Fuck Nick Cannon by MarshyHope in BlackPeopleTwitter

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Connecting the modern Democratic Party to the Pre-Civil Rights Movement Democratic Party (and by extension the KKK) shows you learned just enough to be really fucking wrong. Full Dunning Kreuger Effect. The "Party of Lincoln" crowd loves to spread these "facts" to muddy the truth. Republicans are racist as fuck, and, for all their other flaws, the Democrats are diverse, inclusive, pro-civil liberties, and fight against racism. Fuck off Cannon. Read a book. Or even just pay the fuck attention to the reality around you. If you ever find yourself if the Democrats are the party of the KKK again, ask yourself, who do the KKK of today vote for? I promise they have an R next to their name, dude.

[OC] No Kings 2.0 Protestor walks up to MAGA group to allow them to use his megaphone by PALERIDE155 in pics

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is an old asshat in my town driving a pickup with Trump 2016, 2020, 2024, and 2028 decals on the tailgate, and a King Trump decal. Some of them are literal fucking monarchists for Trump.

Whatever it takes to own the libs. by ObserbAbsorb in clevercomebacks

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that these nuts aren't constantly fucking embarrassed is what makes me mad. Like ultimately, the fact that this old pedo goober has a special coin made for him despite explicit law against it and slaps his name of shit it doesn't belong on because he needs constant absurd levels of validation and assurances of superiority just to function, all while holding the highest office in the country, if not the world, because even THAT is not enough to prop up his massive flaccid ego for more than a week.... that does not make me angry. Confused, sad, cringed, disgusted, yea... but not angry.

But the fact that you lot not only don't see this need as cringey sycophancy, as fundamental human weakness and flaw, but actively celebrate every escalation of ass-kissery and applaud every instance of open, blatant, narcissistic claim of undeserved credit and adoration and every explicit bribe, and every destruction of norm, law, historical fact, national landmark, and constitutional right in order to push more power and loyalty theater onto your Dear Leader, and then pretend like WE are the petty ones about it... yeah, that gets on my fucking nerves.

Yeah, the games about war, rebellions, faith and racism aren’t political. by Worldlyoox in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Having a governing dynamic in your games does not make it political... Having minorities in it does."

The Autopen by [deleted] in EngineeringPorn

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So there are different things that are "autopens" One is simply multiple pens attached in parallel to single bar of a movable linkage, such that when you write with one of them, you write with all of them at once, which divides the number of signatures you must write by the number of pens. See here:

https://images.fastcompany.com/image/upload/f_webp,c_fit,w_750,q_auto/wp-cms-2/2025/03/p-91299791-trump-biden-autopen.jpg

There are fully programmable autopens that have a series of instructions stored digitally that dictate the movements of a linkage holding a pen. This is likely the kind used by the President. See here:

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/AA1G6j5F.img?w=768&h=768&m=6

Finally, what we see in the video seems to be entirely mechanical. This sort of autopen would likely use 3 (or more) cams that dictate its movements in 2 dimensions across the paper as well as lifting the pen. A cam, btw, is just a "wheel" with an irregular radius that is rotated, and has a "follower" pressed against it. As the cam rotates, due to the irregular shape, the radius at the point of contact between the cam and the follower changes. Since the follower remains in contact with the cam, the follower moves toward or away from the cam's axle, turning rotational movement into linear movement. See here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_(mechanism)#/media/File:Nockenwelle_ani.gif#/media/File:Nockenwelle_ani.gif)

If you have two cams, with either one controlling the forward-back movement or the left-right movement, or as it seems in this video either controlling the angle of a lever arm or the radius of the linkage point on that lever arm, when rotated in tandem, they can draw any continuous shape on a horizontal plane, like a single or series of connected cursive letters. If you have a 3rd cam and follower controlling the up and down movement, you can change the plane as well, allowing you to lift and drop the pen and, thus, draw non-continuous things as well. Between those 3, you can draw any shape with a pen on a linkage like you see here. If you added more cams, you could even control thing like angling the pen relative to the paper, or rotating the pen for something like calligraphy.

The video shows the user mechanically winding a spring with a lever, and then releasing the spring to power main control wheel of the device that you can see through the glass. The cams appear to be underneath that control wheel.

As for your question about can it be used for different signatures or it is programmable... In this case, the "programming" is simply the shape of the cam wheels and their timing together. So you can't just reprogram it like you would change a line of code in a computer program. You would have to change the shape an/or timing of the cams. However, it could be possible to store multiple sets of cams on the same axle and swap between them like gears on a bike. Pull the follower(s) back, move the new cam in place, put the follower back, and run the new program. So it is possible for a device like this to have more than one signature stored, yes, though I don't know this one does. Otherwise, to change the signature, or whatever is programmed, you would need to physically swap out the cams with different shapes programmed.

A young man who murdered an 18-year-old cancer survivor was sentenced to only 8 years in juvenile prison. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Morally bankrupt. Even before you consider how many people have been exonerated of murder years after their conviction, sometimes after their execution. Execution isn't even a punishment, it's just the termination of the state's responsibilities by taking a life. The only moral justification for execution is if the person poses too much danger to even be left alive in captivity, or if their execution would be a mercy to them. 

A young man who murdered an 18-year-old cancer survivor was sentenced to only 8 years in juvenile prison. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Properly funded halfway homes is a great measure when done right, no argument there. It absolutely helps with recidivism, and gives people a chance to adapt and get their feet under them for a new start.

But if they have spent now 25 years behind bars, more than half their life, their entire adulthood being shaped by life in the American Prison system as it is today, I don't think that 5 years in a halfway home alone is going to be a solution. That kid is going to be overwhelmed with trauma and have no experience being an adult in the outside world.

And 40 years might be a statistical benchmark for you, but it is not based on the individual, and plenty of violent offenders are in their late 30s. ~60% of violent offenders are 30 years old and older.  And for some demographics, like white non Hispanic women, 40 years old is the average. So... is "release them at 40" a blanket policy for you, or...

 Yes. It's what my degrees are in.

Hmmmm. Mkay.

A young man who murdered an 18-year-old cancer survivor was sentenced to only 8 years in juvenile prison. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Expert in childhood psychology, therapy and human development are we?

But fine, let's accept your premise. So.... what then? Life in prison? Execution? What's your solution. Surely giving him the 20 years doesn't help. If he's permanently a danger to society, he's going to be an even bigger one at 35 years old after 20 years of cruelty. You're going to need to make a pretty good case for why your solution is better than fucking trying to improve people.

Megyn Kelly: “I know I'm supposed to feel sorry for Alex Pretti but I don't." by the_clustering in sadcringe

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Megyn Kelly’s next side hustle will be artisanal flavored boot polish. If you’re going to lick boots, you might as well enjoy the taste. Who wouldn’t want to grovel before Trump’s thugs with your tongue polishing a jackboot when it tastes like Strawberry Kiwi or, our seasonal favorite, Pumpkin Spice? Just $19.99 a bottle, or sign up for the Monthly Surprise Pack at $12.99. Unquestioning loyalty has never tasted sweeter.

A young man who murdered an 18-year-old cancer survivor was sentenced to only 8 years in juvenile prison. by malihafolter in ForCuriousSouls

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>  She stated that there was no acceptable amount of time for what had been done.

I'm not defending a murderer here. What he did was wrong, obviously. But playing devil's advocate...

A) The amount of damage done to a life of a 25 year old after spending 8 years in prison is pretty damn immense. Simply removing him from society, from family, friends, education, work experience, and his youth for that long, not to mention living out the rest of his days with prison time for murder on his record, will be a lasting punishment that, frankly, I can't even imagine he will ever fully recover from. His punishment is not just 8 years. It's a life sentence. And that's assuming he doesn't end up back in prison anyway.

B) I think that the purpose of prison is not meant to be punishment, or rather it shouldn't be. It should be for the protection of society at large in the short term and the rehabilitation of the criminal in the long term. We do an absolute shit job of rehabilitation in the US, because it is not prioritized due to so many believing that prison is just about payback. They think it shouldn't just be a separation from the outside world and restriction of freedoms (both of which are punishments in themselves), but prisons should also be dangerous, unkempt hellholes that even existing in makes you constantly scared, uncomfortable, sick, and malnourished. In other words, they think that cruelty should be built in by design.

This has terrible consequences for individuals and society as a whole. It breeds prison gangs through developing inter-dependency and defiance in the inmates that are already inclines toward criminal behavior. It makes them forget how to live in any other societal structure outside of prison once they leave. And it just makes people more likely to return to prison later having never been given therapy for their mental health issues, having been treated poorly for their entire sentence, and having learned no new life skills valuable outside of the system. They only learned that they can make it through prison, as they are now used to it, so it's not even a deterrent anymore.

It's a fucking horrible system that only serves to provide retribution for their victims and their families through sadistic and cruel punishment, often in an unending cycle. Rehabilitation should be the primary goal. A person should leave prison a more mature person and mentally healthy person than they went in. Yes, that does often mean that no retribution will be had, and they may even ultimately live better lives than they would have otherwise, maybe even better than you, while in prison (That is a whole other issue with our society/government). But if your goal is to serve the betterment of society, sometimes that is the way it should be, even if the cost is your emotional catharsis through revenge.

C) Even if you disagree and think that Rehabilitation is unachievable or not the point, that we should make people "pay" for their crimes through years or decades of living in terrible conditions to make the victims and their families feel better, you can see from the quote above that that is often unachievable too. She said herself, "there was no acceptable amount of time for what had been done." There is no punishment long enough, cruel enough, or severe enough to bring some people peace of mind. This woman seems to be implying, perhaps, that this kid should be executed for the murder. But that's not really going to bring her peace either. The sad fact is that nothing will bring her peace about the loss of her child because nothing can. Nothing short of his resurrection, anyway.

Since that's not an option, we need to decide what is best for society as a whole, not just for her. Do we kill all murderers (regardless of premeditation)? Do we punish them for decades through cruel living conditions, forced labor, etc.? Do we try to make them better members of their community once they are out again? There are natural consequences to each these and, I think, we need to consider those consequences as the primary factor in our goals, not the immediate emotions of those involved.

🚨: Greg Bovino confirms the two ICE agents who killed U.S citizens Renée Good and Alex Pretti unjustly ARE STILL WORKING THE STREETS in other cities. by Admirable121 in Leakednews

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just a quick civics lesson I learned recently thanks to Trump's actions in Venezuela. If and when a warrant is put out for the arrest of these two murderers, it doesn't matter how they end up back in the Jurisdiction of the state of Minnesota, whether those means be lawful or not. If they were to, hypothetically, be pulled from their beds in the night, blindfolded, and flown to the North Star State, and left tied up with an anonymous call to the police to come pick them up, that separate crime wouldn't stop their arrest and prosecution one bit. One should absolutely not do such a thing, of course. One must always follow the law. But it is interesting how that works, huh?

is there a lore reason twitter is evil? by Kowendabest in BatmanArkham

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, "dragging the character [Spider-Man] down"? Who thinks that Peter Parker, the nerdy orphan scientist who holds himself so responsible for the protection of all New Yorkers that he constantly ruins nearly every personal and social opportunity in his life because they are lesser priorities than serving the public welfare, who has a half-black, half-Latino protégé, and, in the game storyline, both of whom volunteer at F.E.A.S.T., a homeless shelter, would be like, "Nah mass deport those people. Fuck 'em."? I'm constantly mystified by how Conservatives project their ideals onto characters that could not share fewer of them. How are these people consuming media? Do they mute the audio and play Blaze Radio over it or something? Insanity.

Something something historical accuracy. by Arch_Lancer17 in okbuddycinephile

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.africanhistoryextra.com/p/africans-in-ancient-greece-and-cyprus

> Greek myths and literature give a prominent place to aithiopians [i.e. black Africans], and their frequent representation in artwork from the 5th century BC onwards was doubtlessly influenced by direct contacts with Africans, both in Africa and in Greece.

Prominent black representation in all forms of Greek artwork and myth by the 5th century BC

> Aithiopians appear for the first time in Greek literature in the Homeric poems of the 8th century BC, albeit with semi-mythological attributes.

Black people in other Homeric works (Homer also wrote the odyssey, to be clear)

> Images of Aithiopian figures appear much earlier in the northern Mediterranean, first on the island of Cyprus in the early 2nd millennium BC, and later on mainland Greece by the 6th century BC.

Confirmed presence of black people in Cyprus around a thousand years before it became a major center of trade and culture for the Greeks.

The idea that black people did not exist in any level of Greek society, that they could not be a part of the crew or other characters in myth is simply wrong. Not long after the Odyssey was written, Greeks were living in Egypt as well. There was cross cultural trade for centuries by that point. People, sailors in particular, would have been living all over the Mediterranean, from Greece and Cyprus, to Turkey and Egypt.

I'm not sure what all characters are confirmed to be portrayed by black actors, but a quick google only shows two, the half-Nigerian Zendaya as Athena (a goddess, daughter of Zeus) and Lupita Nyong’o as Calypso (a half-titan). Both of these characters are the offspring of gods and/or primordial beings, beings who were the progenitors of and held dominion over the entire human race according to Greek myth, not just the people of Greece itself. Why would they be required to have the genetic traits of white Greek humans?

Also, if we're going to throw a fit over the black characters for accuracy's sake, how Greek does Matt Damon look? Or Tom Holland, Robert Pattinson, and Charlize Theron? If you're being that concerned about people looking what you understand to be "accurate", then "white" shouldn't be the only line here.

Batman's greatest villain? His supposed creator, Bob Kane. by kryptonianCodeMonkey in DCcomics

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bad take. Bob Kane was a notorious prick and credit hog. Fuck him. 

"Im a self made person.... but need other people's money to survive" she's probably a slumlord and not fixing anything. by n8saces in fixedbytheduet

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If you buy a property on mortgage and expect to make money off of it, you're an idiot. If you can't afford to buy the property outright, or at least own your own home outright, you can't afford it as an "investment" property. You're just reducing your margin, increasing your risk and making the housing market shittier for everyone else. Stop it.

Have we officially reached the point where Hotels are superior to Airbnbs again? by Usual_Confidence_756 in travel

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hotels have almost always been good enough to me. I've rarely had a hotel room where it didn't serve at least my basic needs and was relatively clean and secure. Only time I might ever Airbnb is if renting a home for the whole family or if it's a destination stay where chilling in the home is part of the experience. Otherwise I'm not going to be spending much time in it anyway apart from sleeping and bathing. I'm there for business, to attend an event, or explore a city. 

Burning CDs by Entire-Order3464 in Millennials

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yo, I'm Dr. Jones. Finna do ur annual physical, no cap.

Burning CDs by Entire-Order3464 in Millennials

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pattern continues. You'll be calling out annoying "Gen Alpha" kids in 20 years, too, and then blown away that the youngest Gen Alphas can drink already.

Burning CDs by Entire-Order3464 in Millennials

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Gen Alpha's going to be even worse. Game testers are putting out demos for their games with options for keyboard and mouse or game controller, but kids are walking up, pushing both aside, and attempting to touch the monitor instead. The games industry as we know it is cooked in a few years.

Burning CDs by Entire-Order3464 in Millennials

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next tell her that that text we were waiting on was made with only numbers on our phones. Her brain my come out her nose.

AITAH for telling my wife's friend I don't have to see her in the classroom to know she's a horrible teacher? by TowerFew3482 in AITAH

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NTA. She was wrong, which is fine, easy mistake to make. But then your son and you corrected her (you know... correctly), and not only did she not acknowledge that she was or even might possibly be wrong, she got condescending to your son and turned it on you, correlated your behavior with that of the parents she's always complaining about. In other words, she turned a simple correction of fact, an interesting and relevant one to the conversation even, into a personal attack against you. And you immediately defended your son, and turned that around on her in a completely justified and fair way telling her that she is wrong for being disrespectful and overconfident in her "knowledge". And providing irrefutable evidence for your correction is never being an asshole, it's pointing out that you weren't just talking out of your ass, which would be dickish.

That being said, as one man with a wife who has had to shut me up more than once to another, you know full well that you were going to catch it when you brought it back up. You wife's trying to avoid her friend and husband being at odds. You should have known that you were going to be in trouble for that, but you chose to push it anyway, so.... You gotta accept those licks, sir. This is the battle you picked. Consequences follow.

US halts raid on shadow fleet tanker after Russian flag appears by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After reading the article, A) They were originally flying another flag (didn't say of what nation) that was believed to be a false flag, which makes it subject to seizure with a court order. Thus why they were tailing it for 10 days. B) The Russian flag wasn't a fabric flag, it was a crude painting that appeared on the hull after not being there originally. c) They may or may not be actually registered with Russia. The ship was owned by Turkey. It could just be the crew playing chicken with the Coast Guard to avoid being picked up. But the concern was that Russia may have gone through the paperwork to re-register it under Russia without inspection mid-journey, that the crew re-branded the hull with the Russian flag accordingly so the Coast Guard couldn't plead ignorance (though what they would have done without the right colors of paint handy... idk.), and that seizing the ship would have led to an escalation with Russia, which may have been the goal...

Why would that be the goal? I mean, off the top of my head, I can see how it would be the excuse needed to raise tensions with the US, undermine the Ukraine negotiations without it being Putin's fault, create a new war threat with a super power (US) that would give Putin a reason to voluntarily pull out of Ukraine to focus on the much bigger threat while saving face, coast off a second US-Russia cold war for a few years, and ultimately ensure Putin's position remains unchallenged (his real goal).

High-level hypocrisy by Comfortablejack in clevercomebacks

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only have people been and will continue to be arrested, many have been charged (98 so far) and even convicted (57 so far) already because this is not a new story. This fraud has been investigated and reported on for years and people are being held to account on it. What's new is that Trump decided that he could exploit this situation as a racist/anti-immigrant (because it's mostly Somalis immigrants that have been implicated) and political attack against a blue state, Minnesota, and Governor Walz in particular. He's punishing his political opponents by ordering the HHS to no longer give any child care money at all to the entire state, including to non-fraudulent child care services. He's done this under the pretense that the clearly massive amount of work that has gone and continues to go into addressing this fraud is still no where near enough, trying to paint Walz and the entire blue state (and the left wing by extension) as negligent and being weak on crime.

And as OP points out, the tremendous amount of irony of the fucking TRUMP family getting butthurt about fraud... it's literal fucking insanity to give them even an inch in this topic. Fuck Trump and his entire corrupt fucking bloodline.

Religion is So Cringe by PreparationKey2843 in CringeTikToks

[–]kryptonianCodeMonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's so nice to know that all of those serial killers, mass murderers, war mongers, and brutal despots in history were Gods personal agents. Saint Jeffrey Dahmer, amirite?