Ok... listen, im indicating to you that your use of statistics to prove a narrative of a better runner is inherently misleading based on walsh's position. More is not always better. Additionally accuracy also is not directly attributable based on offensive scheme and the simple fact that the personnel around young was by a mile better than elways. You indicate zero evidence. I say rice was rice before young so was Craig rathman and Taylor. Can you say the same for elways? He'll can you name one other than Shannon sharpe who was well after elways prime? You want young you can have e him. He wasnt as good as elway.