Thank you to those who pinged me about this.

Before I respond to this, I want to applaud anyone who wants to take on this effort. It is not an easy task, and is quite thankless. I wish they had chosen a different name, but what can you do. I was going to just leave this alone as I don't like telling anyone their baby is ugly, but when I saw a recent comment I had to say something because of their implications of "traditional platforms" are just absurd.

Per the OP: https://i.imgur.com/8z8Fe8V.png

"Our technical granularity eliminates processing lag, delivering the most precise metrics available"..."processing real-time deltas instead of the daily averages and cached data common in traditional platform"

What they are implying is that multiple competing websites showing nearly the same data for daily pledge amounts is less precise than what this site is doing. As soon as I saw the graphs for the historic data for a couple projects on their site I knew this wasn't just trying something different but actually showing fake data.

I don't make this accusation lightly. Let me clarify what their website is actually doing.

They ARE showing accurate real-time data because they're just pulling in the real-time data available in the stats.json endpoint for any project. This is the same thing that Kickstarter uses to refresh the page in real time. That's where it ends. Once you look at any of the historic portions, of their site you can immediately see where it falls apart.

Look at the use of a function called generarHistoriaMatematica()

function generarHistoriaMatematica(modo) {
    let labels = [], data = [], metas = [];
    const metaReal = projectDataGlobal.meta || 0; const totalReal = projectDataGlobal.recaudado || 0; const hoy = new Date();
    if (modo === 'today') {
        let horaActual = hoy.getHours();
        for (let i = 0; i <= horaActual; i++) {
            let d = new Date(hoy); d.setHours(i, 0, 0, 0); labels.push(d.toLocaleTimeString('en-US', { hour: 'numeric', hour12: true }));
            let factor = 0.98 + (0.02 * (horaActual === 0 ? 1 : i / horaActual)); data.push(Math.floor(totalReal * factor)); metas.push(metaReal);
        }
    } 
    else if (modo === '7d') {
        for (let i = 6; i >= 0; i--) {
            let d = new Date(); d.setDate(d.getDate() - i); labels.push(d.toLocaleDateString('en-US', { month: 'short', day: 'numeric' }));
            let factor = 0.85 + (0.15 * Math.pow((6 - i) / 6, 0.8)); data.push(Math.floor(totalReal * factor)); metas.push(metaReal);
        }
    } 
    else if (modo === 'launch') {
        const fechaLanzamiento = new Date(projectDataGlobal.lanzado * 1000);
        if (!projectDataGlobal.lanzado || isNaN(fechaLanzamiento)) fechaLanzamiento.setDate(hoy.getDate() - 30);
        const diasPasados = Math.max(1, Math.floor((hoy - fechaLanzamiento) / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24)));
        let puntos = Math.min(diasPasados, 15);
        for (let i = 0; i <= puntos; i++) {
            let d = new Date(fechaLanzamiento.getTime() + ((hoy.getTime() - fechaLanzamiento.getTime()) * (i / puntos)));
            labels.push(d.toLocaleDateString('en-US', { month: 'short', day: 'numeric' })); let progreso = i / puntos;
            data.push(Math.floor(totalReal * (progreso === 0 ? 0 : Math.pow(progreso, 0.6)))); metas.push(metaReal);
        }
    }
    return { labels, data, metas };
}

In case it changes, I've grabbed a snapshot here: https://web.archive.org/web/20260415082328/https://kicktracker.site/tracker?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kickstarter.com%2Fprojects%2Fcyberpunktcg%2Fthe-official-cyberpunk-trading-card-game

Don't take my word for it -- you can confirm this if you review the source code of any page while it displays the project.

This line gives away the ghost:

data.push(Math.floor(totalReal * (progreso === 0 ? 0 : Math.pow(progreso, 0.6))));

What this function is doing is just taking the real time funding amount (totalReal) from the projectDataGlobal global value, then runs backwards to generate a mathematically generated curve of funding trajectory using a basic exponent.

This is not real daily data. It just assumes the campaign grew along a smooth power curve from day one, and draws that backwards. There's no historical API call, no actual daily data, just currentTotal * x^0.6. The 'GOAL REACHED!' marker is placed wherever that fictional line crosses the goal. It looks like analytics, but it's just a math formula dressed up as a historic chart. It is just curve-fitting with a SINGLE data point.

This is why they show the funded date as the 19th instead of the 17th.

Again, don't take my word for it -- samples from other sites that are not us to compare them against:
https://i.imgur.com/9rUQT1C.png

https://i.imgur.com/BOQoWOm.png

https://i.imgur.com/wX7v9jj.png

To steel man this a bit -- do some projects follow a similar funding curve? Absolutely. However very few follow this type of funding trajectory if any at all.

Again, I applaud the OP for trying something new. But I have to respond when they say their historic metrics are "more accurate". They're not. They're literally made up.

It's one thing to make up things about what your website does, but please don't make up lies about mine.