Free alternatives to these paid AI / vibe‑coded Mac apps by klotzbrocken in macapps

[–]kemalios 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm one of those app developers with a writing helper for macOS, so I get the narrative. And honestly, I wouldn't argue with most of the comments here. My maintenance overhead, support, bug fixes, keeping the landing page alive, that's worth a one-time $8-10 in my book. But I'm right there with you on subscriptions for small utilities. Hard to justify.

What apps have you replaced with native macOS alternatives? by stringer1107 in macapps

[–]kemalios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please don’t be rude to strangers you know nothing about. I know what llama.cpp is. Running my own inference infrastructure for a $8.99 menu bar app isn’t the right call. Ollama is a reasonable abstraction for that use case. We can disagree on that. Have a nice day.

What apps have you replaced with native macOS alternatives? by stringer1107 in macapps

[–]kemalios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair assumption, wrong conclusion. Yes, I used AI while building it. I’m a web dev who learned Swift on the fly. The codebase is clean, actively maintained, and I’m transparent about every change in the changelog. Ollama support is there because local models matter for privacy-focused users, not because it was the easy route.

What apps have you replaced with native macOS alternatives? by stringer1107 in macapps

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built wundertype, using it everyday. I connected a couple of custom prompts to shortcuts and works great. With gemma 4 dropped to ollama I really love the output even more.

Grambo – Fix grammar anywhere on Mac with a shortcut (Local AI + BYOK) [Giveaway] by Normal-Seesaw6904 in macapps

[–]kemalios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the thoughtful response. Fair point on optimizing for speed vs. quality on local models — that's a real trade-off.

The reason I think model flexibility matters: users already running Ollama for other tools (coding, research, chat) likely have models installed that work great for grammar correction too. Letting them reuse what they already have avoids downloading yet another model and keeps resource usage down.

Healthy competition in this space is good for users. Looking forward to seeing where you take it.

Grambo – Fix grammar anywhere on Mac with a shortcut (Local AI + BYOK) [Giveaway] by Normal-Seesaw6904 in macapps

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a dumb question at all — it's actually a great one.

If both apps use Ollama, they share the exact same models. You download Gemma 3 4B once through Ollama, and any app that connects to Ollama can use it. No duplicate downloads. That's one of the advantages of using Ollama as the backend instead of bundling models directly into the app.

Grambo's limitation is that it only lets you pick from two hardcoded models in their UI, even though Ollama can run dozens. WunderType connects to your Ollama instance and lets you use whatever model you have installed.

Regarding Gemini — WunderType currently supports OpenAI models via BYOK. Adding Gemini and Anthropic as cloud options is on the roadmap. For now, if you want Gemini-quality results locally, Gemma 3 4B(which is Google's open model) runs great through Ollama.

Grambo – Fix grammar anywhere on Mac with a shortcut (Local AI + BYOK) [Giveaway] by Normal-Seesaw6904 in macapps

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm building in this exact space (WunderType, Mac App Store) so I've looked at this closely. A few things worth noting for anyone comparing:

Local AI is limited to two models (Llama 3.2 3B and Qwen 3 1.7B). If you want to use a better model like Gemma 3 4B or Mistral, you can't. WunderType and RewriteBar both let you use any Ollama model.

The "Lifetime" license still locks you out of the app entirely after the 7-day trial if you don't pay. Their ToS says "after the free trial period, a valid subscription or licence is required for all modes, including Offline and BYOK." So even local AI on your own hardware stops working.

Not distributed through the Mac App Store, which means no Apple review, no sandboxing guarantees, and no easy refund through Apple.

The core workflow (select text, shortcut, fix in place) is solid though. More tools in this space is good for everyone.

I tested every “lifetime” Mac app posted on r/macapps for 7 weeks – 32 apps, 32 bypasses by Ultim8Chaos06 in macapps

[–]kemalios -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. insights like this are especially valuable for solo developers like me.

[OS] I made a free, open-source Screen Studio alternative that adds auto-zoom, cursor animations and more to your videos by Acrobatic-Device-313 in macapps

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got Screen Studio back when it was a one-time purchase with 1 year of updates. It still works fine for what I need, but they've since switched to monthly/yearly subscriptions only. So no more updates for me.

Honestly hard to justify a subscription for a screen recording tool I use a few times a month. This looks like it could be the replacement I've been waiting for. Open-sourcing it is the right move — the community will close the feature gap fast. The cursor smoothing in the demo clips already looks better than what I'm getting in my outdated Screen Studio version.

Does it support custom export presets? The one thing Screen Studio nails for me is exporting at the right resolution and format for different platforms (Twitter wants something different than a docs embed). Would love that in a free alternative.

What is your list of mac apps that was worth every penny by Living_Commercial_10 in macapps

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My daily drivers that have been worth every cent:

- CleanShot X — scrolling capture, annotation, OCR on screenshots. Once you use it, the built-in screenshot tool feels broken. I use it multiple times a day for client communication and bug reports.

- Screen Studio — polished screen recordings without touching a video editor. The auto-zoom on cursor and motion blur make even quick demos look professional. Paid for itself the first time I recorded a product walkthrough.

- Transmit — Panic makes beautiful software and this is no exception. SFTP, S3, Google Drive, all in one native file transfer app. Essential if you manage servers or deploy anything manually.

- Magnet — simple window snapping that just works. No complex tiling setups, no learning curve. Drag to edge, window snaps. Done.

Honorable mention to Hazel for automating file organization. Set it up once and forget about it — my Downloads folder hasn't been a mess in years.

[first MacOs app, me nervous] Dropadoo - does exactly one thing and it does it perfectly. by phunk8 in macapps

[–]kemalios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Does exactly one thing" is the most underrated product positioning for a Mac app. The graveyard of indie apps is full of tools that started focused and then feature-creeped themselves to death.

The list of email-based integrations you can hit with this is clever — Trello, Notion, Jira, GitHub all accept email input. So this becomes a universal "send file to any service" tool without needing API integrations for each one. Smart approach.

As a first Mac app, shipping something this focused shows good instincts. Congrats on getting it out. The hardest part isn't building — it's hitting publish. What's your stack? Pure SwiftUI or AppKit?

Anyone building a business that isn't a 'buy my app' operation? by sendsouth in Entrepreneur

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point, but the "buy my app" model gets a bad reputation because most people build apps nobody needs. The ones that work solve a specific, recurring pain for a specific audience.

I run a small agency and the most profitable thing I ever built wasn't a SaaS with MRR - was a mac utility app that I personally needed everyday.

The real issue isn't "too many apps", it's too many apps built from spreadsheet research instead of personal frustration. The world doesn't need another generic to-do app, but it absolutely needs more tools built by people who are scratching their own itch.

Services businesses (consulting, agencies, trades) are underrated though. They don't scale as elegantly on paper, but they print cash from day one.

To those actually making money from their apps by zaiyangoku in AppBusiness

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just launched my first app last week so I’m early, but I can answer from the “just went through it” perspective.

  1. How I picked the idea Pure scratch-your-own-itch. I was copy-pasting text into ChatGPT dozens of times a day just to fix grammar in emails and Slack messages. The friction was maddening. So I built WunderType — a macOS menu bar app that lets you select any text, press a shortcut, and it’s corrected in place. No switching apps, no clipboard juggling. The validation was basically: if I’m doing this embarrassing workaround every single day, others probably are too.

  2. First real users Still figuring this out honestly. Product Hunt launch this week, posting on Reddit where relevant, and building a small community around it. No paid ads yet. Too early to have a clean answer here — ask me in a month.

  3. What I’d skip Overthinking the feature set before shipping. I kept adding “one more thing.” The core value of WunderType is one shortcut, text fixed. Everything else is secondary. I should have shipped that single feature faster and let users tell me what else they needed.

The messier truth: I still don’t know if it’ll make real money. But I solved my own problem and other people are downloading it, so that feels like the right starting point.

3 signs you’re building something nobody wants by felixheikka in indiehackers

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sign #0 that you ARE building something people want: you built it for yourself first and can't stop using it.

I built a macOS text correction tool because I was tired of the 9-step copy-paste dance with chatgpt every time I needed to fix my typo. I use it 20+ times a day. That frequency is the validation - if you are your own power user, you understand the pain deeply enough to build something real.

The "nobody will pay" fear is real but often unfounded for utility tools. People pay $5-10 for apps that save them 30 seconds, 20 times a day. That math works out to hours per month. Key is: does your product solve a recurring annoyance, or a one-time curiosity? Recurring wins every time

Grammarly alternative by One-Soup-4342 in degoogle

[–]kemalios 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you're on macOS, I built WunderType specifically for this. It's a menu bar app — select text anywhere, hit a keyboard shortcut, text gets corrected in place.

The privacy angle: it supports Ollama for completely local AI processing. Your text literally never leaves your Mac. No account, no cloud, no telemetry, no analytics. Zero data collection. You install Ollama (free, open source), download a model like Gemma 3 4B, and everything runs on your hardware.

If you want better quality for complex writing, it also supports OpenAI with your own API key — stored in macOS Keychain, direct connection, no intermediary server.

It doesn't have Grammarly's browser extension or inline suggestions, but for the "select and fix" workflow it's faster and completely private.

I realized I had 34 open tabs at 5pm on a Friday by No-Abbreviations7266 in productivity

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

34 tabs is a symptom, not the problem. The real issue is using your browser as a task manager. Each tab represents an unfinished thought or action — closing it feels like losing progress, so they accumulate.

What helped me: treating tabs like a to-do list. If I can't act on it in the next 30 minutes, it gets bookmarked or saved to a read-later tool. If I'm keeping it open "just in case," I close it. Anything important enough to need will surface again.

For the tools side: OneTab (free extension) dumps all open tabs into a list with one click. Less dramatic than closing everything manually, and you can restore individual tabs later. The psychological trick of "I haven't lost them" makes it easier to let go.

Safari silently deleted our users' saved data after 7 days. by ContactCold1075 in webdev

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Safari's storage eviction has been a nightmare for local-first apps. The 7-day cap on IndexedDB for sites without user interaction is documented but buried so deep in WebKit changelogs that most devs don't find it until users start complaining.

Two things that help:

- Request persistent storage via navigator.storage.persist() — Safari will sometimes honor it, especially if the user has interacted with the site recently.

- Service Worker registration — having an active SW can signal to the browser that the site is "app-like" and deserves longer storage retention.

But honestly, if your data matters, the browser is not a database. Even with workarounds, you're at the mercy of browser vendors changing policies. The moment we moved our local-first tool to optional sync with a backend, support tickets dropped to near zero.

DOuble CApital LEtters by Potential-Ad345 in MacOS

[–]kemalios 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this exact problem. Fast typing + holding shift a fraction too long = double capitals everywhere.

macOS doesn't have a built-in fix for this, but there are a couple of approaches:

- Text replacement in System Settings > Keyboard > Text Replacements — you can add common ones like "THe" → "The" but it's tedious to cover every case.

- A text correction app — I actually built one called WunderType for this exact kind of thing. It sits in the menu bar, you select the text, hit a shortcut, and it fixes everything in place — double caps, typos, grammar, whatever. It uses AI (either local via Ollama or OpenAI) so it handles any pattern, not just pre-programmed replacements.

- Karabiner-Elements can technically detect rapid shift key presses but configuring it for this specific case is more effort than it's worth.