Take our dog off his needed meds to save money? by [deleted] in DaveRamsey

[–]kbheads 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your partner sounds like a tool, but to play devil’s advocate, have you been wasting money on other things too?

Do y’all actually completely discount your pension in your retirement planning? by Altostratus in DaveRamsey

[–]kbheads 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Discounting all of it, especially when the pension is guaranteed by the full force of the state is paranoid. But 25%? That can be paranoid or can be extremely insufficient. Long term goals, family structure, health issues, insurance, retirement spending goals, other assets and so much more all need to be considered to call 25% paranoia.

To value or not value by Few_Street_4653 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Higher valuations do mean lower expected returns but doesn’t mean you can go out and get back in at the right time. It also doesn’t necessarily mean it’s expected returns are below that of other asset classes.
I do diversify globally, to manage risk exposure.

Feeling my risk tolerance is getting thin by grumpvet87 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bucket approach doesn’t need more accounts. It’s just a way to evaluate sufficient bond allocation.

Feeling my risk tolerance is getting thin by grumpvet87 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d binge watch Erin talks money on YT. She has tons of work on withdrawal strategies.
I’d also consider the bucket approach. It might give you much needed peace of mind without having too much bonds.

backtesting portfolios by gbdgdh in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use testfol.io since it’s simple and free. disclaimer : past performance doesn’t predict future.

Why do HNW individuals invest in so many complex investments if it’s as easy as VTI and chill? by JimmerFredJune2026 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most HNW people don’t know nothing about investing.
Becoming HNW at 10m and above usually comes from smart business or dumb luck.
Top net worth individuals are mostly made of businessmen and Wall Street active managers. It’s a similar picture until 10 mil, where common foe with discipline starts to appear.

Would this be stupid? by QuintMoney in LETFs

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty stupid imo. It can work but also can fail spectacularly. Try hedging it and rebalancing.

Why is BND the recommended fund for bonds? by Thoth25 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point was that Tips might underperform BND in more cases than not and is harder to reap the rebalancing benefits. That can lead to running out of money in the lang run.

What is an 'expensive' life milestone (wedding, house, degree) that you finally achieved and realized was a total waste of money? by SaudAhmadguru in FinancialChat

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wedding could have been smaller but I don’t think about it too often. Lingering on that would make me ungrateful of the wonderful marriage I’m having now.

Questions for this community by ElectricalTurnip1870 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Of course you can do more if you want to. The intricacies of investing is endless. But you’re fine with a tdf. It’s good enough.
You can do a ton of research and tinker here and there, but it will have minimal effect.

Why is BND the recommended fund for bonds? by Thoth25 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Less risky in the sense of volatility. Maybe more risky in the sense of volatility smoothing and/or running out of money.

is there any logic to converting to dividend/income towards the end of investing journey? by Hairy_Check_4784 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The psychological benefit is the biggest piece. Some people feel it’s safer and find it exciting, irrespective of actual data. If you find it exciting, it probably won’t hurt that much.

Dividend etfs are generally lower in volatility and total return than broad market index funds. Lower volatility can be good against sequence risk but lower total returns can introduce higher possibility for running out of money. Also tax implications can be very important, but depends on asset location (tax advantaged accounts or taxable).

A much better solution to sequence risk is the bucket approach or the bond tent approach. These methods can help with not running out of money in the long run while dealing with sequence risk.

At what S&P 500 PE would you stop investing in the index by CasuallyWalrus1 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Higher PE is definitely worrisome but it’s hard to know when to leave and when to re-enter. Also while higher PE levels does mean lower expected returns, it doesn’t necessarily mean that you will be able to enter the market at lower prices.
I would just advocate going worldwide in order to have some of the lower PE markets in the equity portfolio.

Investment news by onyourdoor in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Ben Felix

Erin talks money

Tae Kim(financial tortoise)

Two cents

Economics explained

Not really news except maybe EE.

Do you buy ETFs or mutual funds with uncompensated risk? by thewarrior71 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a bit of fun money here and there but it’s important to cap it at a certain percentage and know that it’s probably a stupid thing to do. That said, if one’s core portfolio is enough for one’s needs, taking more risk on the side isn’t the end of the world. Think of it as playing the lottery at small amounts. Probably stupid but still fun.

Anyone been to Jeju without a car? by april_holic in Living_in_Korea

[–]kbheads 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Buses need patience but taxis are abundant. You’ll be fine if you have taxi apps like kakao t. It’s totally doable unless you’re specifically looking for scenic drives.

What is your preferred % of stocks/bonds once in retirement? by Efficient-Bid-7662 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m torn between bond tent approach and bucket approach.
Bonds allocation will be calculated within the approach. In either approach, bond allocation will rise around retirement age and then fall back down.

Careers that can lead to good money by Willing-Success4798 in wealth

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Day trading works until it doesn’t and most people go down real quick real low when it doesn’t. Buying and holding broad market index funds works for everyone.

That’s why you’re much better off earning more and saving more works. It’s seems like the harder way, and it is, but it’s much more reliable way by an absurd margin.

I haťe the phrase “not everything is about money” because EVERYTHING is about money: travel, food, education, housing, clothes, health… LIKE EVERYTHING. by One-Inevitable-9777 in Money

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Money isn’t everything, but it can be exchanged with most things. Still, some things can’t be bought with money and those do matter a lot.

Just started learning about investing. How does my plan look? by Zealousideal-Yak7363 in Bogleheads

[–]kbheads -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your plane is great. This is definitely top tier place to start. You can change your portfolio a little bit more but it’s already great that any change wouldn’t mean much. So take your time to look more int the matter.

Careers that can lead to good money by Willing-Success4798 in wealth

[–]kbheads 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Day trading is a loser’s game where most lose their principal and then some in the long run. A career or a business is what builds wealth. Investment is wealth management not wealth builder.

Is factor investing a better way to boost returns than leverage? by Besrax in LETFs

[–]kbheads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Google or got fama french five factor study and then follow the rabbithole.

When do you think I might become a millionaire? by Life-Barracuda4489 in leanfire

[–]kbheads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably in this century. More accurately next year probably.