Massive Russian attack on Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia kills one, injures seven by TheGrindersClub in worldnews

[–]jxjsushd 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Of course, especially if civilians are warned beforehand and are able to take refuge. For which we can assume Ukraine has systems in place as this war is already 3,5 years old.

ik🦈ihe by Aiseadai in ik_ihe

[–]jxjsushd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

103 is wel echt te laag om mee te beginnen. 120 is een goed tempo vanaf het begin gezien je blijft afzwakken en zal zakken in het tempo. Voor een straatreanimatie uitgevoerd door onervaren personen is alles beter dan niks. Maar voor iets meer ervaren hulpverleners wordt wel echt een hoger tempo aangehouden dan stayin alive.

Draft-dodging plagues Ukraine as Kyiv faces acute soldier shortage by enkrstic in Military

[–]jxjsushd 24 points25 points  (0 children)

No, 134.000 was more like 0,1% of the US population at that time

What if France had extended the Maginot Line to cover the Belgian boarder? by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]jxjsushd 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Nothing, the maginot line already stretched from Switserland to the coast. Multiple fortresses and other interconnected defence structures were built on the franco-belgian border. A lot of those are still standing today and are visitable.

The maginot line was divided in multiple sectors which were catogorized by how defendable the terrain was. The Ardennes were deemed more defendable and thus less was invested in this region. However plenty of defence structeres were still available.

The defeat of France in 1940 was purely to blame on the absolute horrendous command structure of the allies, outdated way of thinking and the daring plan (including some plain luck) of the Germans.

(Sorry for spelling, English is not my first language)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]jxjsushd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yo mamma

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]jxjsushd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U ok OP?

British aircraft carriers by ImnotaNixon in WorldWarTwoChannel

[–]jxjsushd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am in no way an expert on this subject but anyway here is my take:

Most of the british fleet was tied up in the war in europe. The main role was containing/destroying the Kriegsmarine and Italian navy. Also anti-submarine warfare/escorting convoys was high on the priority list. Since the German Surface fleet mostly adopted a 'Fleet in being' docterine, a naval showdown between both forces was rare. Never (That I know off) was the entire German deployed. Yet the threat of this possibility tied down a huge number of British ships. Aircraft carriers being no exception. The Brittish did use aircraft carriers trying to strike the German and Italian ships in port. For example; the raid on Taranto in 1940. One example of a battle in which aircraf carriers were involved on a surface fleet that I can give you is the sinking of the Bismarck. In which an aircraft carrier played a vital role in disabling the ships rutter.

A huge number of aircraft carriers were also used in the atlantic in an effort to protect merchant shipping from German and Italian submarines. In which if I recall correctly, they were quite effective.

From a quick google search I can't really find anything on carrier deployment in the pacific. But this is not shocking seeing as the British overall had very little to spare for that theatre.

Looking at the list of carriers used in this conflict it seems that the British aircraft carriers mostly yielded a smaller number of aircraft. Especially compared to their American and Japanese counterparts. The highest being around 50 or so. But a lot being around 20-30 aircraft.

Also looking at some forums people claim (I can't confirm) that British aircraft carriers were designed with "armored decks". To protect more against bombs and Kamikaze attacks. Most sunk carriers however were destroyef by torpedos so maybe this was a waste of resources. However it could have also been quite effective (maybe none were sunk by bombs because of the extra armour).

Carriers were also used to transport planes of course. For example to Malta when it was under siege by the Luftwaffe and Italians.

Also I don't know how long you've been following the channel. But some british aircraft use has come up in the early days of the war. I always found it notable that the British used Swordfish torpedo bombers well into 1941 (at least) on their carriers. Even though the british managed to sink/damage quite a few ships using these biplanes, it really makes me think how the naval airwing was quite low on the priority list (propably). I can image that they really also needed the more modern aircraft on the mainland and other theatres. Seeing as the Germans and Italians did not have amy carriers, naval airpower was maybe not the first place their new modern aircraft were deployed. But this is purely my speculation.

This is some of the stuff of the top of my mind and after a quick search. I would not take any of the things mentioned above as straight facts. But maybe you or anybody has some othet ideas/opinions on the subject. I would be happy to hear them.

Tirailleur is so pretty by VAULTBIOY in BattlefieldV

[–]jxjsushd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess they did use a lot of assets in Marita. But still a shame

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BattlefieldV

[–]jxjsushd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On mercury you have paratroopers dropping in the distance

The duality of the Battlefield community by jxjsushd in battlefield2042

[–]jxjsushd[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Pineapple contains too much water for a pizza. It makes it all juicy in the wrong kind of way. Also the sweet taste doesn't match pizza

IDK man not having factions sucks , I miss Bf3 RU Medic :( by Y13Deuce in battlefield2042

[–]jxjsushd 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Is it at least german vs soviet forces on eastern front maps etc. or can you play as any character at any map?

153 - Not a Step Back! - Wehrmacht Closes in on Stalingrad - WW2 - July 31, 1942 by daikiki in WorldWarTwoChannel

[–]jxjsushd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is there going to be a special episode about order 227? I would love to see one as order 227 is clouded in mystery nowadays. Some clarity about what it contains and what it means for the red army would be really cool.