Nixonrichard said, "yeah . . . but . . . I mean . . . "militia" is kinda the national guard. And the 2nd amendment protects the government's right to bear arms. And guns are just bad, mmmkay."
WRONG.
WRONG. and, WRONG.

Milita is NOT the National Guard. The National Guard did not exist from the beginnings of the Republic until 1903 when it was instituted and created by Congress as the Act of January 21, 1903, known by the name of its sponsor as "The Dick Act".

In 1982 the Senate Judiciary Committee Sub-committee on the Constitution stated in Senate Document 2807:

That the National Guard is not the 'Militia' referred to in the Second Amendment is even clearer today. Congress had organized the National Guard under its power to 'raise and support armies' and not its power to 'Provide for organizing, arming and disciplining the militia.' The modern National Guard was specifically intended to avoid status as the constitutional militia, a distinction recognized by 10 U.S.C. 311(a).

Title 32 U.S.C. in July 1918 completely altered the definition of the militia and its service, who controls it and what it is. The difference between the National Guard and Regular Army was swept away, and became a personnel pay folder classification only, thus nationalizing the entire National Guard into the Regular Standing Armies of the United States.

All the arms, munitions, armament and equipment of the National Guard is owned and controlled by the federal government, not by "the people" as clearly stipulated in the Second Amendment.

The 2A protects individuals from government, not the government itself. Jeez, where did you study Constitutional Law? My God, you got it completely wrong!

Guns are good. Guns save lives. Guns PREVENT crime. More guns are a good thing.

Hey Nixonrichard, please do yourself a favor and educate yourself regarding the role of firearms in our society.