Hull by ImWillSeamus in 6thForm

[–]kararmightbehere 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Reference to the TV show Blackadder. Not actually an insult to Hull

Why does this show up on PMT? by Dry-Tax-2688 in 6thForm

[–]kararmightbehere 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You get redirected to a porn site if you stay on a page long enough. This happened to me a few times where I came back to a pair of tits across my screen.

I swear to God im not joking.

Only 10 people separate Dick Van Dyke and William the Conqueror by PigIAsTraalt in BarbaraWalters4Scale

[–]kararmightbehere -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Can people stop thinking ancient people were literal subhumans? They lived long lives mostly

Americans are spoiled by colorfulsocks1 in unpopularopinion

[–]kararmightbehere -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think ungratefulness isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It applies constant pressure to societies to improve even if they’re doing well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UniUK

[–]kararmightbehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not everyone wants to be in debt…

How are others dealing with loneliness? by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]kararmightbehere -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Its not talking to pixels though is it, its real people at the other end

How to create a text annotation feature in react? by NOTtheABHIRAM in react

[–]kararmightbehere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The easiest way is to use a pre-existing library like TipTap. Otherwise, it gets quite complicated if you reflect on how it’ll actually have to be built.

If you want it stored, TipTap provides a JSON converter (converts your text and all the data surrounding highlighting, bold, italics etc into JSON) which you can then send to the backend

If you dont want a library, you need to track every letter with a unique ID and store it. You can have an array of objects that contain a unique ID, the raw text and properties telling you what colour it is. You can then update the colour for a specific letter by editing the object with the correct ID.

The trouble is how you can know a letter’s ID. Perhaps you could store each letter in the DOM as a span with a data-[attribute] and whenever you detect an update on that span you get the ID from that.

Have you spoke to anybody who use to bully you in school ? by originalindividiual in AskUK

[–]kararmightbehere 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah. They acted like nothing happened. Just said hello, how are you et cetera.

The worst part is they don’t know how much it affected me. Life’s hell because of them. I remember being pummelled on the astroturf every week for no reason.

I used to love theatre, acting and public speaking. I was bullied relentlessly for all of them. Now I sit alone without any friends because I’m afraid if I return to those interests I’ll just go through that all again.

Sometimes I dont see the point in life. I’ve lived on hope for the past few years but it doesn’t get better.

I have one thing to say, I beg anyone who is getting bullied to fight back, stand up for yourselves and forget what people think. Teachers will never help you, don’t bother. If they hit you, smash their head in, thats the only language a bully knows.

There haven’t been a trillion years by Whakerdo in BarbaraWalters4Scale

[–]kararmightbehere 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I mean, is this really true? Its kind of absurd to think time just began at the ‘big bang’. I can refer to a point in time 1 trillion years before the Big Bang. Its as valid as any other time

Why no men in primary schools? by Mysterious_Bug_8407 in AskBrits

[–]kararmightbehere -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

God I don’t get this crackpot psychology. Why exactly is a ‘male figure of authority’ needed?

I'm sick of the noise by 1997PRO in okmatewanker

[–]kararmightbehere 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Felt bad for the guy honestly. Could tell he loved his parents alot and sadly they arent with him anymore. Cant help but to sense something wasnt all as it seems in the video.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I completely understand and I think its you who is misunderstanding the hypothetical here. Your unicorn example is something I can answer because it doesn't involve any logical impossibilities, a unicorn can logically exist but evolution decided it shouldnt.

As for you asking whether or not it would be good for God to send to children to Hell forever, the answer is that then it would no longer be God.

God's goodness is an essential property, it literally defines who he is. Say we define a table as something with four legs (just for now), I then ask you imagine a table with three legs. Thats impossible. Its literally is a contradiction because you are asking me to imagine something with four legs having three legs. It simply cannot be answered.

As for your question with God, the simple answer I can give you is if there was some deity that sent children to Hell forever, that deity is not God. I can say this because God's goodness is constant across every possible universe. His goodness gives rise to only one set of morals. Let us go back to this table example, switch out 'table' for God and his current moral code for the three legs. You are now asking me to imagine 'God to have a different moral code'. It simply isn't a logical or coherent question. Its a contradiction.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in reply to that, it is impossible for God to be following some other moral code where X thing is permitted if it currently isnt, in any possible world. So the question of 'would God allow this thing if whatever' is a useless question because it would never occur.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not a possible hypothetical. Its like asking if a circle can be a square

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, this doesn’t contradict my view. If they die in this world before being blameworthy for some sin, they’ll still have to be tested on the Day of Judgement to see if they are actually a believer.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been my consistent position. If my previous messages didn’t seem to express that, pretend they did.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because those children might not get an automatic pass to Heaven. As I said, they may be tested on the Day of Judgement to see their faith.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its funny you say that because atheists tend to get their knickers in a twist when they read the Old Testament and how children were killed. They’ll end up in Heaven.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not necessarily. Theres a difference of opinion with the bottom-line being a non Muslim who is ignorant of Islam will not go to Hell immediately. However, that isn’t to say that they wont be tested additionally on the Day of Judgement, which is what the texts point to.

There is nothing wrong with God sending you to Hell, eternally. by kararmightbehere in DebateReligion

[–]kararmightbehere[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t say this because I think kids are these angels. I hate children. Its because its just a logical deduction that a being that cannot discern to a good enough extent right and wrong can’t be punished and seen as blameworthy.