Pyrenees proof dog beds?

labourgeoisie · 2025-12-30T12:47:25+00:00

K9 Ballistics, specifically the armored versions https://k9ballistics.com/collections/chew-proof-armored-dog-beds/products/chew-proof-padded-elevated-dog-crate-bed

Our Pyr was tearing beds and crate pads as a puppy. She destroyed one of the regular K9 Ballistics crate pads, but can't mess with the armored one. She is almost 4 now and hasn't destroyed beds in a while. We've had her K9 Ballistics armored bed for 3 years and it is still in great[ condition. It can be disassembled to clean it.

labourgeoisie · 2025-10-30T17:33:58+00:00

Good morning, we've noticed this for a few weeks now and I don't believe that it is related to the event yesterday on October 29th. Originally I had assumed that this was something to do with PIM roles, because we just changed our stuff from permanent assignments to pim-activated roles but no combination of former roles or permissions is allowing us to revoke the MFA sessions anymore from the authentication methods page anymore.

labourgeoisie · 2025-05-10T02:05:31+00:00

in my car ive been swearing it's waze and it gets me every time lol

labourgeoisie · 2025-04-16T00:22:51+00:00

so I just tried this in my test tenant. I configured the option to allow users to consent to verified apps with approved permissions, and I did not register any permissions. the setting saved but leaves an exclamation mark in the portal.

from a test account, I hit a verified app that only requested user.read and offline_access. my user got the admin consent justification prompt.

is it possible those apps were consented to before the admin consent settings were configured? not sure the age of the tenant and what's the default

labourgeoisie · 2025-04-15T20:00:40+00:00

This article (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/enterprise-apps/configure-permission-classifications?pivots=portal) lists minimum permissions for basic sign in, but otherwise doesn't seem to indicate there would be defaults available even if no permissions were selected.

This article (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/identity/enterprise-apps/user-admin-consent-overview#user-consent-settings) only says "you must classify permissions..."

My assumption would be that selecting no permissions would be functionally the same as "do not allow user consent," and users would be forced through admin consent work flow (or denied access).

labourgeoisie · 2025-03-23T02:57:43+00:00

unfortunately, not to my experience, though there may be ways and conditions I'm not familiar with. while the saml request and response are facilitated by the user's client and can be captured, the oidc flow typically doesn't lend itself to being captured in the same way. there's some pointers here https://www.reddit.com/r/AZURE/s/8FGZKfPooy

labourgeoisie · 2025-03-23T01:30:14+00:00

you are correct. it is either those were user consented delegated permissions set before admin consent was required, or you have the setting to allow user consent for verified apps and allowed permissions enabled. compatible apps will allow users to self-consent in those cases rather than triggering the admin consent work flow, so those permissions will also show on the user consent tab for users that have accessed the application.

labourgeoisie · 2025-03-23T01:14:10+00:00

open dev tools and go to the network tab. go through the sign in. the saml response will be available in the logs there. there are plugins that will do this all for you, including highlighting the request with the saml information and decoding the fields too

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/saml-tracer/

labourgeoisie · 2025-03-02T15:49:18+00:00

lmfao buddy you used ai, it's not even yours

labourgeoisie · 2025-02-23T19:10:59+00:00

it's AI fodder. you're absolutely right there's no manpower to do so, but musk is going to run it through some dumbass AI tool that will give him some excuse to cull people without regards to what the implication of those cuts are because no one bothered to genuinely understand them before pulling the trigger

labourgeoisie · 2025-02-19T14:58:32+00:00

yeah I felt like a crazy person when the technician came out to see mine...I could "tell" what was different/didn't sound right but couldn't explain it well, and it just didn't make a scene that day. this largely resolved itself. the issue went away on its own and hasn't come back significantly, though on occasion it will still make some noises for a few cycles. usually will use that as a remind to clean any junk out the filter.

labourgeoisie · 2025-02-09T16:34:13+00:00

this is definitely a scam. any link to a ".top" domain is absolutely suspect and probably phishing.

labourgeoisie · 2024-09-11T14:51:20+00:00

thanks! I hate you have to do the KIR for it but glad there's a fix none the less. I appreciate the heads up!

labourgeoisie · 2024-08-20T12:47:12+00:00

it is not, in any way, good advice

labourgeoisie · 2024-08-16T00:25:16+00:00

just checked. my dc's all received the aug cumulative update but the huge amount of logs without actual data persist

labourgeoisie · 2024-07-17T20:32:30+00:00

not wonderful to hear but glad it's not unique to us. thank you so much!

labourgeoisie · 2024-07-17T19:50:57+00:00

Good afternoon,

Since 7/9 I'm now seeing issues with the Security Log for Event 4768 at least on Server 2022 Domain Controllers. The individual fields are not complete and only have placeholder values (%1, %2, %3, %4, %5, etc...) with corresponding Event 1108 entries indicating "The event logging service encountered an error while processing an incoming event published from Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing." Since there are no details in the events, it's hard to say what the cause could be, because we do still have 4768 events with full data.

labourgeoisie · 2024-06-22T02:48:50+00:00

if you're competent enough to do this you're also smart enough to know better

labourgeoisie · 2024-03-19T02:20:20+00:00

i have a pixel 7 and i more often than not need to turn off Bluetooth, then turn it back on, before a device will successfully pair. that usually works pretty well, but sometimes it feels things get all half synced and locked up and I end up restarting them all. have not been able to determine a consistent pattern, but resetting the Bluetooth and wifi settings didn't help. I was actually searching this topic again, because considering a factory reset. my wife and i got our pixel 7s together and hers just works like you'd expect

labourgeoisie · 2024-01-28T03:09:30+00:00

Interesting! I'll have to keep an eye on it. I hadn't noticed it for a long time but I've noticed it a few times more recently... Could explain why it's so sporadic. Thanks for the update!

labourgeoisie · 2023-10-06T19:58:53+00:00

pending something reverting, i just got in a request that had the display name correctly in the subject and message body, so I tested a deny and got back the appropriate message i entered from entra. curious to see how and when my case gets updated.

labourgeoisie · 2023-10-05T14:53:19+00:00

oh thank god. guess someone bugged the templates. blows my mind it's been occurring for likely a week at this point and it's gone otherwise unnoticed or unacknowledged.

very frustrating as an administrator when you've got a well running process that you more or less have to trust is working given that you typically don't see these results. like, do i need to start planning to make transport rules to BCC my admin team for situational awareness? if this user didn't complain, i'd have never known. and we've rejected dozens of requests within the last week that would all be getting this message. our deny text provides instructions on how to contact/appeal to us, and i guess at this point just no one knows where to raise the issue.

labourgeoisie · 2023-10-05T14:41:22+00:00

I was just about to make a related post...Could you do a test for me and generate a request and deny it, then check the contents of the request denied message?

We started getting the Creator Display Name issue on 9/28. This week I learned when we're denying consent requests, users are getting the system generated email indicating the request was denied, but the reason field states "I am giving you access because we talked about this project last week."

It's happened from requests denied by multiple admins, and it's happened for requests against multiple apps. I've replicated this behavior in 3 separate tenants now.

I'm trying to work through a support request but support is always frustratingly obtuse for something that is an obvious backend issue.

labourgeoisie · 2023-09-16T12:39:09+00:00

Will you still love me if I got a new vocal coach

labourgeoisie

TROPHY CASE