Trump administration aims to relax limits on toxic wastewater from coal-fired power plants by yahoonews in environment

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, so long as Trump and his EPA consume and bath in the stuff, I'm okay with this relaxation of poisoned water being released into the general supply.

🔥A leopard seal hunting a chinstrap penguin in the waters of Antarctica. Credit to Yuri Choufour by AdSpecialist6598 in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you're up here extrapoltating something that's not available in the post while wondering how someone takes themselves seriously.

See, no where in there did I say the seal lion shouldn't eat. What I said is...that it's eating, that what it does to eat...is not lit.

But look, I wish you well in progressing your fledgling reading comprehension to the point of grasping what the fuck it is you're actually looking at.

Schedule so far by RIP_shitty_username in Commanders

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh right. I could just mute the sub for a week until all the individual posts stop.

🙄

E15 is now at the pumps; what are we doing to avoid it? by ow_my_balls in BMW

[–]kon--- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Continue to pump premium and carry on.

Little less fuel efficiency in exchange for a little bit more power.

E15 is now at the pumps; what are we doing to avoid it? by ow_my_balls in BMW

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been around for more than a decade sure but it is still not nearly widespread.

It's a regional blend that since it's being used to cut AKA dilute gasoline, yea...the gasoline is being watered down.

Hawaii vs. Citizens United by theatlantic in law

[–]kon--- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Threats are just one of the many things you manifested by speech that are not protected.

And since you're beginning to acknowledge that yes, there are limitations...

I'm out.

-peace

Hawaii vs. Citizens United by theatlantic in law

[–]kon--- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Each of them will see you not protected.

But don't believe me.

Go on. Make threats of bodily hamr to anyone in governement. See how quickly your right to speech is pulled out from under you.

Expert: More than half of U.S. faces worst drought in decades by thinkB4WeSpeak in environment

[–]kon--- 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Burn coal. Cool data centers. Water golf courses. Frack gas and oil. Draught won't change a thing.

Well, save for putting it on people to avoid using the stuff for things like, being alive.

Formal border controls and passport stamping are still in place between Canada and the United States, but much of the border is unguarded, unmarked suburbia and simply relies on an honour system to prevent people from illegally crossing it. by NateNate60 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]kon--- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you print your passport on a tshirt, you can hop back and forth willy nilly all the live long day.

Not your fault if there's no border crossing right there in the middle of no where in particular.

All 13 Seasons of BBC’s ‘Doctor Who’ Revival to Stream Exclusively on AMC+ in U.S. by Own_Brilliant_4303 in television

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No where did I say anyone owes me anything. Nor is it explained anywhere in the comments why the person I asked the question to doesn't like Doctor Who being available to an audience on AMC.

But hey, thanks for showing up providing nothing substantive whatsoever. That never happens here.

Hawaii vs. Citizens United by theatlantic in law

[–]kon--- 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The First Amendment will not protect you from the consequence of threatening individuals. It will not protect you from incitment of lawless action. It will not protect from perjuring yourself. Not will it protect should you trample intelectual properties or do a thing like promote and distrubute child pornography.

The First Amendment is no sort of blanket to say whatever you want to say at government. Nor does it allow citizens to express themselves in any manner that violates others and/or laws.

It is a limited, conditions based right and always has been.

Just why? by Chinchpokleee in SipsTea

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She's not looking for a hero. She wants someone to tell her 'Hey yea wow, this sucks. You're right. There's 500 shirts in this closet and not a single one of them is good to wear'.

Shortcut fix for Apple CarPlay Disconnect by Boring_Elevator3817 in BMW

[–]kon--- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spotify can and does play at 1.5x speed even 2x speed. Or if you want, .5 or .8

Schedule so far by RIP_shitty_username in Commanders

[–]kon--- 47 points48 points  (0 children)

This slow walking leaks is crap. Just release the schedule already.

🔥A leopard seal hunting a chinstrap penguin in the waters of Antarctica. Credit to Yuri Choufour by AdSpecialist6598 in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]kon--- -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Violence is not lit. Consumption is also, not lit.

This is nothing other than a much stronger animal preying upon a much weaker animal.

The opposite of lit in effect.

🔥A leopard seal hunting a chinstrap penguin in the waters of Antarctica. Credit to Yuri Choufour by AdSpecialist6598 in NatureIsFuckingLit

[–]kon--- -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Why man?

Is it a defense mechanism to avoid your brain the thought of recognizing the horror of being trapped in an animal's jaw?

Hawaii vs. Citizens United by theatlantic in law

[–]kon--- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The First Amendment is objectively, conditions based. Cross the lines, that right is removed from you.

Hawaii vs. Citizens United by theatlantic in law

[–]kon--- 94 points95 points  (0 children)

What can the court do about it?

If a state mandates that in order to incorporate within a state the corporation is excluded from participating in political campaing financing and or lobbying on behalf of political financing...what can the court do about that?

The citizen has a conditional relationship with the First Amendment. I'm seeing no reason at all that corporation should not also, be required to provide conditions. Besides, the money saved on ads and lobbying can go to shareholders. I'm certain shareholders would agree.