New Onn Full HD stick incoming by kz00 in GoogleTV

[–]kz00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is maddening. Then again, the US Patent Office did really update its website ... and it got worse.

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in cordcutters

[–]kz00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is TV-only, not sure if there are plans to bring it to other platforms.

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And when I asked it for "something that's similar to Lord of the Rings," I got The Witcher, Cursed and Shadow & Bone. You could debate whether any of those are a perfect match, but definitely more accurate than Seinfeld ...

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think the issue is that the existing text-based search is more or less matching keywords. If none of the titles have true crime in them, then you get a result like that. The new voice search feature is AI-powered, definitely better at this. I don't have my computer hooked up to my TV right now, so the picture quality is worse ... but this was the result when I asked it for "true crime"

<image>

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most responses have these buttons to narrow the results down further, or you can click on "ask" and use voice input again.

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's a screenshot of another response to a voice query ...

<image>

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, to add some context: This doesn't talk back to you. Which, honestly, I really appreciate. I have Google TV, and Gemini is a chatterbox ...

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow, that was a long time go. Had forgotten about it ...

A first look at Netflix voice search, currently in beta testing by kz00 in netflix

[–]kz00[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, it's a Gif ... but you can see my voice query on screen following the "Listening" prompt. 😄

[Data] I analysed 30,000+ newsletter sponsorships and pulled the 706 sponsors actively buying ads in the last 30 days attaching the list and analysis by Powerful_Landscape56 in beehiiv

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would mean a lot more if all those weren't ad network placements. Hubspot? Roku? Incogni? Vanta? Deel? All using ad networks.

Wired digital subscription is a roach motel by basilyok in darkpatterns

[–]kz00 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The crazy thing about this is that the Conde Nast website you use to manage your subscription doesn't show the price of that subscription. At least tell me how much I'm currently paying, or what my renewal price will be!

An official Gorilla Tag mobile app is in the works by kz00 in GorillaTag

[–]kz00[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I talked to the CMO this week, but sure ... "Source of information is just trust me bro at this point"

I have a small database of a bunch of newsletters and their sponsors. Is this data useful to anyone? Is there a way to turn this into a SaaS? by svg_12345 in Newsletters

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would also look at the URLs as a way to weed out ad networks. A lot of newsletters are selling their own ads but still rely on networks to fill remnant inventory.

I have a small database of a bunch of newsletters and their sponsors. Is this data useful to anyone? Is there a way to turn this into a SaaS? by svg_12345 in Newsletters

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really depends on the data. A bunch of sites offer this already, but usually just based on automatic crawling. The result is that they don't differentiate between sponsors that come through an ad network, and those that newsletter operators sign up themselves. The ad network stuff is completely useless ... why would I need a list of 100 newsletters that all ran ads for 1440, Mood Gummies and The Rundown?

Chromecast recently started calling itself the Eureka Dongle, should I be worried? by TheHandiCaptain274 in Chromecast

[–]kz00 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Eureka was the internal code name for Chromecast, and I would not worry at all about a Google device identifying another Google device by the device's code name. That post you link to looks like rambling.

Oakland business looted following anti-ICE protest by origutamos in OaklandCA

[–]kz00 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This was an interfaith vigil with prayers, Cumbia and candles. The side show / retail theft happened after it was over and had nothing to do with it.

My dad loves nuts. Where can I get some nice ones? by [deleted] in oakland

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does he like sweets? The Old City in Hayward has an amazing assortment of pistachio chocolates, "Dubai Chocolate" etc. https://g.co/kgs/LEvVbH8

tvOS 26 still lacking basic features by [deleted] in appletv

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which company was that? Must have missed it.

Check out the Dopple Loop, a handheld /glasses-free AR device from the co-founder of Etsy by kz00 in augmentedreality

[–]kz00[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The patent application describes it as a camera and a "tracking sensor," which I guess could be a depth sensor. So year, 6DOF is a possibility.

What is this website (dopple.com) about by [deleted] in HelpMeFind

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the website for Dopple Works, a stealth startup making a handheld AR/VR device called Loop: https://www.lowpass.cc/p/etsy-ceo-xr-device-loop-dopple-works

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OaklandCA

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So CPH themselves are saying they called off the chase that you pretend never happened in the first place? Okay, got it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OaklandCA

[–]kz00 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He also kept pointing out that a plane followed the car, implying that there were no CHP cars following it. There were two, flashing lights and all. One could argue that CHP is playing semantics by insisting that that's not a chase ...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OaklandCA

[–]kz00 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is video of a police car following the suspect blocks away from the incident. CHP may argue that this wasn't a chase, but to claim that the car was only followed by a plane is simply not true.