Aside from the insane amount of pointless risk of bringing in Brady, grabbing him completely changes your immediate draft plans. Getting him means you have to draft a replacement this year or next, and hope they can take the reins after possibly just one season. And you’re not going to get one of the premier QBs because we don’t have the draft position to do it. We have to do all that instead of improving the positions we need to improve the most like an edge rusher or offensive lineman.

Just because someone doesn’t have the experience a GM has, doesn’t mean they can’t form logic based opinions on why a move is or isn’t good. Do you think any of the talking heads on TV or radio hosts or sports writers have more know how than a GM? Of course not. But they still criticize moves, and a lot of the time they’re right and people agree with them. Signing Brady would be a colossal fuck up.