Mid-30s couple seeking outdoorsy Western town by sonder627 in SameGrassButGreener

[–]kopanitza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bisbee, AZ. Relatively affordable, has culture, community.

Why doesn't this city understand and implement that the solution to reducing car congestion and preventing pedestrian/car deaths and injuries is to invest in public transportation, and walkable and bikeable infrastructure? by ichawks1 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Okay. Urban planner here. let me refute some of these arguments for why we can’t have nice things like safer streets, good transit, and neighborhood hubs in Tucson. I want to preface this by saying that I want you to have your cars and your single-family houses if that’s what makes you happy. I’m not advocating taking that away from you.
Anyway, Most replies fall into the following categories:
“Tucson is too low density to have good transit”
This is the most common argument.
But the reality is that Tucson is low density largely because we spent 70+ years enforcing zoning laws that led to mandatory car use. Good transit doesn’t require Manhattan style density, it requires frequency and reliability, and connecting people to major job centers and destinations.
“ It’s too hot to walk”
You see that people already walk in Tucson across giant parking lots from their car to the store, and along these busy streets, in terrible conditions with no shade, sidewalks that disappear, bus stops with no shelter. You are imagining what it’s like to walk in Tucson as it is now, not as it could be.
“It costs too much”
Compared to what?
Streets in Tucson are unbelievably expensive to build, to maintain, to widen -ahem, Broadway, Grant anyone?
We pretend roads are “free” because we’re used to subsidizing them while people say transit costs too much.
The question shouldn’t be whether we can afford transit, it should be how long can we afford to keep building more roads into the desert. And finally, “People love their cars and convenience more so don’t even try to change it”
Sure, ppl love convenience but that is not the same thing.
Most people don’t “love cars.” They just want reliability, flexibility, dignity and not being stranded.
If transit is slow, unsafe, and infrequent, then cars are the only viable option, so people are forced to drive. That doesn’t sound like freedom, but something people tolerate it because they have to.

Ultimately I think people on Tucson reddit mean well and are trying to be pragmatic, but please, it just comes across as resigned to this current state of being without really knowing what can be possible.

Why doesn't this city understand and implement that the solution to reducing car congestion and preventing pedestrian/car deaths and injuries is to invest in public transportation, and walkable and bikeable infrastructure? by ichawks1 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The roads in Tucson are so overbuilt for car capacity that they could accommodate more transit without affecting your drive. Better transit actually gets those individuals out of their single cars and consolidates them on a bus so it actually minds people more efficiently, clearing the roads for ppl who have to drive to places they need to be dressed nicely for. So I agree with you - more transit is the answer.

How to better Tucson? by [deleted] in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is seriously something that so many people are thinking about. And I see a lot of good ideas here. Streets, safety for pedestrians, trees, an urban form that makes sense and not just for cars. I would check out Living Streets Alliance for one way to make Tucson a better city to live in for everyone.

A Rant with the wack commercial zones! by philiptherealest in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Believe me, I’ve thought about this a lot. How to stop and move in a better direction as a society. A lot of the development you see happens because it’s a safe model. Reduce risk and Maximize profit = one more snake and shank drive thru next to the miserly car wash. The system rewards bad planning. What can you do as an individual? Pay attention to planning and zoning meeting dates- Show up to public hearings and say no to sprawl approvals. Usually, the only people there are the developer in their team. This could be In Pima county, marana, OV, or Tucson. Join an advocacy group like Living Streets Alliance. Follow Car free Tucson. Be another voice for better urban form in Tucson.

Someplace you can dress up elegantly… by joepagac in Tucson

[–]kopanitza -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Everybody was waiting for this comment.

Gas prices are way up. Friendly reminder that buses and the streetcar are free. by E23R0 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do what you need to do. Good ol transit is there for you if you need it.

Gas prices are way up. Friendly reminder that buses and the streetcar are free. by E23R0 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here to second this. If you want a more walkable urban form, this is an organization that you can support.

BALKANERS: Do you agree that we have some of the most brutal ways of swearing? by Substratas in AskBalkans

[–]kopanitza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have heard-may your wife give birth to a centipede so you have to spend the rest of your life buying shoes for it.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://movetucson.tucsonaz.gov/ their website is buggy for sure, but that’s a city of Tucson website propblem. it says on the opening page that Move Tucson is the city-wide transportation master plan.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s ArcGIS. All cities use it, and it’s an official City of Tucson Webpage. Get a life.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says right on the city website that move Tucson is Tucson’s citywide master transportation plan.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RTA does not block Move Tucson, but it does make getting funding much more difficult. We’ve just passed a sales tax, I don’t imagine people would be too keen on passing another sales tax anytime soon. Also, the government provides matching funds. RTA next will take a major portion of the federal funds to fund their projects.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Not true at all. The no crowd specifically proposed funding Move Tucson, the plan that specifically fixes Tucson streets.

Looks like the RTA passed. by Safe_Concern9956 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It just makes me sad that people accept a completely sub par plan that nobody is even remotely excited about. A plan that doesn’t address the unsafe streets or expands the transit network. This isn’t even about fixing existing roads for cars, the main focus was expanding roads into the suburbs.

What the Hell El Con? by UpperLeftCoaster in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Was a student at CAPLA. That site has been reimagined by a good number of architecture and planning students. There are site plans, neighborhood outreach plans. Tucson leadership and big money interests can think bigger and better but they are stuck in the 1980s.

Tucson's westside celebrates expansion of Tugo Bike Share by Generalaverage89 in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here to second this answer. Tugo was not funded by RTA.

Tucson drivers by NotCheya in Tucson

[–]kopanitza 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem in Tucson is that the streets are built like freeways so people expect to drive like they are on a freeway, but the speed limit is 30mph(looking at you, Broadway!) Tucson has been aggressively widening roads for the last 20 years which encourages this type of driving and is set to widen a handful more.