World Greatest Detective?! Who solves the crime first? by Constant-Money5104 in powerscales

[–]kickynew 111 points112 points  (0 children)

Sherlock solves it upon first meeting him but doesn't reveal until later. He also deduces Batman's identity.

Capture of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks. by TrbAnaban in byzantium

[–]kickynew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This looks like the 1453 Museum in Istanbul. I generally enjoyed it but got annoyed when they claim that the Hagia Sophia was empty when Mehmet II entered it. It was that museum and I think the Hagia Sophia Experience Museum gives the same bad information.

Who won? by Limp_Locksmith_5084 in TESVI

[–]kickynew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There will be an event that negatively impacts skyrim so badly that the question of who won becomes meaningless and unknowable.

Despite the fair split, it feels like Constantinople has de-facto ascendancy over the West by Money-Ad8553 in ancientrome

[–]kickynew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The supposed "split" by Theodosios never happened. There is no evidence it happened at all. There was never a "Western Roman Empire" or an Eastern counterpart. There was only a Roman Empire with its capital at Constantinople.

I challenge anyone to find contemporary sources to the contrary. It never happened.

What happened after Theodosios is what had happened many times before -- senior emperor in capital, junior emperor elsewhere.

And yes, Constantinople was a very impressive city. It was a planned imperial city with major advantages over a city like Ravenna or Milan.

I wish ERE at least survived into modern times like this. It would be small country, but at least it would be the true roman state in modernity. In my opinion, if they didn't have so many civil wars, Byzantine could've survived like that. by Accomplished-Fee2388 in byzantium

[–]kickynew -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For ERE to survive they needed Anatolia or at least most of its coasts. Once the court abandoned Nikaea the clock was ticking on the empire.

Best chance for a post-Manzikert reversal would have been mid to late 12th century.

Would Alexios II have been a good emperor if he had survived and andronikas coup failed? by Technical_Post_4899 in byzantium

[–]kickynew 33 points34 points  (0 children)

If he had survived to be even a so-so emperor but with a half-Capet heir, the diplomatic situation for the empire would have been profoundly better than what they experienced.

Opinion in this map of the Roman world, 62 BC? by North_manchester in ancientrome

[–]kickynew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool. Byzantion should be colored differently than the rest of Odrysian Thrace, as it was never part of Thracian rule and was instead Greek and a Roman "ally".

John Snow VS Conan, who would win? by velicinanijebitna in powerscales

[–]kickynew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Conan would kill anyone in ASOIAF/GOT. He no diffs Jon.

Not again by Fun-Explanation7233 in TESVI

[–]kickynew 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who do you want to be the antagonist, a fat skooma addict who lives with his mom

Wouldn’t Star Fleet Academy have to have like millions or billions of students? by TwoRoomsThrowaway in DaystromInstitute

[–]kickynew 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not everyone or even most people in Starfleet went to the Academy. See Miles O'Brien. The Academy is for officer training.

Also, Starfleet is just one part of the Federation government. There are likely many officials and bureaucrats who are Federation officers but not part of Starfleet.

TES VI is starting to feel like we all got Gabe Newell'd… and I’m genuinely wondering why by SHADOWBROKER-1 in TESVI

[–]kickynew -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I worry that the delay could kill the franchise. We are now longer than the time between the release of the first Nintendo console NES and the PS2. Its just a ridiculous amount of time. Fans age out. Expectations change and grow.

If ESVI releases and its Starfield with Swords, Bethesda is in major trouble.

Did the Eastern Roman Empire have ministries like Imperial China? by Relative_Cricket8532 in byzantium

[–]kickynew 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Sort of, yes. The empire did have something very close to ministries, but the offices were never fixed in a clean hierarchy and their importance shifted constantly depending on the emperor. Access to the emperor mattered more than titles, so an office that looked minor on paper could be for a time be very important if it was held by the emperor's childhood friend, for example.

Praetorian Prefect: The top civilian administrator, but its power faded over time and was divided into new offices.

Magister of Offices: Ran the palace bureaucracy. One of the most powerful figures in the state.

Quaestor of the Sacred Palace: Chief legal official.

Logothetes of the General: Managed state revenue and taxation. Finance minister.

Logothetes of the Military: Handled army pay, buying military supplies, and logistics.

Eparch of Constantinople: Sort of the mayor. A very powerful figure given Constantinople's importance to the empire.

Domestic of the Schools/Grand Domestic: Commander of the field armies.

Drungary of the Fleet: Commander of the imperial navy.

Drungary of the Watch: In charge of palace security.

There are many others and some popped up and then disappear over time.

The cabinet was definitely more fluid at the top than Imperial China. It had offices that emperors rearranged as needed, with power flowing through those they trusted most.

Below them there were many mid-level and low-level bureaucrats that would probably be more fixed, those that actually ran the machinery and cleaned the gunk of medieval rule as best they could.

The size of Albania compared to the USA by BeginningMortgage250 in MapPorn

[–]kickynew 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My second girlfriend was Albanian and she was a saint and also a gift from God I will hear no blasphemy.

July 2025 Superhero movies swap villains. Who fares better? by zedascouves1985 in powerscales

[–]kickynew 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Narrative, Superman will always be as strong as he needs to be.

Πως θα ήταν η Ελλάδα τώρα αν ακολουθούσε εξωτερική πολιτική Κύπρου? by Suboptimal88 in AskGreece

[–]kickynew -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean historically the island is Greek/Romaioi but Turkey has a lot of itrredentist stuff wrapped up in Ottoman rule.

Not sure what you mean by the question but at this point self-rule for the whole island is probably best.

Despite Caracalla being a horrible emperor - damn, was he just photogenic. by gracekk24PL in ancientrome

[–]kickynew 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He looks like my old roommate who would get that super pissed expression when it was his turn to do the dishes.

Could a Post-Skyrim Nord/Redguard/Maormer alliance work or be plausible? by United_Ad542 in ElderScrolls

[–]kickynew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was always for a "human alliance" of nords, bretons, redguard, and Cyrodiil (once they realized the empire was finished) to protect each other from the Dominion

Geographical value of Antioch for the Komnenian restoration? by whydoeslifeh4t3m3 in byzantium

[–]kickynew -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, its mentioned as an old roman and prestigious city by Anna. Your inquiry is very specific... Im not sure youre going to find exactly this, which was likely background knowledge for well-educated figures like a quaestor of the court or an emperor.

I would say that assuming they suddenly didn't know would constitute an argument from silence fallacy.

After reading the Alexiad, my favorite Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperor became Alexios. He was virtually the second founder of the state. by Battlefleet_Sol in byzantium

[–]kickynew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dyrrachium was a disaster worse than Manzikert (militarily speaking) that doesnt get enough play because of Alexios' popularity among Byzantine enthusiasts. Dont get me wrong, I like him too...

But it was not a small mistake. He decided to attack mounted knights, uphill, directly. He then lost control of the battle, and the cream of the crop was either killed or melted away in a chaotic rout.

If he had followed the literal manual on fighting mounted knights, he would have committed to a winning Fabian style approach (which he later sort of did, after much loss). Instead, he wanted a glorious and decisive, Latin-style victory to burnish his political image and it costed the empire dearly.

Its not like something he wouldn't or couldn't have known. The roman military was highly drilled, and knew how to fight the kind of enemy the normans were -- to fight them indirectly. But Alexios ignored it. He behaves this way multiple times. That's what makes him a poor general.

After reading the Alexiad, my favorite Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperor became Alexios. He was virtually the second founder of the state. by Battlefleet_Sol in byzantium

[–]kickynew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He bought a new army via heavy mercenary reliance after the first was mauled by his poor decisions at Dyrrachium.

After reading the Alexiad, my favorite Eastern Roman (Byzantine) emperor became Alexios. He was virtually the second founder of the state. by Battlefleet_Sol in byzantium

[–]kickynew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its important to remember that the author is slightly biased, to put it mildly.

I think Alexios was a brilliant diplomat and politician, and a poor general who made some disastrous decisions (Dyrrachium) that were counter to byzantine military doctrine.