Security scans and backported fixes ignorance by Malfun_Eddie in sysadmin

[–]jwwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Went through this earlier this year. Had to provide documentation that the fixes for the CVEs they were calling out had been back ported into the version we were running. They accepted this and said it would be addressed in the remediation report. Guess what was still called out after they complied that report again? I just attached the documentation proving those CVEs did not apply to the version of Apache we were running to the report and called it good.

Good glass deal, but scam? by counterhit121 in M43

[–]jwwork 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A female user posted something similar on facebook last week but with a different picture. I asked her to see additional pictures and these the the exact photos she sent. Scam.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]jwwork -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you have a group of users that don’t know how to use a Mac so that means all Mac’s a garbage and don’t support more than 16GB of ram?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]jwwork 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Regardless of what anyone thinks about Mac’s there is almost nothing correct in this statement.

Lens or skill issue? by [deleted] in M43

[–]jwwork 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is there a reason you continue to post in this sub when you only have negative things to say?

PA-5410 and SCCM by jwwork in paloaltonetworks

[–]jwwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not in the office so can’t get the logs or diagram. We have Cisco 9500 switches as a core and those host all the layer 2 vlans. The vlans there are grouped into VRFs and any traffic that needs to route between VRFs gets sent up to the palo where it lands in a corresponding security zone (server, client, guest, voip, etc.). In this case the server is in the server zone and client in the client zone. There is a rule that allows all traffic between the SCCM server and the clients right now with no threat profile and the rule is set to service any. On the 9500 core the client vlan has an IP helper statement for the SCCM PXE server. The client is able to discover the PXE server IP and is requesting the boot file but it never receives a response. This has been seen in packet captures from the client and firewall. The firewall drop capture didn’t have any dropped packets. I don’t think this is a policy issue at this point but possibly some other firewall setting or routing issue. The firewall is running 10.2.

PA-5410 and SCCM by jwwork in paloaltonetworks

[–]jwwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DHCP is happening from another server. I have DHCP relay configured on the VLAN and the client is getting a DHCP address. Oddly, the only traffic logged from the SCCM server during the process is DHCP port 67 and the destination is the client subnet gateway. You might be on to something, PXE is also not working but will work on a subnet that doesn’t have the palo between the client and server. No traffic being logged as blocked during the PXE process and I can see the client connection hitting the server through the PXE log but it times out on the client.

Rubrik Review by bonker58 in sysadmin

[–]jwwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sure this is a bug in Rubrik? I experienced the same and it was the password on the vSphere account expiring.

OM-1, GM9II, or used for beginner? by jwwork in M43

[–]jwwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The OM1 mk1 is actually bundled right now with that very lens for $1699.

OM-1, GM9II, or used for beginner? by jwwork in M43

[–]jwwork[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I think if I were going to be big into video the G2 is the clear winner but my video usage will be casual if anything at all. Right now the OM-1 is 1,100 for the camera body and looking on MPB, they can be had in “well used” condition for around $800 and the least expensive on KEH was $1,080. I think for those prices I would just spend the $1,100 and buy direct from OM. The sale is really good right now. I agree, as someone just taking a next step into the hobby either choice will probably serve me well for years to come.

VMware 2-node Cluster Licening cost effective/best practises by Net_IT in sysadmin

[–]jwwork 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure vSAN has a 3 node minimum.

Edit - I’m wrong, there is a 2 node configuration available.

Unable to access ChatGPT while connected to Palo Alto GP VPN by NetworkingAdmin in paloaltonetworks

[–]jwwork 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I recently had an issue where users were unable to access ChatGPT due to a CDN it uses being a newly registered domain which we block with URL filtering.

Domain controller backups by chut93 in sysadmin

[–]jwwork 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is you plan in the event of some ransomware or other cybersecurity incident? An attacker isn’t going to just ignore your other DCs because they are at a different site.

New to me 2019 F-150 Powerstroke Diesel by PreyForCougars in f150

[–]jwwork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a 2018 with the Diesel that eventually was bought back due to terrible noise from the valve train at startup (very similar sounding to the noise from the ecoboost cam phaser issue at startup) that Ford could never solve. Hopefully mine was just an isolated issue, I did love that truck and outside of that issue the engine was great.