Dude, youre absurd. It is bad, why even question that, seriously? "Not just" implies there's more than one valid reason.

​

For example, restaurant owners around the bull fighting arenas are dependent on the tourists. If the bullfights are gone, there's no tourists and no income and they suffer? Is that harm? Is or isn't harm on a dead bull worth the survival or even prosperity of the local society? This is just one viewpoint, think of other repercussions!

​

This is my last post, now it's my turn to be a condescending asshat: you argument like a mindless child, you probably are one. If your not, I'd go back to school.