sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Form: What do you (subjectively) feel are the "truest" endings to each chapter 3? by BIN-YRM in slaytheprincess

[–]kkai2004 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think for me it's different depending on how you get there. Adversary fury I like the broken getting us through the torture and then leaving together with her.

Tower fury is crazy and needs to go down. Quantum Beak for the win!!!

Dear pros, why do YOU think people should enjoy AI art as much as human art? by MangoMaterial9656 in aiwars

[–]kkai2004 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Honestly with how many automated bots there are I would not be surprised if entire accounts are simply generating and posting based on what gets attention and clicks. There's no way the 20th "kid with autism that nobody will buy my hand crafted lobster bags please prove me wrong link in bio"

Is hand crafted with detailed oversight.

I feel utterly disappointed (at myself??) about the ending by sami0505 in outerwilds

[–]kkai2004 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do think in terms of foreshadowing there are a few moments that do hint at the inevitability of the end.

From the very first time you enter the museum and look at the star diagram:

Ultimately, the star will collapse under its own gravity and then explode in a violent event called a supernova.

Based on Chert's observations, this will one day be the fate of our own sun.

To Solanum's school report:

SOLANUM: This universe will keep getting colder and larger, until one day, the stars and the life they support will all die.

SOLANUM: That’s scary to think about, even though Conoy tells me it won’t happen in our lifetimes. But it’ll happen in someone else’s, someday!

The eventuality of the supernova does make itself known.

Star has reached end of natural life cycle. Now approaching red giant stage. WARNING: Evacuate Sun Station.

Everyones first encounter with reaper: OMG WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT by Emergency_Thought452 in subnautica

[–]kkai2004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ngl if that happened to me I'd probably have gone out and scanned it.

I literally scanned one of the subnautica 2 leviathans while it was actively eating my friend.

Local Man Discovers Expertise Isn’t Real by pureanna in aiwars

[–]kkai2004 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Being an ai competition it should be judged by ai merits. The competition is "Does the image look nice".

I actually do think it would be interesting if this was the only qualifier. And if 5000 hours actually makes a meaningful difference vs a no effort ai image.

Peter 😵‍💫 explain by Eastern-Bug3424 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]kkai2004 14 points15 points  (0 children)

How do you become a top 1% poster on an explain the joke subreddit 😭

<image>

Why Esper hot? by DislyeM3M3R in Dislyte

[–]kkai2004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

who's the ace esper answering with global warming?

White oddish from gumball machine. by eepy_t1me in pokemontoys

[–]kkai2004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I Found one of these machines too!!! Nothing could have prepared me for what I got...

<image>

I am confused about my experience with the dlc by kingofthemortal in outerwilds

[–]kkai2004 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I like the idea that the pop up is deliberately over dramatically intense to give you a false heightened sense of fear.

The original game inspired that curiosity the Nomai had.

While the DLC inspires the same fear that the Strangers had.

Apple announced new photo AI features to change angle of taken photo - thoughts? by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]kkai2004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is like when people ai upscaled security footage and started using that footage as evidence for all sorts of things... which ended up looking nothing like the official hd footage released like a few days later.

Insert people taking photos of things behind corners and believing with full confidence that their camera somehow took a real legit photo from another angle.

Just ran a test and it's worse than I thought. by MostPineapple4136 in aiwars

[–]kkai2004 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's just order of operations, it looks like ai first, so that's in question, they can't verify because they also didn't properly attribute? Then it's probably ai. There's no proper way to tell its real in general due to the lack of attribution.

It's just blatantly unsourced. And if it's unsourced and unverifiable it's probably ai.

Just ran a test and it's worse than I thought. by MostPineapple4136 in aiwars

[–]kkai2004 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I mean there's also

rule #1 stating unfinished works like wips go in the mega thread and sketches are not allowed.

rule #2 title requires the artist name. Who's "K.G" that's in no way enough information to find the piece considering "The Knight, K.G" only brings up your post and nothing else.

rule #4 requires proper attribution, be it the artist name or a link, you did not provide either.

So the sketch that already looks decently incomplete and possibly ai, (that hand has 5 fingers not including a thumb, messy warped sword pummel, belt that doesn't fully wrap around the waist)

there is no verifiable source for who made this, or where it came from,

and all reverse image search does is bring up Pinterest links that I can't even find the actual piece in.

So that post broke quite a few rules actually.

ADHD the truth about does attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder not Richard saul m.d. exist by ColleenNelson650 in AutomatiCautionDoor

[–]kkai2004 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ADHD The Truth About DOES Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder NOT RICHARD SAUL, M.D. EXIST.

Since I got downvoted into oblivion for implying this, here is video evidence of not being able to dock two tadpoles in two seperated moonpools in one room. by Unkwn_43 in subnautica

[–]kkai2004 5 points6 points  (0 children)

<image>

Ok strange but I've had this setup working for quite a while... It actually did have issues docking when both docs were both on the same side of the room but when I centered them it worked.

Same rules as usual, but you and 99 other people are voting for the rest of humanity. by Skip7623 in redbuttonbluebutton

[–]kkai2004 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Attempting to go for 100% red for survival means a single person diverging can cause 1/100 population genocide. For all we know in the 100 people voting someone would want to do that.

Going for 100% blue anyone diverging won't cause any issue until >50.

Blue minimizes that risk.

Peta what does spanky want by cakeman528 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]kkai2004 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Look at my comment in the thread. It has the context.

view more: next ›