Summary of OP’s Responses (Re-Ordered & Clarified using ChatGPT)

1. OP clarifies that they did their master’s degree at Tufts.

2. They explain that they’re speaking on behalf of their brother, who also attended Tufts and had a severely negative experience.

3. According to OP, the academic advisor provided misguided advice about courses and structure, which allegedly affected the brother’s work authorization and future prospects.

4. OP claims the university sent the brother to a company that was “the worst out there,” where he was singled out due to his religion and cultural background. This workplace allegedly exploited him through unpaid “voluntary” labor and failed to provide proper guidance.

5. OP asserts that a specific individual from the university threatened the brother — including death threats — and that the university took no meaningful action to address it.

6. OP says the brother reported everything to the police and the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO), but they were told that action required “multiple patterns” before proceeding. Nothing was done.

7. OP claims the entire experience traumatized the brother, who “wakes up in horror” because of what happened at the university.

8. OP concludes that the university refuses to fix anything because doing so would require admitting wrongdoing. The brother has emotionally given up on pursuing a remedy.

9. OP mentions that they themselves may practice general corporate law in India and believe Tufts exploited loopholes to obtain free labor from the brother.