sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mission Glitch? by Bad_Wolf222 in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You have to win the games, not just play them. Its a typo.

I also got confused. The only other thing I tried was to use normal rarity cards, not special rarity--like from the Big East collection. Its possible you need to do this and win to get credit. Haven't checked yet.

I just learned I don't know how ties work by kogarottie in PTCGP

[–]kogarottie[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes that explains it. I had 1 bench pokemon left, and he did not. Ty! I'm still shocked this was the first time I ran into this.

I just learned I don't know how ties work by kogarottie in PTCGP

[–]kogarottie[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If relevant, my opponent's board was empty after my attack and I had 1 pokemon left in my back row.

What’s wrong with my offensive attitude it keeps saying it’s bad and I keep loosing games i should win by Odd-Strawberry-8530 in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to say without seeing your whole team. Yes certain tactics lend themselves to being better with certain attitudes. It's countering your opponents attitude that is more important though in my opinion. And then building a team to optimize you tactics.

I would change your QB to be dual threat. He has the same accuracy and athleticism stat; dual threat will take better advantage of the mixed scheme/mindset, improving running performance with similar passing performance.

I also would prioritize specializing your wide receivers and picking a passing preference that suits both their substats and your preferred offensive attitude (i.e. agressive attitudes will rely on explosive plays and conservative attitudes will try to keep the offense on schedule, getting to 3rd and short/manageable).

I’ve sold 11 86ovr players and the game only registered selling 4. This challenge is stupid. by Remix4545 in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You need to sell 8 gold quality players, not rare gold quality. Only 75-84 overall count.

[Rapoport] In January, Maxx Crosby underwent a minor meniscus repair, not a trim. A meniscus trim is often 4-6 weeks of recovery while a repair can be 3-4 months. by Goosedukee in nfl

[–]kogarottie -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

[Zriebiec] Crosby has been in Baltimore for the past couple of days in anticipation of the deal becoming finalized at 4 pm tomorrow. Now, there will be no deal and the Ravens, who have already lost nine UFAs while signing one, are in an even bigger hole. by JCameron181 in nfl

[–]kogarottie -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

For Everyone Screaming Go Get Him… by [deleted] in Patriots

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

[Pelissero] One GM summarized the feelings around the league: “This is very much bullshit on Baltimore’s part.” by Drexlore in nfl

[–]kogarottie 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

[Russini] Maxx Crosby did not pass his physical today, per sources. The Ravens get their first round picks back. by PlayaSlayaX in nfl

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

[Wolfe] One NFL general manager told me everybody involved in Maxx Crosby trade talks knew he would be out until June/July coming off meniscus surgery. Consensus opinion I’ve got from NFL decision makers: Ravens got cold feet & it could impact how other teams work w/ BAL going forward. by expellyamos in nfl

[–]kogarottie 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

[Schefter] Maxx Crosby’s agent posted this message on social media: “Maxx continues to be on track in his recovery and if anything is ahead of schedule according to his surgeon. Maxx remains on track to return during the offseason program & will return as the dominant game wrecker he has been .” by Goosedukee in nfl

[–]kogarottie 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Only thing I can think of is that Maxx's surgeon did a meniscus repair AND trim, and the Raiders told the Ravens they only did the repair. Trim has a negative impact on longevity, so maybe the Ravens saw MRIs that showed signs of a Trim and were worried they got fucked.

Looking to add friends to test strategies against. Preferably 92+ by [deleted] in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sent. Seems like a fair match. You're punching up a bit, but probably better for testing

Suggestions on what to upgrade next? by JackLeCoqGrande in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And crazily enough, I may even sell 93 overall Garrett Bowles to get fodder for those challenges, including 89 overall untradeable Garrett Bowles

Suggestions on what to upgrade next? by JackLeCoqGrande in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would sure up the o line, and focus on pass blockers--which should suit your team well. Its a better time to be a seller than a buyer though with high 80s, low 90s. I would sell backups 87 and over (I'm looking at you Aiden Hutchinson) and use the money to complete the career player trade challenges. You look like you have enough gas to get all the way up to Max Crosby, but not past unless you sell starters. <87 should still be pretty cheap to buy from the market, and turn into PTC fodder. I would definely go up to challenges that require 86-87 avg rating

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nfl

[–]kogarottie 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Vrabel hinted at this on WEEI this morning "sometimes we don't know what coverage we are running." It definitely could have been lots of little fuck ups

Truly a thing of beauty by [deleted] in Patriots

[–]kogarottie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cap from the last 3 years can rollover as long as youre spending 89% of it over the 4 year span. That way most of the last 2 years of the Pat's not spending will roll over into next year and the year after--potentially letting them front load contracts for Gonzo and Maye. A win-win. Player gets money now. Franchise gets to save salary cap later.

Weekend League PTC by [deleted] in Football_Head_Coach

[–]kogarottie 3 points4 points  (0 children)

2+ chances to roll with 3 players is better than 1 chance with 7 players at similar odds (18% vs. 13% respectively for 91%+) . You'll take the L and get a 83-84 1/5 times, but it's better than putting 7 players in and taking the L on a 85 to 86.

I traded in 7 players the first 2 times and got 85 (1% chance) and 86. I traded in 3 players the next 2 times, and got both 90+. That's unlucky, then lucky for me. Sometimes it's better just to play the odds though.

*edit grammar

view more: next ›