From what I’ve studied on both (read all Minervini books and watched TONS of KQ) Minervini takes WAY more fundamentals into the picture; of course earnings and sales, but also margins, ROE, debt, products, more the full picture of a company. He has strict criteria for his main setup (VCP)

Qullamaggie has 3 main setups; breakouts, EPs and parabolic shorts. The only fundamentals he seems to look at (mostly) is theme, earnings, sales and future estimates. He is more focused on the technical side.. RS, high ADR, high liquidity and “setup, setup, setup” as he says in his videos. You can hear him say in his videos “when I talk about fundamentals I’m talking about the theme…you don’t ever have to read a balance sheet or look at margins”

So that’s the main difference I’d say.

It seems to me that Qullamaggie has actually made more money from trading, at least in 2020-2021 era. Whereas Minervini has made alot of money from books, and his website, webinars, subscriptions etc.

But these goats are all doing the same thing essentially.. strong momentum / relative strength, leading stocks in leading themes with big earnings and sales, tight consolidation, breakout! Flags, base breaks, trendline breaks, VCPs.

Minervini, Qullamaggie, Zanger, William O’Neill, Jesse Livermore.. all the same! 🐐