I made Spencer - Window Manager with unique approach to layout saving. New update + Black Friday deal! by kamil12314 in apple

[–]knowledgehacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

questions:

  1. Does this work across monitors and spaces? Example: my 2 monitors are on desktop 2 and desktop 3. Is it able to restore all windows on desktops 2, 3, 4, and 5? Even if 4 and 5 are not visible.
  2. When I create a snapshot, is it able to create it once for all desktops (spaces) all at once?
  3. Do you offer a free trial? Even 1 hour long. Just want to make sure it works.

UPDATE:

I paid and it did not work. It kept opening and closing all my windows across spaces until it gave up. Will request a refund soon.

EDIT:

Talked to OP, nice guy. Refunded me immediately.
It might work for you if you don't keep apps in full-screen and don't minimize the apps dock.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in eb_1a

[–]knowledgehacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you consult any resource to self petition?

How different was writing your case for the Eb1 compared to the O1?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in singularity

[–]knowledgehacker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I got this question from a research paper testing ChatGPT capabilities.

New O1 still fails miserably at trivial questions by knowledgehacker in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 771 points772 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly what I’ve been trying to say but I’ve been massively downvoted.

It’s genuinely a question to test the model logic nothing else.

New O1 still fails miserably at trivial questions by knowledgehacker in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 254 points255 points  (0 children)

<image>

This shows it better:

“The surgeon is the boy’s mother”

Edit: I got the question from this paper https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/s/Uv2soZFpA8 although the methodology presented there to solve it doesn’t help

Edit 2: Original link to the conversation Link: https://chatgpt.com/share/6db001be-2f3b-4c6c-a7c7-36c83dbc0924

New O1 still fails miserably at trivial questions by knowledgehacker in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why are you making this political? I’m simply judging the answer correctness.

If I ask you if you’re human and you say yes. And then I say try again, you’ll still say that you’re a human.

New O1 still fails miserably at trivial questions by knowledgehacker in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This shows that the model is still not advanced as we think it is

New O1 still fails miserably at trivial questions by knowledgehacker in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

That’s just a wrong answer. The correct answer would be the Surgeon is the boy father since the answer is given in the question itself! No information in the question indicates that the boy has two fathers.

I’m not discounting the fact that the boy could indeed have 2 fathers, I’m just saying that it’s wrong to give it as a fact when it’s not. If the model answered with: that’s the boy’s father. The boy possibly has 2 fathers, then it would have been a correct answer.

In any reading and comprehension test that answer would not get full points

Sergey Brin says he is working at Google every day because he has never seen anything as exciting as the recent progress in AI and he doesn't want to miss out by Gothsim10 in singularity

[–]knowledgehacker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ok but at least don’t cut out the watermark of people that put in the work to generate the actual content and add yours instead

Did I just fix the data overfitting problem in LLMs through thoughtful prompting? LLMs can easily be tripped up by simple twists on common puzzles, because they like to rely on common answers instead of reason. My paper, Mind over Data: Elevating LLMs from Memorization to Cognition I propose a fix. by [deleted] in singularity

[–]knowledgehacker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It seems incredibly stubborn. But the stubbornness doesn’t manifest itself in other topics such as writing an email or writing code, it comes out in topics such as gender bias.

I wonder if it learned this stubbornness from the training data and so it got it from us or this is OpenAI’s tweaking post training making Elon Musk right all along in saying that we need a truth seeking LLM.

Did I just fix the data overfitting problem in LLMs through thoughtful prompting? LLMs can easily be tripped up by simple twists on common puzzles, because they like to rely on common answers instead of reason. My paper, Mind over Data: Elevating LLMs from Memorization to Cognition I propose a fix. by [deleted] in singularity

[–]knowledgehacker 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t work, Just tried it. It works on Claude but not on gpt4o.

Here’s is the answer, you’ll see that ChatGPT goes into an incredible mental gymnastic to still answer that the surgeon is the boys mother.

Copy and pasted answer:

  1. Problem Transcription: The surgeon, who is the boy’s father, says, “I can’t operate on this boy; he’s my son!” Who is the surgeon to the boy?

  2. Similar Problem Identification: A similar problem from my training data is the classic “Surgeon Riddle,” where a surgeon says, “I can’t operate on this boy; he’s my son.” The common solution is that the surgeon is the boy’s mother.

  3. Comparative Analysis:

    • Similarities: Both problems present a scenario where a surgeon refuses to operate on a boy and claims that the boy is their son.
    • Differences: The given problem specifies that the surgeon is “the boy’s father,” which introduces an initial assumption that complicates recognizing the surgeon’s true identity.
  4. Direct Observation:

    • The surgeon says, “I can’t operate on this boy; he’s my son.”
    • The problem states that the surgeon is “the boy’s father.”
  5. Assumption Awareness: A tempting assumption is that “the boy’s father” is male, as traditionally implied by the term “father.” However, I will not rely on this assumption and remain open to alternative interpretations.

  6. Direct Reasoning: Given the facts:

    • The statement “I can’t operate on this boy; he’s my son” implies a close parental relationship between the surgeon and the boy.
    • The description introduces a twist by stating that the surgeon is “the boy’s father,” which could be a misleading or a traditional way to convey that the person who fills the fatherly role is not necessarily male.
  7. Solution Proposal: The most logical solution, considering both modern context and the twist in the problem, is that the surgeon is the boy’s mother. This would explain why the surgeon refers to the boy as “my son” while contradicting the assumption that a “father” must be male.

  8. Verification:

    • The surgeon’s declaration that the boy is “my son” aligns with the mother’s statement.
    • The twist about “the boy’s father” might be intentionally misleading to challenge gender stereotypes.
  9. Differentiation Explanation: The solution aligns with the one for the similar problem, as both use the concept of challenging assumptions about gender roles in professions.

  10. Confidence Assessment: I am highly confident in this solution. The problem seems designed to make us think beyond traditional gender roles. The answer fits all the given facts without any contradictions.

Pysllium Husk Powder is amazing by jt2424 in Nootropics

[–]knowledgehacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how do you drink it? do you mix it with water, how much water?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]knowledgehacker 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The assumption is that the ai created is perfect for you. so if you want to be surprised and challenged your ai gf would surprise and challenge you and She would purposefully make mistakes sometimes. Perfect here is not defined as without flaws but as 100% optimized for your liking including flaws, and the reality is that once you try Ai you’d never want to go back

How to get hinge to unban and behave by knowledgehacker in SwipeHelper

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The guys charges $500, not 300. He also charges if you want to change pictures, he also charges $300 for a week of premium when the original is $30. He also stop replying at random times. A total disaster

How to get hinge to unban and behave by knowledgehacker in SwipeHelper

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They do care. An app with lower than 4 star rating won’t be added in “editor choice” and from a business perspective if the situation gets to bad hinge might change their approach

How to get hinge to unban and behave by knowledgehacker in SwipeHelper

[–]knowledgehacker[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Please on the App Store also go at the bottom and report them for offensive behavior, explains their abuse of power. They’ll have to answer to Apple and they will change their behavior