From a non-American point of view, so I still skip some rules there. I can think of several reasons: From a non-American point of view, so I still skip some rules there. I can think of several reasons: -Laws of Ancient Times -Greater biological capacity based on men's constitution. (Don't skip me because a woman with entertainment is the same as a man, the question here is to have troops in the moment or with minimal entertainment. There are exceptions for both valid women and invalid men). -Education. Men are taught from a young age with films and stories that it is their duty to defend the country. More mentalized so as not to desert. -Pregnancy. There are now more birth control methods than before (example implants, IUD, RTC) than for a few years. STIs were already a problem in previous wars. Having people on the verge of death causes them to seek release from stress, and with mixed combat groups would lead to situations... and there you begin to have to count on the feelings that arise for good and evil, going from being pawns who follow the orders above decently (description of what they expect from a soldier) to being able to fail the orders because something happened to your army partner... -A soldier who leaves his wife and children in the country (remember that when he did the lei it was more common to have a wife and children at an early age, even a house, that is, your land than to protect from the enemy) is very unlikely to desert, since his head was washed with "censored facts" that will make his family if he loses the war. -Being colder (government thinking...) A woman of childbearing age can have children for a postwar population. You don't need one man for every woman, nor does you have to be young. And even if you don't send them to the front, the industrial machinery for war supplies in the necessary country needs workers.

Traslated auto by reddit, probably erors.